Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Pathirakali @ Padma Vs The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY M.Pathirakali @ Padma ... Petitioner Vs Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent police to take action on the petitioner's complaint dated 10.11.2025 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthhick For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents submitted that the prayer sought in the writ petition had already been considered.2. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No Costs. NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No jbr To4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, ...
M.Muthumari Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Maraneri
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30.01.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Muthumari ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Maraneri Police Station, (Crime No.284/2025) ... Respondent PRAYER :- Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to extend the time to comply the condition imposed in Crl.OP(MD).No.21902 of 2025 passed by this Court vide order dated 28.11.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Mareeskumar For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed to extend the time granted to the petitioner on 28.11.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.21902 of 2025 to surrender and execute the sureties. S.SRIMATHY,J vsg2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petitionis ordered and the time already granted is extend...
Krishnaprabu Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
in AND (Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 73 days in filing the above Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course.[G.K.I.,J] & [R.P.,J] aav AND aav in...
Varghesh Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Varghesh ... Petitioner Vs Arumanai, Kanyakumari District.7. The Panchayat President, Puliyur Salai Village Panchayat, Puliyur Salai, Kanyakumari District.8. The Block Health Officer /Health Inspector, Government Primary Health Centre, Edaicode, Edaicode Post, 9.Anish 10.Arulamma11. Yesudoss ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 8 to consider the petitioner's representations dated 13.04.2023, 12.09.2023, 14.09.2023, 15.09.2023 and 14.10.2023 and to take appropriate action to prevent the 9th respondent from Timber Industry in Survey Nos. 286/9 and 286/11 of Puliyur Salai Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan For Respondents : Mrs.K.Malathi, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1, R2, R4, R5, R7 & R8 Mrs.Madhuri Don...
S.Indhumathi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pew-Thu ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
in Heard learned counsel appearing for petitioner and learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent.2. Learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that this CriminalMiscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 163 days in filing the instant Criminal Revision Case in Crl.R.C.(MD).SR.No.4577 of 2026.3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for respondent submits that he has no objection in condoning the delay of 163 days.4. Being satisfied with reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 163 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order. rgm rgm in...
Chinna Gurusamy Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Chok ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30.01.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Chinna Gurusamy ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by the Inspector of Police, Crime No.244 of 2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.V.Muthuvelan For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-60. To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.24024 of 2025 dt. 26.12.2025.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.24024 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions regularly imposed by this Court and he prays for relaxation of the said condition. S.SRIMATHY,J vsg3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the conditi...
Mohamed Munira @ Muhammad Muneera Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep by Th ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/01/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI Mohamed Munira @ Muhammad Muneera ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- To direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.108/2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent to 4th respondent or any other competent investigation agency or to complete the investigation. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susikumar for M/s.Subash Law Office, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) The petitioner seeks for quash of the FIR in Crime No.108 of 2025 on the file of the respondents.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), on instructions,would submit that the investigation is completed and a final report has been filed as mistake of fact and RCS notice has also been served to the defacto complainant and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication.3. In view of the same...
Amudanandan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30.01.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY1.Amudanandan 2.Veerappan ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police Madurai District. (Crime No.7/2022) ... Respondent PRAYER :- Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to extend the time to comply the condition imposed in Crl.OP(MD).No.14134 of 2025 passed by this Court vide order dated 13.11.2025. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Althaf Sheriff for Ajmal Associates For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed to extend the time granted to the petitioner on 13.11.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.14134 of 2025 to surrender and execute the sureties. S.SRIMATHY,J vsg2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petitionis or...
Antony Johnson Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Eruva ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30.01.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Antony Johnson ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by the Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District. Crime No.285 of 2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K.Suyambulingabharathi For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-60. To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.23297 of 2025 dt. 26.12.2025.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.23297 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025. S.SRIMATHY,J vsg2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions regularly imposed by this Court and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner has ...
Balasuriyan Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of P ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/01/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Balasuriyan ... Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep., By the Superintendent of Police,, the Superintendent of Police Camp Office,2. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar District.3. Natrayasamy ... RespondentsPRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to conduct enquiry against the 3rd respondent based on the petitioners representation dt. 29.12.2025. For Petitioner : Mr. A.Banumathy Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.S. Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondents 1 and 2 to conduct an enquiry against the 3 rd respondent based on the petitioners representation dated 29.12.2025.2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submi...