Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.D.Rajendran. Vs. G.Masilamani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
This civil revision petition is preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the entire E.P proceedings in E.P.No.21 of 2011 in O.S.No.139 of 2010 pending on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Vaniyambadi.ORDER1. Heard both sides.2. This civil revision petition has been focussed so as to set aside the entire E.P proceedings in E.P.No.21 of 2011 in O.S.No.139 of 2010 pending on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Vaniyambadi.3. The pith and marrow, the gist and kernel of the germane facts, in a few broad strokes, can be encapsulated thus:The respondent herein happened to be the decree holder, who filed the E.P seeking execution of the sale deed by the court in his favour and for delivery of the property concerned based on the exparte decree for specific performance.4. According to the learned counsel for the respondent/decree holder, notice was sent to the judgment debtor and there was no response. Hence, the exparte decree was passed. Whereupon, ...
M.Chinnasamy. Vs. the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
W.P.Nos.14116 to 14118 of 2008: Writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to give the permanent Sanitary Worker post to the petitioners.COMMON ORDER1. This order shall disposed of W.P.Nos.14116,14117 and 14118 of 2008 as common question of law and facts are involved in these writ petitions.2. For the sake of brevity, facts are taken from W.P.No.14116 of 2008.3. The petitioners in all these writs prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the first respondent to regularise the service of the petitioner as permanent Sanitary worker.4. It is submitted by the petitioners that the petitioners have registered their names with the employment exchange, Coimbatore, and on being sponsored by the employment exchange, petitioners were called for interview for appointment to the post of sanitary worker as substitute worker on 18.12.1989.5. In all, ten vacancies w...
Jayaraman Alias Ek.Jayaraman. Vs. the State Rep. by Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Prayer:- Appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment imposed on the Appellant/Accused, dated 08.03.2005 made in S.C.No.111 of 2005 by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai.J U D G M E N T(Judgment of the Court was made by P.DEVADASS, J.,)1. The sole accused, who was convicted by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai, in S.C.No.111 of 2005 under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life, is the appellant before us. For convenience sake, in this Judgment, let us call him the accused.2. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, runs as under:- (i) P.W.1, Indira, is the wife of one Jayakannan. They have 3 children. Long back, the spouses have separated. She started living in her mother's house in Nattan Thottam in Mylapore, Chennai. Her children are living in her sister's house. P.W.1 developed intimacy with the accused, her neighbour. There were frequent quarrels between them. She was selling fl...
N.Rosammal. Vs. the Secretary and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the relief of issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records in G.O.Ms.No.10 dated 03.01.2002 passed by the 1st respondent in respect of the petitioner's property in S.Nos.287/1 and 287/4 situated at Bharathi Nagar Layout situated at Harichandrapuram village, Thiruthani Taluk, Thiruvallur District and quash the same as it is illegal, arbitrary, perverse against the laws of land.ORDER1. The petitioner in this writ petition is seeking to challenge the order of the State Government in G.O.Ms.No.10 Home (Courts.II A) Department, dated 3.1.2002. Admittedly, the said order came to be passed by the State Government by virtue of the power conferred on the State Government under the provisions of Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1997 (Act No.44 of 1997). It was found out that M/s.Southern Finance and Trading, Southern Textiles and Southern Jewellers, Amb...
E.Ravi. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the Government letter No.16097/FR-2/2010-1, dated 17.9.2010, on the file of the first respondent quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the State wide seniority list so as to enable the respondents to bring him under time scale of pay.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned.2. The main contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been in service, in the Forest Department, as a Plot Watcher, from 1.6.1983. Though he had been in service, continuously, from the initial date of his appointment, he had not been regularised in service, as per the Government orders, in G.O.Ms.No.64, Environment and Forest Department, dated 8.3.1999 and G.O.Ms.No.95, Environment and Forest Department, date...
Tmt.Savithiri Ammal. Vs. the Executive Engineer and ors
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to restore the electricity connection which was disconnected by them on 12.09.2011 to the domestic usage of the petitioner in Card No.346-005-485.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court, with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to restore domestic electricity connection disconnected on 12.09.2011, in Card No.346-005-485.2. The husband of the petitioner Thiru.M.Govindappa Naidu, holding the Consumer No.152, was charged with theft of energy in the year 1997. A criminal case vide Crime No.1503 of 1997, was registered against the late husband of petitioner. The learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Thiruthani, acquitted the husband of the petitioner of the charge of theft of electricity. The revision filed by the Respondents against the order of acquittal was also dismissed.3. The respondents...
B.GeethA. Vs. Dr.Ambedkar Law University
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
PrayerWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation on 14.5.2012 and permit the petitioner to write the second year examination to be held on 17.5.2012 and on subsequent dates and also not to put redo of the classes of fourth semester.PrayerWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to permit the petitioners to take up the examinations for 1st year B.L. 3 years scheduled to commence on 18.05.2012.PrayerWrit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents herein to permit the petitioner to take up the examinations for 1st year B.L. 5 years scheduled to commence on 18.5.2012.COMMON ORDER1. The petitioners in all these Writ Petitions are students of the Government Law College, Chengalpattu. In W.P.No. 13484 of ...
R.Subbian. Vs. the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Original Application filed under Section 9 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, praying to call for the records in pursuant to Para-6 of G.O.Ms.No.133, Highways (H.F.2) Department dated 1.8.2000 and the consequential rejection order passed by the second Respondent in Letter No.17211/HF2/2000-2 dated 7.2.2001 and quash these orders and consequently direct the second Respondent to refix the scale of pay of the petitioner in the post of Selection Grade Assistant as Rs.5750+273 personal pay in the time scale of pay of Rs.5000-150-8000, retrospective with effect from 16.9.2000 with arrears and interest and the seniority and other consequential service benefits, has been transferred to this Court on the abolition of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal and renumbered as writ petition.O R D E R1. The petitioner is working as Assistant in the Office of the Assistant Divisional Engineer, Highways and Rural Works, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.2. The petitioner was appointed as Juni...
M.Vajram. Vs. the Director General of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
PRAYER:This petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No. 2062of 2002 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the third respondent to appoint the petitioner for the post of Constable (Prison) in pursuant to the selection made in the year 2001 under the serial 031064/01.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the third respondent to appoint the petitioner to the post of Constable (Prison) in pursuant to the selection made in the year 2001 under the serial No. 031064/01.2. The petitioner after passing +2 also completed the course in B.A. Philosophy, but due to compartment in one subject, he was not awarded the degree.3. The petitioner applied for the post of constable in pursuance to the advertisement by the respondent and appeared in the various test conducted for selection to the post of constable.4. The submission o...
C.Balu. Vs. the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Panagal Buildin ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order in Ref.No.LL1/16968/2011 dated 4.10.2011 on the file of the first respondent quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the State wide seniority list so as to enable the respondents to bring him under time scale of pay.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned.2. The main contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been in service, in the Forest Department, as a Plot Watcher, from 1.1.1986. Though he had been in service, continuously, from the initial date of his appointment, he had not been regularised in service, as per the Government orders, in G.O.Ms.No.64, Environment and Forest Department, dated 8.3.1999 and G.O.Ms.No.95, Environment and Forest Department, dated...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »