Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Muniyasamy Vs. State Through
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL.R.C.(MD)No.239 of 2012 Muniyasamy .Petitioner Versus State through The Inspector of Police Kenikarai Police Station Ramanathapuram District [In Crime No.432 of 2007].Respondent Criminal Revision Case filed under section 396 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C.to call for the records in C.A.No.8 of 2011 dated 12.04.2012 on the file of the Additional District Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Ramanathapuram, which has modified the judgment passed in S.C.No.47 of 2009 dated 30.03.2011 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram and set aside the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mariappan ^For Respondent : Ms.S.Prabha, Govt. Advocate [crl.side].*** :ORDER This criminal revision petition has been filed challenging the conviction of the revision petitioner for an offence under Section 498[A].IPC passed by the Courts below. The revision petitioner was sentenced to undergo one year Rigorous Im...
T.Retnapandian Vs. 1.The Union of India,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :13.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (MD)No.4713 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 T.Retnapandian ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Union of India, Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, AYUSH Bhavan, B-Block, GPO complex, INA, New Delhi-110 023. 2.The Secretary, Central Council of Indian Medicine, 61-65, Institutional Area, Janakpuri, New Delhi-110 058. 3.The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Dr.MGR Medical University, 69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 4.Dr.Vanitha Muralikumar ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of declaration, declaring the nomination of the 4th respondent as a member of the Central Council of Indian Medicine from 28.02.2014 vide the notification in the Gazette of India Extraordinary Part-II, Section 3, sub-section (ii), dated...
M.Mukundan Vs. the Chief Secretary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 13.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN Writ Petition No.13856 of 2012 M.Mukundan .Petitioner. Versus 1.The Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Home Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 3.The District Revenue Officer/ Competent Authority, District Revenue Office, Collectorate, Chennai. 4.Narayanan .Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2013 to direct the 3rd respondent to recover the excess amounts paid to the 4th respondent from M/s.Maruthi Finance Accounts and further directing the 3rd respondent to strictly follow the TNPID Act and the direction of the learned Special Judge under TNPID Act, Chennai in future. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondents : Mr.Ravi Chandran (R1 to R3) Mr.R.C.Paul Kanakaraj (R4) ORDER This Writ Pet...
S.Amara Jothi Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:13. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD)No.10893 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 S.Amara Jothi ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Chief Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Department, Secretariate, Chennai -9. 2.The District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayat, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 3.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayats), Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.A7/O.E.(Oo)/1258/2012, dated 10.06.2013 and consequential notification No.VI(2)/112(a)/2013, published in Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, dated 12.06.2013 and quash the same as illegal. !For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan, Senior Counsel for M/s.Ajmal Assoc...
The Royal Sundaram Alliance Vs. D.Gunasekaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED:13. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR C.M.A.Nos.1739 to 1746 of 2007 M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2007 The Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Sundaram Towners, MACT Cell, Nos.45 and 46, Whites Road, Chennai 600 014. ... Appellants in all CMAs. Vs. 1.D.Gunasekaran 2.G.Kumar 3.G.Karthick 4.G.Reena 5.Minor G.Veeramani (Rep., by its father, D.Gunasekaran) ... Respondents 1 to 5 in CMA.No.1739 of 2007 6.Raji 7.Selvi 8.Karpagam 9.kanchana 10.Maragatham 11.Lakshmi ... Respondents 1 to 6 in CMA.No.1740 of 2007 12.R.Palani 13.P.Sumathi 14.P.Saritha ... Respondents 1 to 3 in CMA.No.1741 of 2007 15.P.Murugan 16.Minor M.Kasthuri 17.Minor M.Meena 18.Minor M.Vignesh (Minors are rep., by his father, P.Murugan) ... Respondents 1 to 4 in CMA.No.1742 of 2007 19.Chellammal 20.Gayathri ... Respondents 1 and 2 in CMA.No.1743 of 2007 21.Padma ... 1st Respondent in CMA.1744/2007 22.Shyamala ... 1st Respondent in CMA.1745/2007 23.Rajammal ... 1st...
Benatic Augusti Vs. State Through
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.06.2014 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Criminal Revision Case (Md.No.263 of 2014 and M.P.(Md.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 Benatic Augustin : Petitioner/Accused No.1 versus State through Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Tirunelveli District. : Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records from the trial court and set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.114 of 2013 in S.C.No.358 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli and to pass order to allow the petition filed by the revision petitioner to discharge him from the case. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Anbarasu ^For respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, Government Advocate (Crl. side) :ORDER This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 18.02.2014 passed in Cr.M.P.No.114 of 2013 in S.C.No.358 of 2012 by the Additional Sub ...
Revath Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:13. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE.V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE.V.M.VELUMANI H.C.P.(MD)Nos.257 of2014 and H.C.P.(MD)Nos.258 of 2014 Revathi : Petitioner in HCP.No.257/2014 Vasanthi : Petitioner in HCP.No.258/2014 Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort.St.Geroge, Chennai-9 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Thajavur District, Thanjavur. : Respondents in both HCPs H.C.P.(MD)No.257 of 2014:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records of the detention order 31/07/2013 in detention order P.D.No.44/2013 on the file of the Second Respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to produce the body of the detenue Murugan @ Periyavan Son of Kittappa aged about 37 years who is detained in Central Prison Cudallore before this Honour...
Flextronics Technologies India Pvt Ltd Vs. the Assistant Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :13. 06-2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN Writ Petition No.15373 of 2014 and M.P. No.1 of 2014 M/s. Flextronics Technologies India Pvt Ltd Plot No.3, Phase-II SIPCOT Industrial Park Santhavelur C. Village Sriperumbudur Kancheepuram District 602 106 .. Petitioner Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Sriperumbudur Assessment Circle Varadharajapuram .. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the respondent in RC22302013/A3 and quash the proceedings dated 05.06.2014 issued therein. For Petitioner : Ms. Hema Murali Krishnan For Respondent : Mr. Kanmani Annamalai Additional Government Pleader (Tax) ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the notice dated 05.06.2014 issued by the respondent herein, wherein, the petitioner was called upon to pay the penalty amount of Rs.4,72,43,733/- within 3 days from the receipt...
K.Sivaprakasham Vs. Turbo Energy Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :13. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.7842 of 2010 K.Sivaprakasham .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The Management of M/s Turbo Energy Ltd., Pulivalam Vellore District 2. The Presiding Officer Principal Labour Court Vellore .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records from the file of the 2nd respondent in I.D.No.165 of 2004 and quash its impugned award made therein dated 25.08.2009, in so far as the 2nd respondent has denied and negatived the petitioner's claim for reinstatement in service, with continuity of service, with back wages and with all other attendant and consequential benefits. For Petitioner :: Mr.R.Shanmugham for M/s Shanmugha Associates For Respondents :: Mr.S.Ravindran for M/s T.S.Gopalan & Co. for R1 R2-Court ORDER The present writ petition is directed against the impugned award passed by the Principal Labour C...
G.Ramesh Murali Vs. 1.K.Veeraputhiran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.06.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Appeal (Md.No.449 of 2014 G.Ramesh Murali ..Appellant versus 1.K.Veeraputhiran 2.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Dindigul. 3.The Tamil Nadu Sports Development Authority, Rep. by its District Sports Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul..Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 06.03.2014 made in W.P.(MD)No.3716 of 2014 on the file of this Court. !For Appellant : Mr.N.Sathish Babu ^For Respondents 2&3 : Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian, Special Government Pleader. For 1st Respondent : Mr.M.S.Suresh Kumar :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J.) This appeal arises out of an order passed in a writ petition filed by the fiRs.respondent herein directing the transfer of licence to put up stalls during a temple festival, from the appellant to the...