Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Santha Kumar Vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:13. 06-2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN CMA No.440 and 991 of 2013 and MP No.1 of 2013 M.Santha Kumar .. Appellant in CMA44013 Respondent in CMA99113 vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram Division) Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Kancheepuram... Respondent in CMA44013 Appellant in CMA99113 CMA No.440 of 2013 is preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 17.8.2012 made in MCOP No.3356 of 2009 on the file of the III Judge, Small Causes Court (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal), Chennai. CMA No.991 of 2013 is preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 59 of 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 17.8.2012 made in MCOP No.3356 of 2009 on the file of the III Judge, Small Causes Court (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal), Chennai. For Appellant in CMA44013 & For Respondent in CMA99113...
Mr.Prashaanth Balasubramaniam Vs. the Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:13. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.15150 of 2014 Mr.Prashaanth Balasubramaniam ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Union of India, represented by the Ministry of Law and Justice, Shastri Bhawan, A-Wing, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi - 110 001 2. The Ministry of Information and Technology Electronics Niketan, 6, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi - 110 003. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a writ of declaration to declare the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Ordinance, 2014 dated 28.05.2014 issued by the first respondent as unconstitutional. For Petitioner : Mr.Nithyaesh Natraj ORDER This Pro bono Publico has been instituted by a young lawyer seeking to declare the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Ordinance, 2014 (No.3 of 2014) dated 28.5.2014 passed by ...
Neelavathy Vs. 1.The Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.15932 of 2010 Neelavathy : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director, Social Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Social Welfare Officer, Karur. 3.The Commissioner, Kadavoor Panchayat Union, Karur. 4.The Director, Directorate of Secondary Examination, College Road, Chennai. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent by his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.54239/Nir 5-3/2011, dated 23.12.2011 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to pay all the terminal benefits and retirement benefits. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.S.Palanivel Rajan For Respondents : Mr.K.Guru Additional Government Pleader :ORDER The case of the petitioner is that she joined as Children Welfare Organizer, with effect from 15.12.1972 under the first resp...
Kalavathy Vs. A.Pandian
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:09. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.1128 of 2007 and M.P.Nos.1/2007 and 1/2009 Kalavathy .. Appellant -Vs- A.Pandian .. Respondents Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram dated 24.03.2007 made in A.S.No.28 of 2006 confirming the judgment and decree of the Additional District Munsif, Chidambaram dated 30.03.2005 made in O.S.No.28 of 2003. For Appellant : Mr.S.Venkateswaran for Mrs.R.Meenal For Respondent : Mr.A.Muthukumar ----- JUDGMENT The defendant in the original suit O.S.No.28/2003 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Chidambaram, who suffered a decree for recovery of possession of the suit property, which was confirmed by the lower appellate court, namely Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram on 24.03.2007 in A.S.No.28/2006, has brought-forth this second appeal challenging the decree of the lower appellate court confirming t...
Sumathi @ Jesinthal Vs. Senthamarai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN C.R.P.(MD)No.579 of 2014 & M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2014 Sumathi @ Jesinthal .Petitioner versus Senthamarai .Respondent PRAYER Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the fair and decreetal order, dated 10.12.2013 and made in I.A.No.144 of 2013 in O.S.No.42 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Sub-Court, Kumbakonam, and set aside the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu ^For Respondent : Mr.V.Achuthan :ORDER This memorandum of Civil Revision Petition has been directed against the fair and decreetal order, dated 10.12.2013 and made in I.A.No.144 of 2013 in O.S.No.42 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Sub-Court, Kumbakonam. 2.The Revision Petitioner herein is the defendant, whereas, the respondent herein is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.42 of 2010. 3.The above civil suit has been filed by the r...
The Commissioner Vs. K.P.Jaganathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:09. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Writ Appeal No.1027 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.The Commissioner, Department of Employment and Training, Alandur Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2.The District Collector, Cuddalore. 3.The District Employment Officer, Cuddalore. 4.The Tahsildar, Tittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District. ... Appellants Vs K.P.Jaganathan ... Respondent Prayer:- Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order, dated 02.08.2012, made in W.P.No.26162 of 2010. For Appellant :Mr.V.Subbiah, Spl. Govt. Pleader. For Respondent :No appearance. JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR,J.) This writ appeal is filed against the order made in W.P.No.26162 of 2010, dated 02.08.2012, wherein the respondent has prayed for a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the recruitment/selection process initiated by the...
M.Janarthanan Vs. the Chairman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :09. 06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.32563 & 32564 of 2012 M.Janarthanan .. Petitioner in both the writ petitions -vs- 1. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Chennai 600 005 2. The Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development (UD2-3) Department Secretariat Chennai 600 009 3. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Chennai 600 005 4. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Chennai 600 005 .. Respondents 1 to 4 in W.P.No.32563 of 2012 5. The Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development (UD2-3) Department Secretariat Chennai 600 009 6. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board Chennai 600 005 .. Respondents 1 & 2 in W.P.No.32564 of 2012 W.P.No.32563 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of impugned order of suspension passed by the first respon...
Salzer Electronics Limited Vs. S.G.Controls and Switchgear Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:09.06.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL O.S.A.Nos.413 and 414 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 *** Salzer Electronics Limited, Subhiksha Flats, Old No.15, New No.20, Vellala Street, Kodambakkam Chennai 600 024. rep. By its Constituted Attorney, Mr.A.M.R.Gandhi ..Appellant/Applicant/Plaintiff in both OSAs V. 1.S.G.Controls & Switchgear (P) Ltd., No.82, Udyog Vihar, Industrial Area Phase 4, Gurgaon 121 001. Haryana. 2.Rajdhani Industrial Spares, Old No.15/16, Govindappan Naicken Street, Chennai 600 001..Respondents/Respondents/Defendants in both OSAs Prayer: Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the Common order dated 21.09.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in O.A.Nos.327 and 328 of 2011 in C.S.No.240 of 2011. For Appellant : Mr.P.S.Raman Senior Counsel For M/s.A.A.Mohan For Respondents : M...
P.Rani Vs. the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:09. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM H.C.P.No.2212 of 2013 P.Rani ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The State of Tamilnadu, rep. By the Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City Police, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent in BDFGISSV No.271/2013 dated 21.06.2013 against the detenu RAJ @ RAJKUMAR, Son of Parthipan aged about 23 years, who is now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu Raj @ Rajkumar before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ashok Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Gov...
United India Insurance Company Vs. Charles
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED:09. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR CMA No.1746 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 M/s.United India Insurance Company Ltd., Namakkal ... Appellant Vs. 1.Charles 2.M.Shanmugam Respondents The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the award & Decree dated 11.10.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.169 of 2001 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Principal Subordinate Judge), Villupuram. For Appellant : Ms.S.Rathi, for M/s.N.Mala JUDGMENT The appeal has been filed by the insurance company challenging the finding fixing negligence on the driver of the Trailor lorry bearing Regn.No.TDG-1251, insured with them, and the quantum of compensation awarded to the injured.2. On the aspect of negligence it is the contention of Ms.S.Rathi, learned counsel representing M/s.United India Insurance Company Ltd., Namakkal, that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the...