Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
L.HemalathA. Vs. the Collector, and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Prayer:This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondents in proceedings Ou.Mu.C6/13400/2011 dated 12.02.2012 and quash the same and to direct the respondents to grant a patta in respect of property having an extent of 1800 sq.ft bearing Plot No.52 comprised in S.No.524/3B, Vadamambakkam Village, Arakkonam Taluk known as Green Park Avenue after subdividing the same in the name of the petitioner.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. It has been stated that the petitioner is the owner of the land, bearing plot No. 52, comprised in S.No.524/3B, Vadamambakkam Village, Arakkonam Taluk, having an extent of 1800 square feet. She had purchased the said property, by way of a registered Sale Deed, bearing Document No.1228/2006, on the file of the Joint Sub-Registrar No.2, ...
Loganatha Mudaliar. Vs. Raghunathlal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Civil revision petitions filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 18/1960 as amended by Act 23/1973 as against the common judgment and decrees dated 17.02.2012 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Vellore, in R.C.A.Nos.10/2007, 12 of 2007 and 2 of 2008 in (i) reversing the fair and decreetal order dated 05.04.2007 in RCOP No.36 of 1999, (ii) partly allowing the order and decree dated 05.04.2007 in RCOP No.36 of 1999 and (iii) confirming the order and decree dated 05.04.2007 in RCOP No.85 of 1999 passed by the learned Principal District Munsif (Rent Controller), Vellore.COMMON ORDER1. Animadverting upon the common judgment and decrees dated 17.02.2012 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Vellore, in R.C.A.Nos.10/2007, 12 of 2007 and 2 of 2008 in (i) reversing the fair and decreetal order dated 05.04.2007 in RCOP No.36 of 1999, (ii) partly allowing the order and decree d...
Mrs.Visalam Swamy. Vs. the Corporation of Chennai and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to receive and process the petitioners application for planning permission at Block Nos.60 and 61, R.K.Shanmugam Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai-78 without insisting upon "No Objection Certificate" from the third respondent.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to receive and process the petitioners application for planning permission at Block Nos.60 and 61, R.K.Shanmugam Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai-78 without insisting upon "No Objection Certificate" from the third respondent.2. Mr.V.C.Selvasekaran, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the first respondent and Mr.P.Tamilmani, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the second respondent.3. Petitioners are owners of the property which was originally developed by Tamil Nadu Housing Board and sold to the individuals. The present owner...
Ms.Colorplus Fashions Ltd. Vs. the Controller of Legal Metrology
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order dated 01.03.2005 Ref.No.SWMEA/SA/PCR/GENL/ Distt. South/ILM-04/915-916/2785 and the consequential order dated 01.04.2005 Ref. No. SWME/SA/PCR/GENL/Distt.South/ILM-04/915-916/3451 passed by the respondent authority and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent authority, to permit the petitioner company to continue its sale of packed wallets by displaying the cost of materials in the label permanently affixed to the packing as permitted under Section 39(3) of the Standards of Weight and Measures Act, 1976.O R D E R1. The petitioner seeks to quash the impugned order dated 01.03.2005 and the consequential order dated 01.04.2005 passed by the respondent authority and consequently, direct the respondent authority, to permit the petitioner company to continue its sale of packed wallets by displaying the cost o...
R.Balambal. Vs. the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 24.04.2009 passed by the second respondent vide letter No.R1/3003/2009 as confirmed by the first respondent vide G.O.(30 years) No.13 dated 13.02.2012 and quash the same and further direct the first respondent to accord sanction for reclassification of the lands belonging to the petitioner comprised in S.Nos.241/2B, 2A2 and Survey No.246/2A of Varadharajapuram Village within limits of Kundrathur Panchayat Union.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 24.04.2009 passed by the second respondent vide letter No.R1/3003/2009 as confirmed by the first respondent vide G.O.(30 years) No.13 dated 13.02.2012 and quash the same and further direct the first respondent to accord sanction for reclassification of the lands ...
A.Periyasamy. Vs. the Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
PrayerWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to grant permission to conduct the dance program on 11.7.2012 between 9 p.m. during festival in Sri Mariamman Koil at Thirumanur Adi Dravida Colony, Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District, based on petitioner's representation dated 2.7.2012 made to the second respondent.O R D E R1. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition as not pressed.2. In the light of the above submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs....
The Commissioner of Income Tax. Vs. Ms.Forbes Campbell Finance Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
PRAYER: Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.148 to 155 of 2005 are filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'A', dated 13.07.2004 in ITA Nos.1623, 1624/Mds/96, 319/Mds/95, 1012, 1013/Mds/97, 1414/Mds/98 & 630/Mds/2000 relating to the Assessment Years 1990-91, 1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-96 & 1997-98.JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J.) 1. These Tax Cases arise out of the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, relating to the assessment years 1990-91 to 1997-98. The following are the substantial questions of law arising in these Tax Case Appeals filed by the Revenue:(i) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in treating the provision for installation and service charges as a provision for an ascertained liability and hence an allowable deduction?(ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, whether pr...
Rajendran. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 12.07.2002, made in S.C.No.147 of 2000 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.II, Gobichettipalayam. J U D G M E N T1. The criminal appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 12.07.2002, made in S.C.No.147 of 2000 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.II, Gobichettipalayam, whereby the accused was convicted for the offence under Section 366A IPC and sentenced to undergo four years rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs.500/- in default in payment to undergo three months rigorous imprisonment.2. The respondent has filed a final report stating that on 18.01.1999, at 11.00 hours, the accused had kidnapped a minor girl namely, Jayanthi @ chitra, aged about 17 years, who was under the custody of her parents and took her to Kodumudi Magudeshwaran Temple and marri...
Ponnanancha Perumal. Vs. the Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Original Application filed under Section 9 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, praying to call for the records in pursuant to the Impugned Order passed by the first Respondent in P.R.No.21/2000 dated 14.8.2000 and the Appellate Order passed by the second Respondent in Proc.C.No.B1/Appeal 52/2000 dated 30.11.2000, and quash these orders and consequently, direct the Respondents to grant all increments to the petitioner as per Rules, has been transferred to this Court on the abolition of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal and renumbered as writ petition.O R D E R1. The petitioner while working as Grade I Constable, was served with the charge memo vide P.R.No.21/2000 under Rule 3(b)of Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service (Disciplinary & Appeal) Rules, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rule').2. The allegations against petitioner was that, he was found under the influence of liquor, on duty and that when the Sub-Inspector was signing the Beat Book, the petitioner took awa...
Dr.i.Veeramani. Vs. the Director of Medical and Rural
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the first respondent to promote the petitioner to the post of Senior Civil Surgeon in Tamil Nadu Medical Services, with retrospective effect from 13.12.2001 being the date on which promotions were made for the year 2001-2002 and due to the petitioner, with all consequential benefits, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.O R D E R1. The petitioner joined the service in pursuance to the selection by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission on 10.09.1981.2. The petitioner applied for leave from 09.08.1991 to 13.07.1993 for treatment of his son suffering from chronic hepatic Coma.3. The petitioner was served with charge memo under 17(b) of Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Disciplinary & Appeal) Rules on 15.07.1997. The enquiry officer was appointed to hold the enquiry, regarding to misconduct of the petitioner for absent from duty from 09.08...