Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Iruthaya Anthony Sirl Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
in ANDKRISHNAN RAMASAMY ,J.(Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 128 days in filing the above Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course.[G.K.I.,J] & [K.R.,J] aav ANDKRISHNAN RAMASAMY,J.aav in...
Sanjay Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Sub Inspector Of Police, Thillai N ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.23898 of 2025 Sanjay ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Sub-Inspector of Police, (Crime No.Not Known of 2025) ... Respondent/ComplainantFor Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.Not Known of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) Public Prosecutor submitted that as of now, there is no FIR and no complaint pending against the petitioner.2. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition stands closed. If any case is filed in the future, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court. (S S Y J) 02.01.2026 jbr To1. The Sub-Inspector of Police,...
M.Sujitha Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY M. Sujitha ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison O/o. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison and Correctional Services Madurai Range, Madurai Central Prison Campus, New Jail Road, Madurai.2.The Superintendent of Police Central Jail Madurai. 3.The Superintendent of Police O/o. The Superintendent of Police 4.The Inspector of Police Therkuvasal Police Station, Madurai District ....Respondents.PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, directing the respondents to call for the records passed by the first respondent in No.622/Vu.tha.2/2025 dated 11.11.2025 and quash the same as bad in law and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to grant 30 ordinary leave without escort to the petitioner's husband namely Muniyasamy @ Chendu ...
Ahamed Bazil Vs The Regional Passport Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.01.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Ahamed Bazil ... Petitioner Vs. Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to issue passport to the petitioner by considering the petitioner's passport application reference No.25-1003395937 dated 24.03.2025 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sathish Kumar For R1 : Mr.S.S.Sundarapandian Central Government Standing Counsel For R2 & R3 : Mrs.M.Aasha Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Hence, permission is granted and accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order...
Santhanam Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep by The Superintendent of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Santhanam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, 3.Meenalakshmi ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the 1st respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry based on the false complaint given by the 3rd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Periyasamy For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking to direct the 1st respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members under the guise of enquiry based on the false complaint given by the 3 rd respondent.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police submitted that after completing the enquiry, the matter was closed on 29.12.2025.3. Recording the submission of t...
Thamilarasan Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYThamilarasan ... Petitioner/Wife of the detenu Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by, The Superintendent of Police, 2.The Inspector of Police, Viralimalai Police Station, 3.Perumal ... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the detenu namely Ponmani, D/o.Pitchavel, aged about 21 years, who is illegally detained by the third respondent before this Court and set her at liberty.For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi (R1 & R2) Additional Public Prosecutor : Mr.S.Manoj Kumar (R3)ORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to secure and produce the de...
Stella Princes Santhakumari Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Sup ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI 1.Stella Princes Santhakumari 2.Johnson 3.Wilson Santhakumar ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, 4.R.Martin Selvakumar ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to harass the petitioners by way of interfering with the matter purely civil dispute. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Selvakumar For R1 R3 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to harass the petitioners by way of interfering with the matter purely civil dispute.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police submitted that after completing the enquiry, the matter was closed on 10.12.2025.3. Re...
Preshnev Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRIPreshnev ... Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by Superintendent of Police, (Crime No.791/2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the respondent no.2 to file the final report in crime No. 791 of 2020 on file of the respondent no.2 police station within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nihar Ali For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent no.2 to file the final report in crime No.791 of 2020 on file of the respondent no.2 police station within a time frame fixed by this Court.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for therespondents submitted that after completing the enquiry, the Final Report was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, ...
Nagarajan T Vs The State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)Nos.29310 and 29312 of 2025 T.Nagarajan ...Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary, Department of Agriculture Farmers Welfare, Theni District. ...RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned transfer order issued by the 3rd respondent vide impugned proceedings in Se.Mu.Aa.No. Aa2/8799/2025(1) dated 18.12.2025 in so far as transferring the petitioner and posting him as Assistant Agricultural Officer in the Office of the Assistant Director of Agriculture, Kaveripattinam, Krishnagiri District Quash the same, For Petitioner : Mr.T.Cibi Chakraborthy For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government PleaderORDERWhen this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that t...
Balaji Vs The Secretary to State Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)Nos.29310 and 29312 of 2025 Balaji ...Petitioner Vs Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. ...RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, by calling for the records relating to proceedings of the 4th respondent vide RC. No. A3/PTB/151/4273/2025 dated 23.12.2025, to quash the same and to consequently to direct the respondents to enforce promotion as per the Adhoc Rules vide G.O.Ms.No.53, Home (Police IX) Department dated 18.01.1999 and G.O.Ms.No.873 dated 02.12.2016 for the post of Inspector (Technical) and Sub-Inspector (Technical) in Police Telecommunication Branch.For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vishnu For Respondents : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government PleaderORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an...
- ‹ Prev
- 552
- 553
- 554
- 555
- 556
- 557
- 558
- 559
- 560
- 561
- Next ›