Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M.Krishnamoorthy Vs Saravanan

M.Krishnamoorthy vs Saravanan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1523968

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P(MD)/27/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Krishnamoorthy

Respondent

Saravanan

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 30.01.2026coram :the hon`ble mr.justice b.pugalendhi m.krishnamoorthy ... petitioner vs. 1.saravanan the managing director 2.gopalakrishnan the general manager 3.bama the administrator chennai - 600 002. ... respondents prayer : contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors/respondents and punish them for willful disobedience of the order of this court in w.p.(md) no.9691 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025. for petitioner : mr.a.rahul for r1 & r2 : mr.galdsun micheal rajadurai for r3 : mr.s.c.herold singh standing counselorderthe petitioner has approached this court that the order of this court in wp.(md)no.9691 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025, has not been complied with. 2.today, the learned counsel on either side inform the court that the order passed by this court has been complied with. 3.recording the same, this contempt petition is closed. ncc : yes/no index : yes/no internet:yes gns to 1.the managing director 2.the general manager 3.the administrator chennai - 600 002. b.pugalendhi,j gns

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2026

CORAM :

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Krishnamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Saravanan The Managing Director 2.Gopalakrishnan The General Manager 3.Bama The Administrator Chennai - 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors/respondents and punish them for willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.9691 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For R1 & R2 : Mr.Galdsun Micheal Rajadurai For R3 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court that the order of this Court in WP.(MD)No.9691 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025, has not been complied with. 2.Today, the learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. 3.Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes gns To 1.The Managing Director 2.The General Manager 3.The Administrator Chennai - 600 002. B.PUGALENDHI,J gns

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial