Chennai Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Padma Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1428 of 2012 Padma .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakmari District, Kanyakumari. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Aralvai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 4.Ganesan 5.Manoharan 6.Basil Rajan .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the body of the petitioner brother, Mani (male), (aged about 45 years) before this Court and to set him at liberty. !For petitioner ... Mr.S.Murugan ^For respondents 1 to 3... Mr.R.Ramachandran, Additional Public Prosecutor For respondents 4 & 5 ... Mr.T.Poovanalingam For 6th respondent ... Mr.A.S.Vaigunth :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) The petitioner is the sister of one Mr...
S.Balakrishnan Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1461 of 2012 S.Balakrishnan .. Petitioner vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep.by The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-09. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli City, Tiruchirappalli. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records in detention order passed in C.P.O/T.C./I.S./DO.No.61/2012, dated 11.09.2012, on the file of the second respondent herein and set aside the same as illegal and direct the respondents to produce the body of the petitioner's son namely Navinkumar, son of S.balakrishnan, aged 24 years, before this Court and set him at liberty from Central Prison, Trichirappalli. !For petitioner ... Mr.K.A.S.Prabhu ^For respondents ... Mr.C.Ramesh Additional ...
J.Sumathi Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1523 of 2012 J.Sumathi .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Koodal Puthur Police Station, Madurai. 3.Jeya 4.Thangamani 5.Lakshmi .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the body of the petitioner's husband Jhonson, aged about 45 years before this Court and set him at liberty. !For petitioner ... Mr.R.Rajamohan ^For respondents ... Mr.R.Ramachandran for R1 and R2 Additional Public Prosecutor :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to produce the detenu, namely, Jhonson, aged about 45 years, the husband of the petitioner, before this Court and to set ...
R.Ganesan Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1528 of 2012 R.Ganesan .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti West Polcie, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District. 3.Murugan 4.Veyilumuthu .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the detenue, byname, Shanmugakani, aged 20 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. !For petitioner ... Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan ^For respondents 1and2... Mr.R.Ramachandran, Additional Public Prosecutor :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) The petitioner is the husband of one Shanmugakani, aged 20 years. According to the petitioner, his wife has been found missing from 29.10.2012 onwards. In this regard, he has made a complaint ...
N.R.Gayathri Vs. Director of Social Welfare
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:9. 1-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.27384 of 2012 N.R.Gayathri ... Petitioner Versus The Director of Social Welfare Chennai 2. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order of the respondent herein passed in Na.Ka.No.27580/Admn2(3)/2012 dated 13.9.2012 rejecting the petitioner's request to proceed on voluntary retirement with effect from 9.11.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to go on voluntary retirement with effect from 9.11.2012 with all terminal and service benefits within a stipulated time. For Petitioner :- Mr. Ravi Shanmugam For Respondents :- Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Spl. Govt. Pleader O R D E R The petitioner is employed as a Superintendent in the Social Welfare Department. She opted to retir...
Farwood Industries Ltd Vs. D.Harikrishnan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:09. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.1264 of 2012 M/s.Farwood Industries Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director M.F.Farooq No.4/605, Old Mahabalipuram Road Perungudi Chenna096. .. Appellant -Vs- D.Harikrishnan .. Respondent Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree of the II Additional Judge, City Civil Court dated 17.09.2012 in A.S.No.394 of 2011 confirming the judgment and decree of the III Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai in O.S.No.1620 of 2009 dated 30.06.2011. For appellant : Mr.S.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.M.V.Chandran ----- JUDGMENT The defendant in the original suit O.S.No.1620 of 2009 on the file of III Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai is the appellant herein. The respondent herein is the owner of the building shown as the suit property. Admittedly, the suit property was taken for rent by the appellant herein from the respondent for a monthly rent of...
Yusuf Sulaiga Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P(MD)No.1310 of 2012 Yusuf Sulaiga .. Petitioner vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise (XVI) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai-9. 2.The Commissioner of Police, O/o.the Commissioner Police, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli -627 009. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records connected with the detention order in No.129/BDFGISSV/2012, dated 28.09.2012 on the file of the respondent No.2 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner's husband Thasin @ Mohamed Thasin S/o.Ghouse Maideen, aged about 32 years now confined at Central Prison, Palayamkottai before this Court. !For petitioner ... Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah ^For ...
P.Marimuthu Vs. Managing Director of Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corpor ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:09. 01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.NO.6518 OF 201.P.Marimuthu .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. CMDA Tower II, IV Floor, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chenna008. 2.The Senior Regional Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (Coimbatore Region) Near Kavundampalayam, Coimbatore 30. 3.The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (Coimbatore Region) Sooriyampalayam, Erode. .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.19722/R-1/2009 dated 26.11.2010 confirming the orders of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.2854/07/A1 dated 01.10.2007 and 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.16/05/R5 dated 27.04.2005 and quash the same in respect of the petitioner herein and consequently direct the respondents ...
Jannath Banu Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD).No.1344 of 2012 Jannath Banu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XVI) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner Police, Kokkira kulam, Tirunelveli 009. ... Respondents Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the entire records connected with the detention order in No.136/BDFGISSV/2012, dated 10.10.2012 on the file respondent No.2 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner's husband Thameemul Ansari @ I.T, S/o.Shahul Hameed aged about 34 years now confined at Central Prison, Palayamkottai before this Court and set him at liberty forthwi...
K.Nagu Vs. State Represented by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:09. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD).No.315 of 2011 K.Nagu .. Appellant vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kaneekarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram .. Respondent Cr.No.458/2008 Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code to call for records in S.C.No.101/2009 on the file of Principal District and Sessions Court, Ramanathapuram, dated 20.01.2010 and set aside the same. !For appellant ... Mr.V.Kathirvelu Senior Counsel for Mr.S.M.S.Johnny Basha ^For respondent ... Mr.C.Ramesh Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.101 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram. He stood charged for the offence under Section 302 IPC. The trial Court by judgment, dated 20.01.2010, convict...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »