Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.M.Anantha Murugan, vs the Union of India,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN WP(MD)No.20109 of 2014 & M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 S.M.Anantha Murugan Petitioner(s) Vs.1. The Union of India, Rep. by its Cabinet Secretary,3. The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary,6. The State of Tamil Nadu,Repd. by its Chief Secretary, Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.E.Sebastin Raj For Respondents 1 to 5 : Mr.C.Nandagopal (C.G.S.P.C) For Respondent No.6 : Mr.C.Jeganathan, Counsel for StatePrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 5 not to take any steps to implement the DBTL system, the Bank Account based domestic LPG gas connection and supply of refilled gas cylinders to all domestic consumers in India and further direct the Respondents 1 to 5 to provide domestic refilled LPG cylinder to the public by following the earlier sys...
Ranjith Kumar Vs The Sub Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:24.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and Crl.M.P(MD) No.13968 of 2023 Ranjithkumar .. Petitioner Vs. 2.Aravinth .. Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the STC No.4013 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy and quash the same as against the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karunanidhi For R-1 : Mr.PVetrivel Government Advocate(Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in STC No.4013 of 2020 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate appearing for the first respondent submitted that in this case already trial commenced and the trial is in midway and therefore prayed to dismiss the petition.3. This Court perused the records and as per the records there are prima facie ...
Balathandayudhapani Vs The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:24.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and Crl.M.P(MD) No.14404 of 2023 Balathandayuthapani .. Petitioner Vs. 2.K.Muruganantham Special Sub Inspector of Police Thanjavur District .. Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.593 of 2023 dated 19.08.2023 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same as illegal as far as against this petitioner is concerned.For Petitioner : Mr.Joel Paul Antony For R-1 : Mr.PVetrivel Government Advocate(Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.593 of 2023 dated 19.08.2023 on the file of the first respondent police2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate appearing for the first respondent submitted that in this case investigation has been completed and final report has been filed before the...
P.Mookkammal Vs M.Sri Ramya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 24/06/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and CRL MP(MD) No.17866 of 2023 P.Mookkammal ... Petitioner Vs M.Sri Ramya ... Respondent PRAYER :- To pass an order to withdraw the case in STC.No.69 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court,Theni and transfer to the Judicial Magistrate No.I,Dindigul. For Petitioner : M/s.C.Mayilvahana Rajendran Advocate. For Respondent : No appearance When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petition is pending from 2023, now only the trial has been completed and the case is posted for arguments. Therefore, he prayed to transfer the case and also an order for dispensed with the appearance of the petitioner.2. Recording the same, since already the trial has beencompleted and the case is posted for arguments, at this stage it is not appropriate to transfer the case. As far as the request for dispensed with the persona...
Merin Jughy Vs Alwin Surya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and Merin Jughy : Petitioner Vs. Alwin Surya : Respondent PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the case in I.D.O.P.No.1184 of 2025 on the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore and and transfer the same to the Family Court, Nagercoil. For Petitioner : Mr.P.T.Ramesh Raja For Respondent : Mr.G.Aravindan.ORDERThe Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to withdraw the case in I.D.O.P.No.1184 of 2025 on the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore and and transfer the same to the Family Court, Nagercoil.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counselappearing for the petitioner would submit that the parties have entered into an agreement, wherein they have agreed to file a petition for divorce on mutual consent and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and...
The State of Tamil Nadu Vs Rajakumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
and AND (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 141 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. The learned counsel for the respondents have not raised any serious objection to the petition being allowed.3. Accepting the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered. Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order. [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] Page No.1/2 AND and Page No.2/2...
The Claims Manager, Vs 1. S. Prabhakaran (Died), 2. R. Rajeswari,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-24-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR IN THE CLAIMS MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, PLA. KANAGU TOWERS, 2ND FLOOR, THILLAI NAGAR 2ND LANE, TRICHY - 620 018. ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT Vs 1 S.PRABHAKARAN (DIED) 2 R. RAJESWARI ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 3 MANICKA SELVI 4 LUNA JEBASHRI 5 CHRISTOPHER RAJAN ...RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 (RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF DIED R1, VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 24.06.2019 MADE IN CMP(MD)NO. 2710 & SR.52586/2018 BY JNBJ.)Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the fair and decreetal order dated District at Srivilliputhur, pending disposal of the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. Prayer in CMA(MD). 1063/ 2022 : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed und...
The DGM (T) And Project Director Vs The District Collector And Sole Ar ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
C.M.P.No.14848 of 2026 in Arb Appeal No.SR214134 of 2025P.VELMURUGAN, J.andK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) Dispensed with for the present. [PVJ] [KGTJ] 23.06.2026 cgi Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S. Ramachandran vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and C.M.P.No.26702 of 2023 1.S.Ramachandran 2.S.Arumugam ...Appellants Vs. Kanchipuram District. ...Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to allow the above Writ Appeal by setting aside the order dated 24.08.2022 passed in W.P.No.25863 of 2014. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mrs.Akila Rajendran, Govt. Advocate *****JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) When the matter was called on 28.10.2025, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal today. Even today none appears for the appellants.2. Hence, this Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) dsa Index :Yes/No ...
The Tamilnadu Fireworks vs the Principal Secretary to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.Nos.12979 of 2011 & 44160 of 2025 W.P.No.12979 of 2011 The Tamilnadu Fireworks and Amorces Manufacturers Association Rep. by its President S.S.Vijayakumar TANFAMA Centre 442, Kamarajar Road Sivakasi-626 123. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Labour And Employment(M2) Department, Fort St.George Chennai-9.2. The Chief Inspector of Factories Chepauk, Chennai-5.3. The Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories Sivakasi & Virudhunagar Circle Sivakasi. Respondent(s) W.P.No.44160 of 2025 M/s Simma Fireworks Factory Rep. by its Managing Partner Vignesh Kumar Having Office at No.74-A, Velayutham Road Sivakasi-626 123. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Labour And Employment(M2) Department, Fort St.George Chennai - 600 009.2. The Chief Inspector of Factories Chepauk, Chennai -...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »