Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Anusuya Vs Kaliammal

Anusuya vs Kaliammal

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 23, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1439564

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/13847/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anusuya

Respondent

Kaliammal

Excerpt

cmp no.13847 of 2026 in sa sr no.61392 of 2026s.sounthar, j.this petition has been filed to condone the delay of 41 days in filing the second appeal. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay in filing the second appeal is condoned. registry is directed to number thesecond appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. registry is also directed to print the name of mr.l.mouli, counsel for the sole respondent, at the time of admission. 23.06.2026 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

CMP No.13847 of 2026 in SA Sr No.61392 of 2026

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 41 days in filing the second appeal. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay in filing the second appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number the

second appeal, if it is otherwise in order

and list the same for admission. Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.L.Mouli, counsel for the sole respondent, at the time of admission. 23.06.2026 MST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Anusuya vs Kaliammal Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales