Chennai Orders Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Sekar vs M/S.Axis Bank Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN S.Sekar Plot No. 8, Valansozhi, Vinayagar Nagar, P. Mappadugai Village, Mayiladuthurai 609 003 Petitioner Vs 2.R.Kavitha Plot No 8 Valansozhi, Vianyagar Nagar, P. Mappadugai Village, Mayiladduthurai 609 003 Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration declaring possession notice under Section 13 (4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 dated 23.08.2023 by the 1 st respondent bank as illegal and without following the provisions of the Act. For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Sivakumar for M/s. K.M.Vijayan Associates For Respondent(s): Mrs. M.R.Uma Vijayan for R1. R2 - No Appearance.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) When the writ petition was taken u...
M.Balaji Vs G.Sekar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
CMP No.12328 of 2026 in SA Sr No.77068 of 2026S.SOUNTHAR, J.This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 48 days in filing the second appeal. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay in filing the second appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number thesecond appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.V.S.Jagadeesan, counsel for the sole respondent, at the time of admission. 23.06.2026 MST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Kowsalya S Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Kowsalya.S W/o. Prabhu, No.33, Muthu Mariyamman Kovil Street, Kandiputhur, Pallipalayam, Kumarapalaiyam Taluk, Namakkal District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Office of District Magistrate and District Collector,5. The Inspector of Police ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 4 Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction, in the nature of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the entirerecords, relating to Petitioners Husband detained under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 17.04.2026 on the file of the second respondent herein made in proceedings Memo Cr.M.P.No.28/Black Marketer/2026 C1 Dated 17.04.2026, quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the ...
R.Arumugam Vs K.Rajesh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE R.Arumugam S/o.Late Mr.Ramayyah, No.7/17, Puliyur 2nd Main Road, Trustpuram, Kodambakkam, Chennai - 600 024. ..Petitioner(s) Vs K.Rajesh S/o.Mr.A.Krishnamoorthy, Kodiyallur, Thirumeyachur P.O., Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur - 609 405. ..Respondent(s)a) That the Petitioner may be granted permanent custody of the minor girl child Riya, born on 05.02.2018, currently aged about 3 1/2 year and that the For Petitioner(s): Ms.K.Subalakshmi Suresh for M/s Chennai Law Associates For Respondent(s): M/s.P.MuthamizhselvakumarORDERThis petition has been filed to grant permanent custody of the minor girl child Riya, born on 05.02.2018, currently aged about 3 1/2 year and that the 2.When this matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has made an endorsement to that effect. 3.Accordingly, this petition is dismissed...
Ravichandran Vs K.Subramanian
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Ravichandran S/o S.V. Raju D.No. 167/2, Priya Nagar, Theethi Palayam post, Kalampalayam, Coimbatore 641010. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. K.Subramanian S/o. Kengaiyan D. No. 51, Bharathi Road, Telungupalayam,2. K. Dhandapani S/o. S. Kandasamy D. No. 36, Bharathi Road, Telungupalayam,3. Revathi W/o. Dhanabal, D. No. 14, Katoor Road, Rasipuram, Salem. S. Bharathamani (Died) A.K. Arunachalam (Died)4. Jayamani W/o. R. Selvaraj R.S. Puram,5. Suseela W/o. S. Jeyaraman D. No. 177, Anna salai Road, Page1 of 6 Rasipuram, Salem.6. Rajammal W/o. Nagarajan Pudhusampalli, Mettur, Salem.7. No.II Joint Sub Registrar Raja Street, Coimbatore8. Devi Arunachalam W/o. A. K. Arunachalam9. A. KanirajS/o. A. K. Arunachalam Coimbatore 10.A. Rukmani D/o. A. K. Arunachalam 11.B. Chandrasekar 12.B. Gunasekar 13.B. Saravanakumar Page2 of 6 14.B. Senthilkumar 15.B. Anandhakumar 16.Vimala W/o. Late. B. Nagendran 17.Mino...
Evergreen Media Pvt Ltd Vs Mohammed Abubucker and 7 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU IN C.S(COMM DIV) NO. 46 OF 2026 Evergreen Media Pvt Ltd No.11/19 Frist Main Road, Vengeeswarar Nagar, Vadapalani, Chennai 600026 ..Applicant(s) Vs1. Mohammed Abubucker and 7 others S/o.Late. Abbas Rowther, No.11-A, Vedavalli Street, Saligramam, Chennai-600093.2. M/s.Paramount Media Traders Rep by its Proprietor, C-50/5, Ganesh Apartments, 2nd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai-6001023. M/s. Vector Digital Services Rep by its Partner, Willingdon Island, Ernakulam, Kerala-6820034. BRAVO Entertainment Rep. by its Manager, Abdul Kalam Nagar, Phase-2, Pattur, Mangadu, Chennai-6001225. M/s.Real Music Rep.by its Managing Director, New.No.3, Old.No.8, Page1 of 5 A.R.Cauveri Enclave,, F2, 1st Floor, 3rd Street, Vadapalani, Chennai-6000266. M/s.Lehren Networks pvt.Ltd, Rep.by its Manager, Shalimar Morya Park, 404, 4th Off New Link Road, Andheri West, Mumbai, Maharashtra-4000537. You TubeRep b...
Kannadhasan Vs The State Rep. by its The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN 1.Kannadhasan 2.Shanthi ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Crime No.Not Known of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, praying to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in Crime No.Not Known of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Magesh For Respondent(s): Mrs.R.S.Indira, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw this criminal original petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. Page1 of 2 C.KUMARAPPAN J.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing forthe petitioners, this criminal original petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 23.06.2026 cda To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page2 of 2...
R.Kodeeswaran Vs T.S.Chellakumaraswamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN R.Kodeeswaran Door No.3/109, Sambalakaadu, Karukkupalayam, Thingalur, Perundurai Taluk, Erode District 638 055. : PetitionerVersus1.T.S.Chellakumaraswamy Thiruvengadam Palayam Village, Perundurai Taluk Erode District. 2.The District Collector Collectorate, Erode District- 638 001 3.The District Revenue Officer Erode District, Erode , Pin-638 001. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Erode District, Erode District-638 001. 5.The Tahsildar Perundurai Taluk, Erode District, 6.The Sub Registrar Perundurai, Erode district,7.The Executive Officer Thiruvengadam Palayam village, Karumandiselli Palayam Panchayat, Perundurai Taluk, Erode District. 8.The Town Panchayat President 9.The Village Administrative Officer 10.T.S.Sivakumar alias Prakash No. 18/31, Tank street, Thiruvengadam Palayam, Karumandiselli Palayam, Perundura, Er...
Manikandan Vs The State rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN1.Manikandan 2.Nareshkumar ... Petitioners Vs. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.232 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioners anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.232 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioners were apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 115 and 351(3) of BNS Act and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.232 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.C.KUMARAPPAN, J.2. When the matter was listed for hearing on 05.06.2026, there was no representation for the peti...
M.Sasikumar, Vs Thiru. Gokulnath and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-23-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN M.Sasikumar, S/o. A.Muniswamiappa, No.4/66, Kottanagraharam Village, Thally Kothananur Post, Krishnagiri District-635 118. Al ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Contemnor(s) To punish the respondents under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No. 14113 of 2024 on 24.05.2024 Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): M/s. T.SUNDARAVADANAM For Contemnor(s): Mr.Abraham Prabhu, Government AdvocateOrderNone appears for the petitioner. 2.The learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents informs the court that the direction given by this Court has already been complied with. He stated that the total extent of property is 15 cents. As regards 10 cents, there is no dispute and it has been surveyed. Regarding remaining 5 cents, it appears that it belongs to someone else. Therefore, the petitioner has to approach the jurisdictional civil court. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »