Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 23 2026

R.Ezhilarasi vs the Authorised Officer

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANR.Ezhilarasi No.1/447, Bajanai Kovil Street, Periya Colony, Manapakkam, Chennai-600 125. Petitioner Vs First Floor, South West Boag Road, Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India forissuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the orderdated 20.07.2023, passed in C.M.P.No. 3938 of 2023, on the file of the Special Judge/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet and quash the same. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr. V.BalasubramaniORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) None for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, thepetition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, WMP Nos.10719 a...


Jun 23 2026

Albert John Vs The State represented by, Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR and Crl.M.P.Nos.5895 & 5897 of 20261. Albert John S/o.Ambrose, No.19, Malaiappan Street, Mandavelipakkam, Chennai - 28.2. Gracy John W/o.Albert John, No.19, Malaiappan Street, Mandavelipakkam, Chennai - 28. ..Petitioner(s) Vs.1. The State represented by, Inspector of Police, E-5, Foreshore Estate Police State (Crime), Chennai.2. Michael Stennet S/o.S.J.Sebastian, No.36/6, Perumal Koil 1st Street, Kottur, Chennai - 600 085. ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records in C.C.No.3460 of 2016 pending on the file of XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet Chennai and quash the same and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Ms.G.Uma Maheswari For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Criminal Side) For R1 Mr.V.Kadhirvelu for R2 Page1 of 8ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed...


Jun 23 2026

Anusuya Vs Kaliammal

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

CMP No.13847 of 2026 in SA Sr No.61392 of 2026S.SOUNTHAR, J.This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 41 days in filing the second appeal. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay in filing the second appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number thesecond appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.L.Mouli, counsel for the sole respondent, at the time of admission. 23.06.2026 MST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 23 2026

David Vs The State Rep. by

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

Crl.M.P. No.10297 of 2026 and Crl.A.SR.No.22035 of 2026Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andSUNDER MOHAN, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) accepts notice for the respondent and having regard to the reasons set out in the condonation petition, does not very seriously object to the delay.2. Hence, and having regard tothe reasons set out in the affidavit filed in support of the Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 725 days in filing the Criminal Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M, J.] [S.M, J.] 23.06.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 23 2026

M/S.Grace Mart Private Limited, vs the Regional Provident Fund Commiss ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and W.M.P.No.14374 of 2024 --- M/s.Grace Mart Private Limited, (previously Known As M/s.Grace Super Market) New No.280, Old No.265, Arcot Road, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026, Rep. by its Director. ..Petitioner Vs.1. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II (C & R), Regional Office, No.3, Rajaji Salai, Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.2. Enforcement Officer Div-523, Regional Office, No.3, Rajaji Salai, ..RespondentWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents, their subordinates, representatives, from initiating recovery proceedings or implementing / giving effect to the order dated 21.03.2024 passed by the first respondent under Ref. No. TB / TAM/ RO / ENF/ CC-II/ T-3/ 1804538 / Proceedings / 2024 in Dairy No.2792 of 2019 in the proceedings under Section 7-A of the EPF and MP Act, 1952, pending d...


Jun 23 2026

Easwaran and another Vs Mr. Kannan,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR1. Easwaran2. Loganathan..Petitioner(s) Vs Kannan, ..Contemnor(s) Prayer:- Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, pleased to punish the Respondent herein for disobeying the Order dated 25.09.2024 passed in W.P.No. 28102 of 2024 on the file of this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Contemnor(s): Ms.R.K.Varshini, Government AdvocateORDERWhen the Contempt Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent produced the order passed by the respondent in letter No.120/2026 dated 19.06.2026. 2.In the Writ Petition, the respondent was directed to conduct an enquiry and pass orders as per the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in the Sudha Ravi Kumaar Vs. The Special Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Chennai 34 case reported in 2017 SCC Online Mad 19191. Page1 of 4 Since, the direction issued by t...


Jun 23 2026

R.Raja Paul Vs The Management of

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER -- R.Raja Paul ..Petitioner Vs. The Management of M/s.Zamil Steel Engineering India Pvt Ltd., "Kochar Technology Park", Door No.SP-31A, I Cross Road, II Floor, Ambattur Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai-600 058. ..RespondentWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, calling for the records pertaining to the Award, dated 22nd day of February 2023 in O.P.No.118 of 2022 on the file of the Presiding Officer, II Addl. Labour Court, Chennai and quash the same and to direct the respondent to re-instate the petitioner herein into service, with continuity in service and other attendant benefits For Petitioner : M/s.R.Selvakumar S.SrideviFor Respondent : Mr.S.SathishORDERThe Writ Petition is filed questioning the interim order passed by the Labour Court, whereby the Labour Court found in favour with the Management Page1 of 7 regarding the termination of the...


Jun 23 2026

Rajan V.N, vs Canara Bank

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Rajan V.N, Proprietor, M/s.Rajan Enterprises, Old No.6, New No.5 Pertho Street, Royapettah, Chennai 600014. Petitioner Vs 2.M.Gunaseelan Advocate Commissioner, Egmore Bar Association, Egmore, Chennai 600008. 3.The Assistant General Manager Tambaram, Chennai. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 and 3 to accept the sum of Rs.21.00 lakhs being the balance amount payable by the petitioner in terms of the OTS sanction dated 28.06.2023 together with any overdue interest, if any, as full and final settlement of the loan accounts availed by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr. N.Ramakrishnan For Respondents : Mrs.T.Hemalatha for R1 and R3. R2 - No Appearance.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Ju...


Jun 23 2026

G.Alamelu vs the Authorised Officer

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN G.ALAMELU D.NO.347D, VELLUR, YERCCAUD, SALEM- 636 601. : PetitionerVersusSALEM, SALEM DISTRICT. : Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records toorder passed by the respondent in Proceeding Ref.ROSLM/SALE/38/2024- 25/ KSK dated 13.05.2024 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Sahithya, for Mr.M.Elango For Respondent : No appearanceORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition.2. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, WMP Nos.40572 and 16975 of 2024 are closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, ...


Jun 23 2026

S.Nirmal Vs Arun Kumar T

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-23-2026

C.M.P.No.14248 of 2026 in C.M.A.S.R.No.73649 of 2025A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 293 days in re-presenting the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. The reasons adduced in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition being satisfactory, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and consequently, the delay of 293 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to the condition that the claimant/petitioner will not be entitled to interest for the delay period i.e., for 293 days, in the appeal.23.06.2026 vca Note: Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission in due course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...



AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial