Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

David Vs The State Rep. by

David vs The State Rep. by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 23, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1440647

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/10297/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

David

Respondent

The State Rep. by

Excerpt

crl.m.p. no.10297 of 2026 and crl.a.sr.no.22035 of 2026dr. anita sumanth, j.andsunder mohan, j.(order of the court was made by dr. anita sumanth, j.) mr.m.m.i.khaleel, learned government advocate (criminal side) accepts notice for the respondent and having regard to the reasons set out in the condonation petition, does not very seriously object to the delay.2. hence, and having regard tothe reasons set out in the affidavit filed in support of the miscellaneous petition, the delay of 725 days in filing the criminal appeal is condoned and this miscellaneous petition is ordered.3. registry is directed to number the criminal appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [a.s.m, j.] [s.m, j.] 23.06.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

Crl.M.P. No.10297 of 2026 and Crl.A.SR.No.22035 of 2026

Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.

and

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) accepts notice for the respondent and having regard to the reasons set out in the condonation petition, does not very seriously object to the delay.

2. Hence, and having regard to

the reasons set out in the affidavit filed in support of the Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 725 days in filing the Criminal Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

3. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M, J.] [S.M, J.] 23.06.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial