Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.G.Sivanandam Vs. S.Arokyasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:08.01.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN CRP.NPD.No.1704 of 2005 A.G.Sivanandam .... Petitioner Vs. S.Arokyasamy .... Respondent Prayer : This civil revision petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended by Act 1/80, against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.03.2005 in R.C.A.No.2 of 2004, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee, confirming the Order of dismissal dated 31.12.2003 and made in R.C.O.P.No.10 of 2000, on the file of the learned Rent Controller (learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate), Ambattur. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jayabalan For Respondent : Mr.A.R.Nixon O R D E R This memorandum of civil revision is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.03.2005 in R.C.A.No.2 of 2004, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee, confirming the Order of dismissal dated 31.12.2003 and made in R.C.O.P.No.10 of 2000, on ...
T.Ashok Surana Vs. Indian Bank
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:08. 01.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Writ Petition No.420 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 Mr.T.Ashok Surana .... Petitioner Vs. Indian Bank rep. by its Authorised Officer & Chief Manager, ARMB 1 Circle Office Buildings, 55, Ethiraj Salai, Egmore, Chenna008. .... Respondent PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent bank to forfeit the entire payment received by the respondent bank of Rs.121.20 lakhs (Rupees one hundred and twenty one lakhs and twenty thousand only) on the auction sale of the petitioner's residential property namely Old No.5, Anthu Street, Santhome, Chennai -600 004 and credit the same to the home loan account of the petitioner, levy penalty, fine, costs and damages by the respondent bank. For Petitioner : Mr.Ashok Surana Party-in-person ---------- O R D E R (Ord...
1.G.Gopal Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu Rep.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD)No.5505 of 2008 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 o1. G.Gopal 2.C.Rajukumar 3.S.Vijayakumar 4.P.Viswanathan 5.M.Rajendran 6.N.Thavasi 7.B.Angaleeswari 8.K.Thangapadi 9.M.Vasantha Kumar 10.P.Velpandi 11.V.Prabu 12.P.Selvam 13.S.Panchavarnam 14.P.Anantha Pathmanatha Siva 15.O.Gunasekaran 16.G.Baskaran ... Petitioners vs 1.The State of Tamilnadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The Engineer-in-Chief, WRO & Chief Engineer (General), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 3.The Chief Engineer (WRO), Public Works Department, Madurai Region, Madurai-625 002. 4.The Superintending Engineer (WRO), Public Works Department, Periyar Vaigai Basin Division, Madurai. 5.The Executive Engineer (WRO), Public Works Department, Periyar Vaigai Basin Division, Madruai. 6.The Assistant Executive Engineer (WRO), Public Works D...
Vanniaraja Vs. Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD) No.269 of 2011 Vanniaraja ...Appellant vs Inspector of Police, Tharuvaikulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District. .. Respondent (Tharuvaikulam Police station Crime No.118/2008) Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C against the Judgment of conviction and sentence dated 8.8.2011 in S.C.No.261 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Thoothukudi. !For appellant ... Mr.Jagadeesh Pandian State Brief Counsel ^For respondent ... Mr.C.Ramesh, Addl.Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.261 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi. By judgment dated 8.8.2011, the learned Principal Sessions Judge convicted the appellant under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and sentenced him to undergo...
R.Abaranji Chettiar Vs. 1.Vishalakshiammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1602 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012 R.Abaranji Chettiar ... Petitioner/Petitioner/ Appellant Vs 1.Vishalakshiammal 2.Sridhara Sivasubramanian 3.Maheswari Sathyaraj 4.K.Jeganathan 5.Backiyalakshmi ... Respondents/Respondents/ Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order dated 30.04.2012 passed in I.A.No.148 of 2011 in A.S.No.333 of 2004 by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul. !For Petitioners ... Mr.R.Devaraj ^For Respondents ... Mr.G.R.Swaminathan for R.4 & R.5 No representation for R.1 to R.3 * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 30.04.2012 passed in I.A.No.148 of 2011 in A.S.No.333 of 2004 by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respon...
N.Anthanan Vs. 1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD)No.5947 of 2008 N.Anthanan ... Petitioner vs 1.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet, Chennai-15. 2.The Conservator of Forests, Madurai Circle, Madurai. 3.The Divisional Forest Officer, Social Forestry Division, Race Course Road, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.3 to provide the retirement benefits to the petitioner forthwith. !For Petitioner ... Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy ^For Respondents ... Mr.R.Anandaraj Government Advocate :ORDER Both the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties submit that the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous, in view of the fact that the retirement benefit has been paid to the petitioner and the same was also received by him. 2.Recording the said submission, the w...
1. C.Rajakumari Vs. 1. City Union Bank Ltd.,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.41 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 o1. C.Rajakumari 2. A.Raja Rajeswari 3. P.Rajakantham ... Petitioners/Respondents 1 to 3/ Petitioners/Plaintiffs Vs.1. City Union Bank Ltd., Kumbakonam, through its authorized Officer/ Deputy General Manager, Having his central Office at Door NO.49, T.S.R.(Big) Street, Kumbakonam-621 001. ... 1st Respondent/Appellant/ 2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant 2. S.Rajarathinam ... 2nd Respondent/4th Respondent /1st Respondent/2nd Defendant Prayer Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 09.11.2012 made in C.M.A.No.11 of 2011, on the file of the V Additional District Judge, Madurai and to restore the fair and decreetal order dated 28.01.2011 made in I.A.No.48 of 2011 in O.S.No.29 of 2011, on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai. !For Petitioners ... Mr.K.Hema...
Suyambu Vs. State, Rep.by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD).No.214 of 2012 Suyambu .. Appellant vs. State, rep.by The Inspector of Police, Kulasekarapattinam Police Station, Thoothukudi District. .. Respondent Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records in S.C.No.266/2011 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, not II, Thoothukudi and set aside the sentence and conviction passed by the learned Judge on 23.08.2012 and acquit the appellant. !For appellant ... Mr.G.R.Edmund ^For respondent... Mr.C.Ramesh Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) The appellant is the first accused in S.C.No.266 of 2011 on the file of the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi. Altogether, there are two accused. They stood charged for the offences under Sections 302 and 294(b) I...
1.Pakiyathai Vs. 1.Magesh Mani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.302 of 2008 and M.P(MD)No.1 o1. Pakiyathai 2.Pandidurai 3.Muthu Lekshmi 4.Chellasamy 5.Indira 6.Mouna Sundari 7.Rajeshwari 8.Sumathy ... Petitioners/Appellants/ Plaintiffs Vs 1.Magesh Mani 2.Sanmughathai 3.C.Sivakumar ... Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 28.11.2007 passed in I.A.No.87 of 2007 in A.S.No.46 of 2006, by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Tenkasi. !For Petitioners ... Mr.T.S.R.Venkataramana ^For Respondents ... Mr.S.Ramesh alias Ramaiah for R.2 No representation for R.1 and R.3 * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 28.11.2007 passed in I.A.No.87 of 2007 in A.S.No.46 of 2006, by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Tenkasi.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the ...
G.Thangadurai Vs. the State, Rep by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRIMINAL APPEAL (MD).No.605 of 2005 G.Thangadurai ... Appellant Vs. The State, Rep by Inspector of Police, Kambam South Police Station, Crime No.375 of 2001, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondent PRAYER Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in S.C.No.231 of 2003, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, not IV, Madurai, at Periyakulam, dated 03.02.2004 and set aside the same. !For Appellant ... Mr.K.Samidurai Legal Aid Counsel ^For Respondent ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT ************* [Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.] Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant in S.C.No.231 of 2003, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, n...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »