Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
1.Asraf Nisha Vs. 1.Meer Hasanullaha Shaki Durga
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1785 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 o1. Asraf Nisha 2.N.Jagir Hussain ... Petitioners/Petitioners/ Defendants 1 and 2 Vs. 1.Meer Hasanullaha Shaki Durga Satho Shaheethan Ka Makkan, by its Hereditary Muthavalli Syed Jamal, Pensioners Street, Trichy - 17. ... 1st Respondent/Respondent/ Plaintiff 2.V.M.Hameedha Banu ... 2nd Respondent/Respondent/ 3rd Defendant Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 18.07.2011 made in I.A.No.520 of 2011 in O.S.No.1230 of 2003 on the file of the Court of II Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli. !For Petitioners ... Ms.J.Maria Roseline ^For Respondent s ... Mr.K.S.Sankhar Murali for R.1 No appearance for R.2 * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is focussed to get set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 18.07.2011 made in I.A.No.520 of 2011 in...
Sumathi Vs. Dist Elementary Edul Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :02. 01.2013 CORAM The Honourable Mr. Justice M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.7730 of 2011 Sumathi .. Petitioner vs. 1.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Cuddalore. 2.Mr.Shanmugam 3.Kalaichitra .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to forbear the 2nd respondent from appointing the 3rd respondent as Elementary School Teacher in the 2nd respondent School and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct fair interview in accordance with law. ----- For petitioner : Mr.M.Selvam For respondents : Mr.P.Karthikeyan, Government Advocate for R.1 Mrs.Rita Chandrasekar for R.2 Mr.K.Srinivasan for R.3 ----- O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. The petitioner has stated that she had completed her Diploma in Teachers Education from Chandra Teachers Training School, Sethiyathope, Cuddalore D...
A.Sundar Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P(MD)No.11728 of 2009 and M.P.(MD)No.2 fo 2009 A.Sundar ... Petitioner vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Chief Engineer (General) Highways Department, Chennai. 2.The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Supervising Engineer, Highways Department, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Ku.No.6432/2008/Aa5, dated 05.01.2009 on the file of the respondent No.2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondent No.2 refix the petitioner's original seniority by regularising the service period of four days from 27.11.1997 to 30.11.1997 and ...
1.Kunjamma Vs. 1.Larence John
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.2629 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 o1. Kunjamma 2.Titus John .. Petitioners Vs 1.Larence John 2.Soudamini Amma 3.Sadasivan Pillai 4.Dharmaraj 5.Sajitha Kumari 6.Sreedharan 7.Helan Hepsy Boy 8.Oormila Devi .. Respondents Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., against the order and decreetal order dated 17.08.2012 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai, made in I.A.No.143 of 2009 in A.S.S.R.No.1351 of 2007. !For petitioners... Mr.K.N.Thampi ^For respondents... No appearance :ORDER The learned counsel for the revision petitioners would echo the heart- burns of his clients to the effect that they presented the Appeal Memorandum in A.S.S.R.No.1351 of 2007 and I.A.No.177 of 2007 to get the delay of 74 days condoned in filing the Appeal Memorandum. However, that was dismissed for default, whereupon, I.A.No.143 of 2009 was filed for getting the I.A., restored whi...
K.P.A.Manokaran... Rev Vs. A.Subbulakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.2681 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 K.P.A.Manokaran ... Revision Petitioner/Petitioner/ Plaintiff Vs. A.Subbulakshmi ... Respondent/Respondent/Defendant Prayer Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 09.11.2012 made in I.A.No.442 of 2012 in O.S.No.393 of 2010, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul. !For Petitioner ... Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai for Mr.J.Lawrence ^For Respondent ... Mr.R.J.Karthick for Mr.R.Subramanian * * * * * :ORDER The Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 09.11.2012 passed in I.A.No.442 of 2012 in O.S.No.393 of 2010 by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul.2. Heard both sides.3. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner would echo the cri de coeur and heart burns of his client which could succinctly...
A. Stephen Raj Vs. the State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL CRL.R.C.(MD)No.648 of 2012 A. Stephen Raj ... Petitioner Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Chinnakovilankulam Police Station Tirunelveli District. ... Respondent PRAYER Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 read with and 401 (1) of Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the judgment delivered by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District in C.C.No.487 of 2011 vide his judgment dated 20/9/2012 and set aside the same in so far as it relates to the observation of the Learned trial Judge as "Benefit of Doubt" and consequently the petitioner may be declared as "Honorably Acquitted" in the above said case. !For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Anand ^For Respondent ... Mr.P.Kandasamy, GA (Criminal Side) - - - - - :ORDER The Petitioner/sole Accused has projected the instant Criminal Revision Petition as against the Judgme...
S.Mahalingam Vs. Vasan Publications Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:02. 01.2013 CORAM :: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN O.S.A. No.446 of 2012 S.Mahalingam : Appellant versus 1. Vasan Publications Pvt. Ltd. rep. By its Chairman/ Managing Director/Executive Director, No.757, Anna Salai, Chenna002. 2. B.Srinivasan, Managing Director/Director, Vasan Publications Pvt. Ltd., No.757, Anna Salai, Chenna002. 3. Vikatan Pressuram, rep. By its Proprietor/Partner/Director, No.757, Anna Salai, Chenna002. : Respondents Appeal filed against the Fair and Decretal Order of this Court dated 9 November 2012 in O.A.No.661 of 2012 in C.S.No.522 of 2012. For appellant : Mr.R.Gandhi, Senior Counsel, Assisted by Mr.Muthukumar, for M/s.G.M.S.Law Associates For respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel, for Mr.N.Ramesh K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.This intra court appeal is directed against the order and decretal order dated 9 November 2012 in O.A.No.661 of 2012 in C.S.No.522 of 2012, di...
P.Kumaresan... Petit Vs. Kalyani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA C.R.P.(NPD)(MD)No.1949 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012 P.Kumaresan ... Petitioner/Appellant/ Petitioner/Tenant Vs. Kalyani ... Respondent/Respondent/ Respondent/Landlady Prayer Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 09.07.2012 passed in R.C.A.No.5 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul, confirming the order dated 12.04.2010 passed in R.C.O.P.No.1 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Nilakottai. !For Petitioner ... Mr.A.Sivaji ^For Respondent ... Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar * * * * * :ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is focussed to get set aside the judgment and decree dated 09.07.2012 passed in R.C.A.No.5 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul, confirming the order dated 12.04.2010 passed in R.C.O.P.No.1 of 2008 on the fil...
Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Rajam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.728 of 2004 Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Pudukottai. .. Appellant vs 1.Rajam 2.Kavitha 3.Thamizhmani 4.Akila 5.Valli 6.Gabriel (6th respondent ex-parte in lower Court) .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2002, made in M.C.O.P.No.324 of 1999, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Fast Track Court, Pudukottai. !For Appellant ... Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan ^For Respondent ... Mr.R.P.Ramachandiran for R1 to R4 Mr.A.Jahagir Badhusa for R5 ex-parte for R6 :JUDGMENT The appellant/2nd respondent has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.(MD).No.728 of 2004, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Fast Track Court, Pudukottai., for claiming compensation a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- from t...
C. Sajit Lovely Vs. V. Yesu Rajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL CRL.R.C.(MD)No.653 of 2012 C. Sajit Lovely ... Petitioner Vs V. Yesu Rajan ... Respondent PRAYER Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 read with and 401 (1) of Cr.P.C., against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.7202 of 2011 in S.T.C.No.1309 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kuzhithurai dated 9/11/2012. !For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Meenakshi Sundaram ^ - - - - - :ORDER The Revision Petitioner/Accused has focused the present Criminal Revision Petition as against the order dated 9/11/2012 in Crl.M.P.No.7202 of 2011 in S.T.C.No.1309 of 2011 passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate not I, Kuzhithurai in dismissing the petition filed by the Revision Petitioner/Petitioner under Section 245 (2) of Cr.P.C.2. The Learned Judicial Magistrate not I, Kuzhithurai, while passing the impugned order dated 9/11/2012 in Cr.M.P.No.7202 of 2011 in S.T.C.No.1309 of 2011 has ...