Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C.Zophar Jothipaul Vs. 1.The Chief Educational Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD)No.9148 of 2007 & W.P(MD)No.5305 of 2008 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2008 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 1 to 3 of 2009 C.Zophar Jothipaul .. Petitioner in Both W.Ps. Vs. 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District. 2.The Manager, High / Higher Secondary School, Special Schools, C.S.I. Tuticorin - Nazareth Diocese, Caldwell Higher Secondary School Compound, Tuticorin. 3.The Correspondent, Caldwell Higher Secondary School, Tuticorin. 4.D.Rajendran Gnanadurai, CSI Tuticorin - Nazareth Diocese, Caldwell Higher Secondary School Compound, Tuticorin. 5.Rajaselvam, The Headmaster, Caldwell Higher Secondary School Compound, Tuticorin. .. Respondents in W.P(MD)No.9148 o1. The Chief Educational Officer, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District. 2.The Manager, High / Higher Secondary School, Special Schools, C.S.I. Tuticorin - Nazareth Diocese, Caldwell Higher Secondary School Comp...
Miyan Vs. Mariya Arulraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2230 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 Miyan .. Petitioner Vs Mariya Arulraj .. Respondent Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 04.10.2012 made in I.A.No.330 of 2012 in R.C.A.No.45 of 2012 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority / Principal Subordinate Judge, Trichy. !For petitioner ... Mr.R.Devaraj ^For respondent ... Ms.J.Maria Roseline :ORDER Heard both the sides. A resume of facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus: The respondent filed RCOP for eviction of the tenant on the ground of wilful default in paying the rent and also for owners occupation. The Rent Controller ordered eviction on both the grounds, against which R.C.A.No.45 of 2012 was filed by the tenant. The grievance of the revision petitioner is that after the filing of R.C.A., I.A.No.33...
Balaji Enterprises Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:8. 1.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.762 of 2013 M/s.Balaji Enterprises, No.93, Govindappa Naicken Street, Chennai-600 001. ... Petitioner Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Enforcement Roving Squad, Villupuram. ... Respondent Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in G.D.No.24/2012-13 dated 1.1.2013 and quash this detention order as illegal and direct the respondent to release the goods detained. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Baktha Siromoni, For Respondent : Mr.Kanmani Annamalai, Government Advocate (Tax) ----- O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in G.D.No.24/2012-13 dated 1.1.2013 and quash this detention order as illegal and direct the respondent to release t...
M.S.Arasa Kumar Vs. Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08. 01.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Writ Petition No.31921 of 2012 M.S.Arasa Kumar ... Petitioner. vs. 1.The Government of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 3.The Chief Engineer, Highways Department, Government of Tamilnadu, Chennai. 4.The Divisional Engineer (H) Chennai City Road, Government of Tamilnadu, No.394/4, Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus forbearing the Respondents from erecting any Arch on Rajaji Salai and Kamarajar Salai (Beach Road), Chennai including erection of Tamilnadu Assembly's Diamond Jubilee Memorial Arch. For Petitioner : Mrs.C.Dakshayini Reddy for Mr.D.Suresh For Respondents : Mr.A.Navaneetha Krishnan Advocat...
M.P.Palaniappan Vs. C.Rathinasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:08. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.1535 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 M.P.Palaniappan .. Appellant/Defendant -Vs- C.Rathinasamy .. Respondent/Plaintiff (Cause title accepted vide order of this Court dated 30.11.2010 made in M.P.No.1 of 2010 in SA.SR.No.65125 of 2010) Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2010 made in A.S.No.8 of 2010 on the file of Sub Court, Sathyamangalam, Erode District, in confirming the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2007 made in O.S.No.454 of 2004 on the file of District Munsif Court at Sathyamangalam, Erode District. For Appellant : Mr.Ma.P.Thangavel For Respondent : Mr.S.Parthasarathy - - - - - JUDGMENT Notice before admission had been issued and the respondent is also represented by a counsel. The arguments advanced on both sides were heard.2. The sole defendant in the original suit is the appellant. The respondent here...
P.Subramanian Nadar Vs. John Raj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1872 of 2010 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2010 P.Subramanian Nadar .. Petitioner Vs John Raj .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC against the petition and order dated 05.08.2010 made in I.A.No.220 of 2010 in O.S.No.198 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel. !For petitioner ... Mr.H.Thayumanaswamy ^For respondent ... Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar :ORDER Heard both the sides. A resume of facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus: The respondent filed the suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell in respect of an immovable property belonging to the revision petitioner herein. Vakalat was filed, however, written statement was not filed; whereupon, the defendant was set ex-parte and thereafter, E.P. was filed. After receipt of E.P. notice, I.A.No.220 of 2010 was filed t...
M.R.Subramanian Vs. T.K.V.S.L.Mahadevan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1998 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 M.R.Subramanian .. Petitioner Vs T.K.V.S.L.Mahadevan .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, against the fair and decreetal order passed in R.C.A.No.86 of 2001 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Sub-Judge), Madurai dated 22.07.2011, reversing the fair and decreetal order in R.C.O.P.No.341 of 1996 passed by the Rent Controller (Addl.District Munsif), Madurai, dated 31.10.2001. !For petitioner ... Mr.A.Abdul Kadar for M/s.Eddy & Embboss Law Firm ^For respondent ... Mr.R.Subramanian :ORDER Heard both the sides. A resume of facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus: The respondent /landlord herein filed R.C.O.P. under Section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease...
Dr.M.Ponnusamy Vs. University of Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08. 01.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.17262 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Dr.M.Ponnusamy ... Petitioner Versus University of Madras Rep. by its Registrar, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to appoint the petitioner as the Head of the Department of Tamil Language. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent : Mrs.G.Thilagavthi O R D E R This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is a professor in the Department of Tamil Language in University of Madras. In this writ petition, he seeks for a direction to the respondent to appoint him as the Head of the Department of Tamil Language. 2.When the writ petitioner came up for admission on 05.07.2012, this Court directed notice to be served to the learned Standing Counsel for the University of Madras. Accordingl...
N.Chandra Sekar Vs. O.Varadaiah
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08. 01.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Original Side Appeal No.230 of 2012 N.Chandra Sekar ... Appellant Vs. 1.O.Varadaiah 2.Mani ... Respondents. Original Side Appeal is filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 28.02.2012 made in A.No.531 of 2012 in C.S.No.136 of 2008 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr.A.Seshan For Respondent No.1 : Mr.A.S.Vijayaraghavan 2nd Respondent : Given up. JUDGMENT R.BANUMATHI,J This appeal arises out of the order in A.No.531 of 2012 in C.S.No.136 of 2008 in and by which the learned single Judge allowed the amendment application to amend the plaint by including the prayer seeking for declaration that the suit property belongs to the Plaintiff. 1st Defendant is the Appellant. For convenience, the parties are referred as per their array in the suit.2. Plaint...
1.K.Rajendran Vs. 1.Ambikavathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Criminal Revision Case (MD) No.482 of 2012 AND M.P.(MD) No.1 o1. K.Rajendran 2.Parvgathy Ammal ... Petitioners Vs 1.Ambikavathy 2.The Inspector of Police, Valliyoor Police Station, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District in D.V.O.P.No.29 of 2012 vide his order dated 21.09.2012 and set aside the same. !For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Anand ^For Respondent ... Mr.S.Meenakshi Sundaram for R1 Mr.P.Kandasamy, G.A. (Crl. Side) for R2 :ORDER The Petitioners/Respondents have preferred the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 21.09.2012 in D.V.O.P.No.29 of 2012 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoo...