Chennai Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Rajendran. Vs. the Director General of Police and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
Prayer:This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in and by his proceeding Na.Ka.J1/PR31/Erode/11, dated 24.09.2011 and quash the same.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. It has been stated that the petitioner was appointed, as a Grade II Police Constable, in the year, 1972. Thereafter, he was promoted, as an Inspector of Police, on 19.05.2010, and had been posted, at Bangalowputhur Police Station, Erode District. He was allowed to retire from service, on 30.09.2011, by an order of the second respondent, dated 27.09.2011, without prejudice to the departmental enquiry, which had been initiated against him, under Rule 3(b) of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955.3. It has been further stated that the petitioner had registered a ...
S. Kuppan. Vs. Mrs. Mohana
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
Civil Revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 18.10.2011 made in Contempt Petition SR. No: 39312 of 2011 in O.S. No: 4534 of 2010 passed by the XIIIth Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.O R D E R1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed calling in question an order passed on 18.10.2011 by the XIIIth Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in Contempt SR. No: 39321 of 2011 in O.S. No: 4534 of 2010 and for a consequential direction to entertain the contempt petition and pass orders after conducting enquiry in accordance with law.2. The petitioner is the defendant in the suit who filed an application under Section 94 ) read with Section 151 Cr.P.C. praying to punish the respondent / plaintiff for contempt of Court since she made false allegations and obtained interim injunction by playing fraud upon the Court.3. The brief facts leading to the filing of this Revision is as follows:-" ( i ) The respondent / plaintiff filed O....
Pattabi. Vs. Jayammal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
This civil revision petition is preferred under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure as against the order dated 05.10.2010 passed by the learned District Munsif, Gudiyattam, Vellore District in I.A.No.1026 of 2008 in I.A.No.45 of 2008 in O.S.No.733 of 1985.ORDER1. Heard both sides.2. Animadverting upon the order dated 05.10.2010 passed by the learned District Munsif, Gudiyattam, Vellore District in I.A.No.1026 of 2008 in I.A.No.45 of 2008 in O.S.No.733 of 1985, this civil revision petition has been focussed.3. A thumb nail sketch of the germane facts, in a few broad strokes, can be encapsulated thus:(i) O.S.No.733 of 1985 was filed by the respondents/plaintiffs seeking the following reliefs:- To pass a judgment and decree -- declaring the plaintiffs' absolute title to the schedule "A" property;- to grant permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his men and agents from in any way interfering with the plaintiffs' possession and enjoyment of the same;- in case the oral exc...
Ms.Lakshmi Agency. Vs. the District Supply and Consumer Officer and or ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
Prayer Writ Appeal in W.A.(MD) No.89 of 2009 is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the Order dated 27.1.2009 made in W.P.No.11561 of 2006 on the file of this Court. Writ Petition in W.P.(MD) No.8166 of 2007 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in his proceedings dated 20.2.2007 and in his proceeding No.A.107 Tvl dated 24.9.2007 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to issue Kerosene Wholesale Dealership Agreement in the name of the petitioner as a sole proprietor.Writ Petition in W.P.(MD) No.3295 of 2008 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of declaration to declare the impugned Clause 2.4.3 in the impugned Circular No.98- 12/2005 No.R.O./6002 dated 29.12.2005 issued by ...
S.Ramalingam. Vs. the Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to impugned the document registered as Doc.No.2605 of 2011 on the file of SRO Villivakkam which was registered in violation of the decree passed in O.S.No.154 of 2010.O R D E R1. The petitioner has approached this Court with prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to impugned the document registered as Doc.No.2605 of 2011 on the file of SRO Villivakkam, having been registered in violation of the decree passed in O.S.No.154 of 2010.2. The petitioner was married to Mrs.J.Kaplana on 11.04.1976. At the time of marriage, the petitioner was employed as Scientific Assistant in the Ministry of Defence and his wife was employed as Telephone Operator in Madras Telephones. The petitioner along with his wife decided to purchase a house and applied for allotment with the Tamil Nadu Housing Board under Korattur Scheme. ...
R.Manohar. Vs. the Assistant Engineer and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records on the file of the first respondent pertaining to the impugned letter bearing 36/11 dated 18.07.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to provide the new Electricity Service Connection to petitioner's residential portion at plot bearing No.145, Philips Road, Neelankarai, Chennai-41 in Town Survey No.68/1A.O R D E R1. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records on the file of the first respondent pertaining to the impugned letter bearing 36/11 dated 18.07.2011 and quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to provide the new Electricity Service Connection to petitioner's residential portion at plot bearing No.145, Philips Road, Neelankarai, Chennai-41 in Town Survey No.68/1A.2. Mr.P.Gunaraj, learned counsel appears on behal...
Suchitra Silks Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Sea-imports), ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both sides. The appellants imported viscose filament yarn in cake form for further processing. They declared the same as reject quality with a unit price of US$ 2.1 per Kg. The department got the impugned goods tested by SASMIRA, Mumbai and the test report held the impugned goods to be of Grade-I quality. The department also found that the Master Bill of Lading declared the goods to be of Grade-A quality whereas the House Bill of Lading showed the description as reject quality. In view of these discrepancies, the department proposed to discard the declared value of US$ 2.1 per kg. and proposed to enhance the value to US$ 2.5 per kg. on the basis of contemporaneous imports. 2. The adjudicating Commissioner has passed a detailed speaking order after hearing the appellants. He has finally approved a value of US$ 2.314 per kg. for one Bill of Entry and US$ 2.31 per kg in respect of three other Bills of Entry after analyzin...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- Next ›