Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Velliyan Vs. the Proprietor, Columbia Electronics
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jul-06-2012
(The appeal having come before us for final hearing on 27.06.2012, upon hearing the arguments of appellant/complainant side and perused the documents, written submission as well as the order of the District Forum, this Commission made the following :-) A.K. ANNAMALAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER. 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 2. The complainant entrusted his T.V. set for service to the opposite party with replacement of certain parts and after the service as the complainant not satisfied with the same and found certain deficiency in service even after payment of service charges of Rs.2645/- filed this consumer complaint in which the opposite party denied the allegations that there was no such selling spare parts on the particular day and no service was done and thereby after an enquiry on the basis of both sides materials, the District Forum came to the conclusion that the complainant failed to establish his case for deficiency of service and thereby dismissed the complaint. 3...
A.Prakash. Vs. the Commissioner and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Prayer:This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Respondent dated 14.10.2010 and made in Na.Ka.No.444/2010/F1 and quash the order of the Respondent as illegal and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the Respondent to grant planning permission for the construction of the residential house in Survey No.1178/3A/2A as per patta No.396, Plot No.192A, Layout Plan No.26/70 situate at 34, Madhavaram Village, Saidapet Taluk, Chennai.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents.2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner had applied to the first respondent, for the grant of building permission, for the construction of a residential house, in Survey No.1178/3A/2A, by way of his applications, dated 20.07.2010 and 07.10.201...
K.Dakshinamoorthy. Vs. D.Viswanathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC. as against the judgment and decree, dated 21.11.2005, passed by the Subordinate Judge at Kanchipuram, in A.S.No.6 of 2005, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 24.09.2002, passed in O.S.No.124 of 1999, by the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Uthiramerur.J U D G M E N T1. The suit was filed by the plaintiffs/appellants herein seeking ---a) for declaration of title of ABCD portion of the suit property as shown in the plaint sketch and for recovery of possession of the removal of the superstructure;b) for declaration of title of CDEF portion of the suit property and for consequential injunction restraining the defendant and their men or agent from in any manner encroaching upon or interfering with the CDEF portion of the suit property;The learned trial Court in O.S.No.124 of 1999, dated 24.09.2002, had dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs. As against that, when an appeal was preferred by the plaintiffs, the same was dismissed b...
Ms.Manju Build Mart. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent in proceedings No.Na.Ka.No.359/2012, quash the impugned order dated 11.06.2012 and consequentially direct the first respondent to provide opportunity of being heard for passing any order.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent in proceedings No.Na.Ka.No.359/2012, quash the impugned order dated 11.06.2012 and consequentially direct the first respondent to provide opportunity of being heard for passing any order.2. Ms.V.M.Velumani, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for disposal.3. Petitioner claims that he is holding a letter of permission dated 18.1.2008 in Na.Ka.No.676/2007 to manufacture and sale of hollow blocks and that permission has been ...
The Controller of Examination. Vs. P.Muralitharan and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
PRAYER Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 14.02.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.13323 of 2011 on the file of this Court.R.BANUMATHI, J1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 14.2.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.13323 of 2011 quashing the proceedings of the appellant in Memo Ref.AUTT/COE/2011/132 dated 07.10.2011 and consequently, directing the appellant university to issue examination Mark Sheet for IV Semester and Provisional Certificate to the first respondent herein, the appellant has preferred this appeal.2. In the said Writ Petition, the contention of the writ petitioner/first respondent herein is that she completed Diploma in Instrumentation and Control Engineering (I.C.E) in the year 2006 and she passed B.E. (Computer Science and Engineering) in the year 2009. Thereafter, she joined M.E. (Computer Science Engineering) full time course in Jeyaram College of Engineering and Technology, Karattampatti and that she successfully completed her M.E. Course...
Dr.S.Narayanaswamy Vs. the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Chennai-6 in Na.Ka.No.44725/KaPi2/1/2011 dated 20.9.2011 in rejecting the claim for interest on the belated payment of terminal benefits quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the terminal benefits from the date of superannuation 21.12.2007 to actual date of disbursement of terminal benefits within short date that may be fixed by this Court.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned.2. It has been stated that the petitioner had retired from service, as Deputy Director (Leprosy) Government Hospital, Dindigul. The petitioner had filed the present writ petition claiming interest, at the rate of 18% per annum, on the belated payment of terminal benefits due to h...
Minor Vinothini. Vs. S.Selvaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
This civil revision petition is preferred under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure as against the fair and decreetal orders dated 26.08.2011 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram in I.A.No.325 of 2011 in O.S.No.66 of 2007.ORDER1. Heard both sides.2. Animadverting upon the order dated 26.08.2011 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram in I.A.No.325 of 2011 in O.S.No.66 of 2007, this civil revision petition has been focussed.3. A thumbnail sketch of the germane facts, in a few broad strokes, can be encapsulated thus:The revision petitioners herein/plaintiffs filed the suit as against the respondent/defendant and the trial court passed the decree as under:"1. that the plaintiffs each are entitled to Rs.1,000/- per month as maintenance amount against the first defendant.2. that charge is created in respect of item No.4 of the properties.3. with regard to other reliefs, the suit is dismissed.4. that there be no order as to cost."(extracted as such)After the...
K.Thirukumaran. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Writ Petition No.11134 of 2008 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to retrospectively promote the petitioner in the cadre of Health Inspector with effect from 01.07.1971 and consequently regularize his services in the above post with all monetary benefits by extending the benefits of G.O.(D) No.359, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 26.04.2004 which is covered under order dated 13.07.2007 in W.P.No.29794 of 2005 etc.,COMMON ORDER1. Writ Petition No.11134 of 2008 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to retrospectively promote the petitioner in the cadre of Health Inspector with effect from 01.07.1971 and consequently regularize his services in the above post with all monetary benefits by extending the benefits of G.O.(D) No.359, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 26.04.2004 which is covered under order dated 13.07.2007 in W.P.No.29794 of 2005 etc.,2. T...
Hosur Ashok Leyland. Vs. A. Dennis and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to seta side the order passed in I.A. No: 881 of 2011 in O.S. No: 185 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No: 1, Hosur, dated 02.01.2012.O R D E R1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order of the learned District Judge No: 1, Hosur, made in I.A. No: 6881 of 2011 in O.S. No: 185 of 2011 dated 02.01.2012.2. The matter concerns with the Trade Union Election. The first petitioner is the Hosur Ashok Leyland Unit-II Employees Union represented by its General Secretary and the second petitioner is the Vice President of the 1st petitioner association. The first respondent is the contestant who filed a suit praying to pass a decree and judgment to grant an injunction directing the defendant to stay the further proceedings of sworn in function proposed to be held on 31.08.2011 and repolling scheduled on 17.09.2011 till the disposal of the suit and directing the defendant to...
Union of IndiA. Vs. the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
Prayer:- Writ petition file under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records pertaining to the order of the first respondent Tribunal, made in O.A.No.598 of 2009, dated 27.09.2010 and quash the same.O R D E R(Order of the Court was made by Justice Elipe Dharma Rao)1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition challenging the order, dated 27.09.2010, made in O.A.No.598 of 2009, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, whereby and whereunder the original application, which was filed by the second respondent herein against the order rejecting his representation seeking revision of seniority, passed by the second petitioner herein, dated 18.05.2009, was allowed and the respondents therein, who are the petitioners herein, were directed to assign the seniority of the applicant as per Paragraph 303 of Indian Railway Establishment Manuel and RBE No.107/94 (Supplementary Circular No.34) based on the marks obtain...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »