Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Padmashree Polytechnic College. Vs. the All India Council for Technica ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the impugned order of the 3rd respondent dated 15.05.2012 and quash the same and further directing the respondents to grant approval for the Padmashree Polytechnic College, a unit of Prof.Sundaram Educational Trust based on its application No.1-755778292 dated 9.2.2012 effective from the academic year 2012-2013.(Prayer amended as per order dated 21.06.2012 by KCJ in M.P.Nos.3 and 4/2012)O R D E R1. The petitioner College run by a Trust has filed the present writ petition seeking to challenge an order passed by the first respondent All India Council for Technical Education ("AICTE" for short) dated 16.05.2012 and after setting aside the same seeks for a direction to grant approval for the Polytechnic run by them based on the application dated 09.02.2012.2. Subsequently, the petitioner has filed an application in M.P.No.3 of 2012 to amend the prayer and that appli...
Mr.Bosco Fernandes. Vs. Ms.Elgi Equipments Rep.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2012
Prayer :-Criminal Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to set-aside the order passed in C.M.P.No.54 of 2010 in C.A.No.181 of 2009, dated 19.08.2010 on the file of Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court-I, Coimbatore.ORDER1. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-The respondent herein / complainant had filed a case in C.C.No.87 of 2004, on the file of Judicial Magistrate-III, Coimbatore, against the revision petitioner herein / accused for the offence under Sections 138, 141 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act, stating that the accused ordered a machinery viz., 'JCP V 3D' with its accessories on 22.07.2002. As per the order of the accused, the complainant supplied the machinery with its accessories on 30.07.2002, worth about Rs.13,13,000/-, to the accused. In that aspect, the accused has to pay the balance amount of Rs.8,13,000/- to the complainant. Therefore, the accused had issued a cheque for a sum of Rs.1,35,500/- as part payment, drawn on...
M.K.Anandakumar. Vs. K.Chidambaram
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2012
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking speedy disposal of E.A.No.255 of 2009 in E.P.No.117 of 2006 pending before the learned I Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore.ORDER1. This civil revision petition is focussed, seeking early disposal of E.A.No.255 of 2009 in E.P.No.117 of 2006 pending before the learned I Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. A thumbnail sketch of the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this revision would run thus:The decree holder filed E.P. for obtaining delivery. It appears delivery was ordered; whereupon, the following three E.As. were filed:"(1) E.A.No.253 of 2009: For stay order until receiving the copy application and the proceeding until expiry of limitation of filing appeal; (2) E.A.No.255 of 2009: To consider the obstruction petition and the objections raised and suspend the order passed to delivery of possession in the execution pe...
Sumathy Anbarasu. Vs. the Sub Registrar, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-12-2012
W.P.No.4180 of 2011 is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned deed of cancellation of sale deed, dated 27.07.2007 executed by the third respondent's power agent, 2nd respondent and presented to and registered by 1st respondent as document No.9997 of 2007 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently to direct the first respondent to delete the entry of cancellation deed of sale dated 27.07.2007, document No.9997 of 2010 registered before him within a time frame fixed by the court.W.P.No.4181 of 2011 is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned deed of cancellation of settlement deed dated 27.07.2007 executed by the third respondent's power agent, the second respondent and presented to and registered by t...
The Union of India Owning Southern Railway. Vs. the Addl. Registrar, R ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
PRAYER: Appeal against the order dated 22.04.2009 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench in O.A.No.2008/1994.J U D G M E N T1. This appeal has been directed by the Southern Railway as against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench, ordering a compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- to respondents 2 and 3, who are parents of one Bakkiyaraj, who died in a train accident.2. On 24.08.2007, Bakkiyaraj, then 24 years old, travelled in Train No.6607 Chennai-Mangalore Express from Chennai to Karur. The train had an unscheduled halt at Veeravakiyam Railway Station. After some time, the train started moving. He fell down from the moving train and died on the spot. According to his parents, in the train, as there was much crowd, he was standing near the entrance of the compartment, abruptly, the train started from Veeravakiyam Railway Station, due to the jerking and jolting of the train, the door of the compartment, which was kept open, dashed on his head, he slipped and fell...
V.P.Kalairajan. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 6 herein to transfer the criminal case registered by the fifth respondent, the Inspector of Police, Orathanadu Police Station, Orathanadu, Tanjore District in Crime No.137 of 2007 to the 7th respondent, C.B.I. and further direct the 7th respondent to investigate the said case within a time frame and submit a report to the court.ORDER1. The petitioner who was a sitting MLA at the relevant time representing T.Nagar Legislative Assembly constituency, has filed the present writ petition seeking for a direction to respondents 1 to 6 to transfer the criminal case registered by the fifth respondent Inspector of Police, Orathanadu Police Station, Thajavur District in Crime No.137 of 2007 to the 7th respondent CBI and further to direct the 7th respondent to investigate the case within the time frame.2. When the matter came up for admission on ...
Priyanka Rajkumar. Vs. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan's And Ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to consider and admit Sujay, R. for L.K.G. Class in the first respondent's school on the basis of his application to L.K.G. Class, as it is the legal duty of the respondents to give effect to the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 (Act 35 of 2009) and under Article 21 and 21A of the Constitution.ORDER1. On behalf of the minor son Sujay, his mother has filed the present writ petition seeking for a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to consider and admit her son in the L.K.G. class in the first respondent school on the basis of her application as the legal duty was cast upon the respondents under the provisions of the Right of Children for Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (for short RCE Act) as well as under Articles 21 and 21A of the Constitution.2. This writ petition when it ca...
R.Devadoss. Vs. the District Collector, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records of the proceedings of the first respondent in R.C.No.24421/2010-1/A4 dated 23.12.2010 and quash the same and consequently reinstate the petitioner in the same post with all consequential benefits.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records of the proceedings of the first respondent in R.C.No.24421/2010-1/A4 dated 23.12.2010 and quash the same and consequently reinstate the petitioner in the same post with all consequential benefits.2. Mr.R.Kannan, learned counsel for the petitioner appears in robes despite advocates boycott of the Court.3. Heard Mr.R.Kannan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.4. The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of suspension ...
R.RadhA. Vs. A.S.ibrahim Rawather
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
Prayer: Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure to implead the applicant as the second defendant in the suit in C.S.No.506 of 2005.O R D E R1. This application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure to implead the applicant as the second defendant in the suit in C.S.No.506 of 2005.2. The applicant is a third party to the suit in C.S.No.506 of 2005. According to the applicant, she had purchased the property, in respect of which the suit has been filed by the first respondent/plaintiff seeking the relief of specific performance, under a registered sale deed dated 30.11.2006 for a total sale consideration of Rs.79,20,000/- and the sale in her favour has been suppressed by the second respondent for the reasons best known to him.3. The first respondent and the second respondent had entered into an agreement of sale dated 1...
Sudhir VasudevA. Vs. M.George Ravi Shekeran and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
Memorandum of Grounds of Contempt Appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the order dated 19.01.2012 made in Contempt Petition No.161 of 2010.JUDGMENTD.MURUGESAN, J.1. This contempt appeal is directed against the order dated 19.1.2012 passed in Contempt Petition No.161 of 2010.2. The factual matrix leading to the filing of the present contempt appeal are as follows. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as "the Corporation"), a Public Sector Undertaking under the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India, is having its oil and natural gas exploration and exploitation sites, both on-shore and off-shore, at various places all over the country. The Corporation was having in its employment the regular posts of Marine Assistant Radio Operators, Marine Radio Operators, Marine Radio Officers, Senior Marine Radio Officers for manning the radio network and communication equipment at drill sites. The Corporation also engaged...