Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Vs. Express Construction Company
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16-6-2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION (NPD) No.1043 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 Sunil Proprietor of M/s.Square No.78/829, Anna Salai Chennai 600 002 .Petitioner vs Express Construction Company By its Managing Partner C.M.Ibrahim 78/829, Anna Salai Mount Road, Chennai 2 .Respondent Civil revision petition preferred under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act against the judgment and decree dated 13.11.2009, made in R.C.A.No.58/2008, on the file of the VIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 20.11.2007, made in R.C.O.P.No.2262/2006, on the file of XIV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.O.R.Santhanakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.G.Ramachandran ORDER The revision petitioner is the tenant/respondent in R.C.O.P.No.2262/2006, on the file of the Court of XIV Judge of Small Causes (Rent Controller) at Che...
A.Thirumurugan Vs. the Director of Medical Education
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :16. 06.2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice B.RAJENDRAN W.P. Nos. 15281 to 15295 of 2014 W.P.No.15281 of 2014:- Dr.A.Thirumurugan ...Petitioner vs. 1.The Director of Medical Education Directorate of Medical Education Kilpauk Chennai-600 010. 2.The Dean Madras Medical College Chennai 600 003. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to return petitioner's all original certificates as per the petitioner's common representation dated 25.05.2014. For Petitioner : M/s.Helen Justin For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan Additional Government Pleader COMMON ORDER By consent, all these Writ Petitions are taken up for final disposal at the time of admission itself. 2.Heard, M/s.Helen Justin, learned counsel for the petitioners and also Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, learned Additional Government Pleader, who has taken notice on behalf of the respon...
Abdul Thahir Vs. Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:16. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM H.C.P.No.3320 of 2013 Abdul Thahir ... Petitioner -vs- 1. Government of Tamilnadu, rep. By its Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XVI) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore City. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the records in the Detention Order in C.No.65/G/IS/2013 dated 30.11.2013 on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to produce the body of the friend of the petitioner R.Ramesh, son of Ramaiah, aged 37 years, now confined in Central Prison, Coimbatore before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Subhadra Devi For Respondents : Mr.P.Govindarajan Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER (Order of the Court was made by V.D...
S.MartIn Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:16. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.No.384 of 2014 S.Martin ... Appellant Vs.1. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch Egmore, Chennai 600 008 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Copyright Wing, CCB (Central CID Branch) Egmore, Chennai 600 008 3. The Inspector of Police, S8 Adambakkam Police Station Chennai 600 088. .... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 21.2.2014 made in W.P.No.32317 of 2012 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.Vijaya Narayanan,Sr.Counsel for Mr.R.Vivekanandhan For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmuga Velayutham, Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.V.Subbiah,Spl.Govt.Pleader JUDGMENT The appellant herein has been arrayed as accused in Crime No.304 of 2012 on the file of 3rd respondent herein for the offences alleged under Section 294(A), 420 and 120-B I...
D.Mythili Vs. D. Madhavi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :16. 06.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN CRP PD No.2048 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 D.Mythili .. Petitioner vs. 1.D. Madhavi 2.Ellangovan 3.Damodharan 4.G.D.Pushpavathi 5.S.Kothainayaki .. Respondents Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC against the fair order and decretal order passed in I.A.No.9305/2013 in O.S.No.3050/1993 dated 12.03.2014 on the file of VII Asst. City Civil Court at Chennai and Preliminary decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.3030/93 dated 16.07.2002 on the file of VII City Civil Court at Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Balasubramanian ORDER A person, who pretends as if he was in deep slumber suddenly woke up and filed a petition as if she is not aware of the entire proceedings for the past 20 years, has come before this court challenging the dismissal of the petition filed by her under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 4661 days in filing set aside...
Sundaram Fasteners Limited Vs. S.Venkatesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:16.06.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL O.S.A.No.337 of 2013 and O.S.A.No.291 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 *** Sundaram Fasteners Limited Represented by its Executive Director & Secretary - Mr.V.G.Jaganathan No.98-A, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004..Appellant/Applicant/Plaintiff in both OSAs.V.S.Venkatesan S/o.Late Sarangapani Shrishti Apartments No.240, I Cross Street, III Main Road, Natesan Nagar, Virugambakkam Chennai 600 092..Respondent/Respondent/Defendant Prayer: Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 11 of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the order and decretal dated 02.01.2013 in A.No.3488 of 2012 in C.S.No.507 of 2012 and O.A.No.677 of 2012 in C.S.No.507 of 2012 passed by the Learned Single Judge. For Appellant : Mr.P.R.Raman For Respondent : Mr.D.Prabhu Mukunth For M/s.N.Rangasamy COMMON JUDGMENT M.VENUGOPAL, ...
Murugesan Vs. the State Represented by Its
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :16. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM H.C.P. No.3212 of 2013 Murugesan ... Petitioner vs.1. The State represented by its Secretary to Government (Home), Prohibition and Excise Department, Government of Tamilnadu, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Police Salem City, Salem. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the records pertaining to the order of detention dated 25.11.2013 passed by the 2nd respondent in C.M.P.No.48/Goonda/Salem City/2013 and quash the same and produce the detenu, Manikandan, aged about 24 years, S/o.Murugesan before this Court and set him at liberty and the detenu now has been confined at Central Prison, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.P.Govindarajan Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER (Order of the Court was ...
The Managing Director Vs. Muniammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED:16. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR C.M.A.No.1724 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem - 7 ... Appellant Vs. 1.Muniammal 2.Madhu Respondents The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the award & Decree dated 03.07.2013 made in M.C.O.P.No.1380 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Special District Judge), Salem. For Appellant : Mr. D.Venkatachalam JUDGMENT In the accident which occurred on 29.05.2008, involving a State Transport Corporation bus bearing Regn.No.TN30N1541, a 45 year old man stated to have been self employed, by making springs for bus and lorry and earned Rs.10,000/- per month including batta, died. A case in Cr.No.278 of 2008 under Sections 279 and 304 IPC has been registered against the driver of the State Transport Corporation bus, Salem. Legal ...
Amal Francis Sam Vs. the Dean
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :16. 06.2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice B.RAJENDRAN W.P. No.15343 of 2014 1. Dr.Amal Francis Sam 2. Dr.Geetha Rajagopalan 3. Dr.S.Ramya 4. Dr.L.Latha 5. Dr.Ranjith Cheriyan Philip 6. Dr.Chatterjee Ambrash Soumitra ...Petitioners vs. The Dean Coimbatore Medical College Coimbatore 641 014. ...Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to return to issue S.S.L.C.Mark Sheet, Higher Secondary Mark Sheet, M.B.B.S.Degree Certificate and mark sheet, Medical Registration Certificate, C.R.R.I.Completion certificate, P.G.Course Certificate, P.G.Degree Certificate, Conduct Certificate and Transfer Certificate to the petitioners without insisting the payment of bond amount as a pre-condition. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Lokesh For Respondent : Mr.P.Rajalakshmi Government Advocate COMMON ORDER By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for fi...
Kannan Vs. State Represented by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-16-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRIMINAL APPEAL(MD)No.396 of 2013 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION(MD)No.2 of 2013 Kannan .Appellant/ Sole Accused versus State represented by The Inspector of Police, Vilathikulam Police Station, Tuticorin District. (Crime No.95 of 2012).Respondent/ Complainant Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the Judgment dated 27.06.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.36 of 2013 by the FiRs.Additional District and Sessions Court, Tuticorin. !For Appellant : Mr.G.Anbusaravanan ^For Respondent : Mr.C.Ramesh, Addl. Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.The conviction and sentence dated 27.06.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.36 of 2013 by the FiRs.Additional District and Sessions Court, Tuticorin are being challenged in the present Criminal Appeal. 2.The case of the prosecut...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »