Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Selvaraj Vs. the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
IN THE H IGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:06. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.3797, 5107, 8207 of 2004 and 15326 of 2013 M.Selvaraj, Rep. By Power of Attorney O.A.Varadadesigan ... Petitioner in WP.No.3797/2004 C.Gnanasekaran ... Petitioner in W.P.No.5107/2004 V.Bakthavatchalam ... Petitioner in W.P.No.8207/2004 B.Venkatanarayanan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.15326/2004 Vs. 1.The Presiding Officer, Principal Labour Court, Chennai. 2.Management of Rane (Madras) Limited, Velachery, Chennai 600 032. ... Respondents in all the writ petitions PRAYER IN W.P.No.3797 OF2004 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the concerned records from the first respondent, quash the order of the first respondent dated 31.12.2001 in I.D.No.560 of 1990 insofar as holding that the domestic enquiry conducted against the petitioner in respect of the charge memos issued to him is far and proper ...
Manjula Sunil Vs. K.A.Bijoy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :06. / 06 / 2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.R.P.No.2886 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 1. Manjula Sunil 2. Mythili Madhavan .. Petitioners Vs.1. K.A.Bijoy 2. A.C.Mahesh 3. Mrs.Mridula Sugadhan 4. Sangeetha Mahesh (No relief claimed against 3rd respondent, hence given up) .. Respondents Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 08.02.2008 made in I.A.No.887 of 2006 in O.S.No.199 of 2003, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Coimbatore. For the Petitioners : Mrs.P.T.Asha for M/s Sarvabhauman Associates For the first Respondent : Mr.M.Sridhar For the Respondents 2 & 4 : No appearance For the third Respondent : given up ORDER The Civil Revision Petition is filed by the Civil Revision Petitioners who are defendants 2 and 3 in the original suit against the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.887 of 2006 in O.S.No.199 o...
Nirmala College for Women Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :06. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR W.P.No.33982 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 The Secretary, Nirmala College for Women (Autonomous), Red Fields, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District - 641 018. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 006. 2.The Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006. 3.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Coimbatore Region, Coimbatore District 641 018. 4.The Bharathiar University, rep. by its Registrar, Maruthamalai Road, Coimbatore District 641 046. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent State Government to consider and pass orders forthwith on the petitioner's application dated 22.5.2009 for recognising the status of the petitioner-college as a Christian Religious M...
Uthiravel Vs. the State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Date ::06. .06..2014 Coram :: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Dhanapalan and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice G. Chockalingam Criminal Appeal No:351. of 2012 Uthiravel @ Ukkiravel S/o. Ariyaputhiran Konar Street Melaneduvai Village Udayarpalayam Taluk Ariyalur District. ... Appellant -vs- The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Andimadam Police Station Ariyalur District. ... Respondent .. .. .. Criminal appeal under Section 374 of Cr. P.C. against the judgment of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Ariyalur, made in S.C. No:59. of 2009 dated 27.12.2011 convicting the appellant under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. For appellant :: Mr. G. Saravanan For respondent :: Mr. M. Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor .. .. .. J U D G E M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by V. Dhana...
Dr.B.T.Manicka Vs. State Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:06. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.R.C.(MD)No.730 of 2013 and Crl.R.C.(MD)Nos.438 and 411 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2013 Dr.B.T.Manickavel : Petitioner in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.730 of 2013/A-1 K.Venkatesh : Petitioner in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.438 of 2013/A-2 S.Kannan : Petitioner in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.411 of 2013/A-3 Vs. State rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Sivagangai, (Cr.No.5/2001) : Respondent in Crl.R.C.(MD)Nos.730 &411/2013 State rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, D.V. & A.C., Sivagangai. : Respondent in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.438/2013 COMMON PRAYER Criminal Revision Cases are filed under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for the records pertaining to the order in Crl.M.P.Nos.653 and 654 and of 2009 in C.C.No.19 of 2008, respectively dated 26.03.2013, on the file of the learned Special Judge -cum- Chief Judicial Magistrate, Si...
V.G.Jayasutha Vs. T.Sivamani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:06.06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRP (PD) No.776 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 V.G.Jayasutha .. Petitioner Vs. T.Sivamani .. Respondent Prayer : Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 11.08.2012 made in I.A.No.1715 of 2010 in O.P.No.1042 of 2010 on the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mrs.C.Sangamithirai For Respondent : Mr.J.R.K.Bhavanantham ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 11.08.2012 made in I.A.No.1715 of 2010 in O.P.No.1042 of 2010 on the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai, allowing the husband/respondent herein to visit the child S.J.Sukanya @ S.Prarthana on 2nd Saturday of every month at Children Center, Family Court Premises, Chennai, from 11 a.m. to 12.00 p.m., commenced from the Month of September 2012.2. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner has s...
J.Sundararajan @ Sundaram Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:06. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.3093 of 2009 J.Sundararajan @ Sundaram : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildar (South), Office of the District Collector, Madurai. 3.The Joint Commissioner, Executive Officer, Arulmighu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple, Madurai. [R-3 impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 03.04.2013 made in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2013]. 4.Arulmighu Subramania Swamy Temple, Tiruparankundram, Madurai through its Deputy Commissioner/Executive Officer [R-4 impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 20.03.2014 made in M.P.(MD)No.3 of 2013]. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the second respondent in his proceedings No.410/09/A3, dated 20.02.2009, and quash the same, and direc...
V.Manimekalai Ramanathan Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.W.P.No.13892 of 2010 V.Manimekalai Ramanathan .Petitioner -versus 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary to Government School Education Department Fort St.George, Chennai 9 2. The Director of School Education College Road Chennai 600 006 3. The Chief Educational Officer Chennai District Chennai 600 015 4. The District Educational Officer North Chennai Chennai 600 008 5. The Shri Shudhadwaita Vaishnavi Higher Secondary School represented by its Secretary 30, E.12, Agraharam Chennai 600 003 .Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to count the service rendered by the petitioner as Tamil Pandit for a period from 04.10.1995 to 19.02.1997 in the fifth respondent school as qualifying service and add the same to the service rendered by the petitioner for a period from 20.02.1997 to 31.0...
D.Ananthi Vs. K.Chandrasekaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:06.06.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL O.S.A.No.129 of 2014 and O.S.A.No.143 of 2014 *** O.S.A.No.129 of 2014: 1.D.Ananthi 2.A.Sundararaj ..Appellants/Applicants/Third Parties V. 1.K.Chandrasekaran ..1st Respondent/ 1st Respondent/Applicant/Plaintiff 2.S.V.Angappan 3.The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. 4.The Director (Finance) Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, (Chairman of Wages Revision Committee) No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. 5.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, (Chairman of Wages Revision Committee) No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002..Respondents 2 to 5/Respondents 2-5/Respondents/Defendants Prayer: Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as a...
A.S.Paramasamy Battachar Vs. 1.The District Forest Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.1026 of 2009 and W.P.M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2009 A.S.Paramasamy Battachar .Petitioner versus 1.The District Forest Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Forest Ranger, Sirumalai Range, Dindigul District. 3.Forest Watcher, Sirumalai Range, Dindigul District.Respondents This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents herein from in any way obstructing the petitioner or other devotees from using the pathway in Zamin Patta No.343, Sirumalai Oruthattu Village, Dindigul Taluk & District, to reach Arulmighu Sr.Vellimalaiyandi Temple, Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul District, to offer poojas and conduct festivals. !For Petitioner : Mr.N.Damodaran For Respondents: Mr.D.Muruganandham Additional Government Pleader :ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner forbearing t...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »