Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
KUNAL SINGH Vs The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Kunal Singh S/o.Subhod Singh, Ro-Bahar Madar Post, Am Kunmwari PS Parsa, Tahsin Parasa, Bihar. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Inspector of Police, PEW Tambaram Unit, Chennai District. Crime No.35 of 2025 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition is filed under section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the Petitioner on bail pending Trial in C.C.No.666 of 2025 on the file of II- Additional Special Court of NDPS, Chennai, respondent Police and thus render justice. Page1 of 7 For Petitioner(s): A. Tamil Selvan B.Sasi Kala For Respondent(s): Mr.A. Gopinath, Government AdvocateORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.03.2025, for the offence under Sections 8(c),20(b)(ii)(c) and 29(1) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.35 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that based on the information therespondent went to the plac...
Mohan Pradeep Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.No.1128 of 2026 Mohan Pradeep ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,2. Baskaran ..Respondent(s)Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records FIR in Cr.No.205/2024 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Satishchenduran For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.205 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent. Page1 of 2A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, there was no representation for the petitioner either in person or through counsel.3. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 30-01-2026 Index: Yes...
SEETHARAMU Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.36103 of 2025 Seetharamu S/o.Chakkarai ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 22 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest by the respondent in Crime No.22 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.For Petitioner : Mr.Mohanraj S For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ******ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 419, 420, 506(ii) r/w 120(b) of IPC, 1860, in Crime No.22 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against this petitioner is that, the petitionerherein colluded with other accused, impersonated...
M.D.Osim Ansari Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR M.D.Osim Ansari S/o.Rustam Ansari, Chanda Village, Thakur Gangti Post, Mirzachowki Godda District, Jharkhand State. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police Crime No. 88/2025. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition is filed under section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Spl.C.C.No. 131/2025 pending on the file of the Learned 4- Additional District Judge and Presiding Officer,Special Court under EC Act Salem and pass other orders.. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): M/s.S.Sudhanthiran Mohamed Abbas For Respondent(s): Mr.A. Gopinath, Govt AdvocateORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.03.2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.88 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that based on a secret information, theresp...
Eswaran Vs M. Udayakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
These petition is filed to condone the delay of 246 days in representing the above C.M.A. Sr. No.4992 of 2025.2. This court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, this petition is ordered.3. The Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same in the usual course. vsn vsn C.M.P.No.118 of 2026...
Rizwan Ultag vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKARRizwan Ultag ...... Petitioner/A3 Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.760 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.760 of 2024 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : M/s.T.Balaji For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.10.2024, for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c) read with Sections 20(b)(ii)(C), 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.760 of 2024, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police receivedinformation about the transportation of ganja, that the petitioner is likely to transport 22 kgs of ganja from Andhra Pradesh to Tami...
Vijayan @ Viji Vs THE STATE, By the Sub Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.35878 of 2025 Vijayan @ Viji S/o.Rajadurai ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State Rep. By, The Sub-Inspector of Police, (Crime No.437 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest by the respondent in Crime No. 437 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.For Petitioner : Mr. Dinesh R For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ******ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 109, 351(3), 103 of BNS @ 61(2), 49, 191(3), 103(1), 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.437 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against this petitioner is that, the petitioner whois ranked as A6 i...
The Managing Director Vs II Additional District Judge
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.No.1864 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.156417 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.1862 of 2026 in W.A.Sr.No.156416 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] In view of the reasons assigned in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are ordered and the delay of 158 days in filing the above appeals is condoned. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 30.01.2026 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Viswanathan vs T.Andiappan (Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
S.A(MD)No.376 of 2008N.MALA, J.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 30.01.2026, this Court, afterconclusion of arguments, observed that theSecond Appeal would be dismissed. However, upon perusal of the records and documents, this Court found that certain aspects of the case, particularly the validity of the acknowledgment in Ex.A.2, had not been addressed during the course of arguments. Hence, the matter was listed today for clarification.2. The learned counsel appearing forthe respondent submitted that the case papers had been returned to the client and, therefore, he was unable to advance his submissions. He requested that the matter be listed in the second week of March 2026 to enable him to place his arguments before this Court.3. Considering the request made, the earlier order of this Court stands recalled. The Registry is directed to list the matter on 16.03.2026 for fresh hearing. 179.02.2026 Indu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Krishnamoorthy Vs Saravanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Krishnamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Saravanan The Managing Director 2.Gopalakrishnan The General Manager 3.Bama The Administrator Chennai - 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors/respondents and punish them for willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.9691 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For R1 & R2 : Mr.Galdsun Micheal Rajadurai For R3 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing CounselORDERThe petitioner has approached this Court that the order of this Court in WP.(MD)No.9691 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025, has not been complied with. 2.Today, the learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. 3.Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. NCC : Yes/No ...