Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State by Vs. 1.Periyasamy S/O Karupannan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD).No.309 of 2005 State by Inspector of Police, Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District .. Appellant Cr.No.102/2001 vs. 1.Periyasamy S/o Karupannan 2.Lakshmi @ Dhanalakshmi W/o. Periyasamy .. Respondents Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code to allow the appeal and set aide the order of acquittal passed by the trial Court, in S.C.No.53/2002 on the file of Additional District Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur and that the accused be convicted of the offence as charged. !For appellant ... Mr.K.S.Duraipandian Additional Public Prosecutor ^For respondents ... Mr.C.Elankaaleeswaran Legal Aid counsel :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) This is an appeal against acquittal filed by the State. The respondents are the accused in S.C.No.53 of 2002 on ...
E.Prabakar Vs. P.Ramadevi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.38 of 2013 E.Prabakar ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs. P.Ramadevi ... Respondent/Respondent Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Principal Subordinate Judge,Trichirapalli to expedite the proceedings pending in H.M.O.P.No.481 of 2011 and pass final order within a period stipulated. !For Petitioner ... Mr.N.Sathish Babu ^ * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.481 of 2011, pending on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge,Trichirapalli.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner.3. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner would echo the cri de coeur and heart burns of his client to the effect that the revision petitioner filed the H.M.O.P.No.481 of 2011 and it is pending for a long time, without any progress. Hence,...
Mariya Singaraj Vs. PoulIn Anbu Selvi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL CRL.R.C.(MD)No.835 of 2007 and M.P.(MD) No.2 of 2007 Mariya Singaraj ... Petitioner Vs Poulin Anbu Selvi ... Respondent PRAYER Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 read with and 407 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 20.08.2007 made in Crl.R.C.No.11 of 2004 reversing the well considered order of the learned Judicial Magistrate in M.C.No.14 of 2006 dated 24.01.2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. !For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Anand ^For Respondent ... Mr.S.Pugalendhi :ORDER The Petitioner/Husband has projected the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 20.08.2007 in Cr.R.C.No.11 of 2006 passed by the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Ramanathapuram, in reversing the order dated 24.01.2006 in M.C.No.14 of 2004 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. 2.The Learned Additional District Judge (Fast Tr...
Rabiathul Bazaria Vs. 1.The Additional Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1389 of 2012 Rabiathul Bazaria .. Petitioner vs 1.The Additional Secretary, Government of India, Department of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution (Department of consumer affairs) Room No.270, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi-110 001. 2.The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 3.The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirapalli City, Tiruchirapalli. 4.The Inspector of Police, Trichy Fort Police Station, Trichy City. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records pertaining to the order of detention passed by the third respondent in his proceedings C.P.O./TC/IS/B.M./D.O.No.09/2012, dated 03.11.2012 and quash the same as illegal and produce the detenu, namely Abdul Hab...
M/S.Madurai Ramnad Bus Owners Association, Vs. S.Janaki Ammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.971 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 M/s.Madurai Ramnad Bus Owners Association, Madurai, No.153, North Veli Street, First Floor, Madurai-625 001, Rep.by its Secretary .. Petitioner Vs S.Janaki Ammal .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, against the order dated 31.01.2012 in R.C.A.No.66 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Sub-Judge, Madurai, confirming the order in R.C.O.P.No.60 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif, Madurai Taluk at Madurai (Rent Controller, Madurai Taluk at Madurai), Madurai dated 31.08.2009. !For petitioner ... Mr.B.Vijayakumar ^For respondent ... Mr.V.P.Rajan :ORDER Heard both the sides. A summation and summarisation of the germane facts which are absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition would run thus: The respondent/landlady filed RCOP...
R.Arumugam Vs. Pr.Palanisamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:08. 01.2013 Coram: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A. No.711 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 R.Arumugam ... Appellant ..vs.. 1.PR.Palanisamy 2.P.Gopalakrishnan ... Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore dated 16.06.2009 made in A.S. No.163 of 2007 setting aside the order of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur dated 31.10.2007 made in I.A.No.1215 of 2007 in O.S.No.322 of 2007. For Appellant ... Mr.P.L.Narayanan For Respondents ... Mr.N.Manokaran (for R1) Mr.M.Guruprasad (for R2) The second defendant in the original suit is the appellant in the second appeal. Plaintiff in the original suit O.S.No.322 of 2007 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruppur, is the first respondent herein and the first defendant in the original suit is the second respondent in the second appeal. The suit was filed by the first respondent PR.Palanis...
Durairaj Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD)No.5777 of 2008 Durairaj ... Petitioner vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai. 2.The Accountant General, Accounts and Entitlement, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018. ... Respondents Prayer Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to settle the sum of Rs.1,92,836/- being the money payable under the head Gratuity and Rs.22,190/- being a sum of General Provident Fund due to the petitioner and all other retirement benefits with 12% interest per annum. !For Petitioner ... Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian ^For 1st Respondent ... Mr.S.Kumar Addl. Government Pleader For 2nd Respondent ... Mr.P.Gunasekaran :ORDER Both the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties inform this court that the amount claimed in this writ petition has been settled by the respondents immediat...
Management of Zion Estate Vs. the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 08 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN W.P.Nos.10993 and 10994 of 2004 The Management of Zion Estate, St.Thomas Mount, Upper Gudalur, Gudalur P.O., Nilgiris District, Rep. by its Managing Partner .. Petitioner in both the petitions vs. 1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore. 2.M.Y.Majidh C/o. The Nilgiris District Estate Workers Union, I.N.T.U.C. Building, Gudalur Bazaar P.O., Nilgiris District. .. Respondents in both the petitions Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the entire records on the file of the first respondent, culminating in the passing of the common order dated 19.11.2003 made in I.D.Nos.411 and 478 of 1990, in so far as the Award in I.D.No.411 of 1990 is concerned and quash the same. For Petitioner ... Mr.Gupta For second Respondent ... Mr.V.Ajoy Khose COMMON ORDER Today, when these writ petition were...
Misha Power Pvt Ltd Vs. Tangedco Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated :08. .01..2013 Coram :: The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Dhanapalan Writ Petition No:13183. of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1,2 and 5 of 2012 Misha Power Pvt. Ltd. Plot No:3. Ganapathy Street Vasantham Nagar Avadi Chennai 071. ... Petitioner -vs- 1. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corp. Ltd. 5th floor, NPKRR Maligai 144 Anna Salai Chennai 002. 2. The Chief Engineer / Design Protection & Communication 2nd floor, MLDC Block 144 Anna Salai Chennai 002. 3. Director R APDRP Power Finance Corporation Urja Nidhi, Barakhamba Lane Connaught Place New Delh001. 4. M/s. Herodex Power Systems Pvt. Ltd. Plot No:38. MIDC Area Satpur Nashi007. ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in issuance of corrigendum dated 18.02.2012 and quash the same and thereby direct the respondent to continue with the tender dated 08.01.2012 ...
K.Subramani Vs. P.Venkatachalam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR C.M.A.No.3767 o1. K.Subramani 2. Sowndaram ... Appellants v.1. P.Venkatachalam 2. N.Govindasamy 3. The Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd., Divisional Office Parimalam Complex E.V.N.Road Erode 11 ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Judgment and decree of the Principal District Judge, of Erode District at Erode (MACT) made in M.C.O.P.No. 509 of 1999, dated 2.2.2001. For Appellants : Mr.Pity S. Parthasarathy for Mr.S.K.Nachimuthu For 3rd Respondent : Mr.J.Chandran In an accident, which occurred on 10.01.1999, son of the respondents died. Legal representatives claimed compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-. The Claims Tribunal has awarded only Rs.54,500/- with interest at the rate of 12% p.a., from the date of order, till the date of realisation. The Claims Tribunal has apportioned the amount equally to the parents. Being aggrieved by ...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »