Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Tamilmaran vs the Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN A.Tamilmaran No.246, West Pondi Road Valavanur Post Villupuram Taluk & District. .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Chief Secretary to Govt.2. The Govt, of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Revenue Department3. The Commissioner of Land Administration 2nd Floor, Ezhilagam Chennai - 600 005.4. The District Collector Villupuram District Villupuram -605 602.5. The District Collector Kallakurichi District Kallakurichi- 606 202.6. The Revenue Divisional Officer Villupuram Division Villupuram - 605 602.7. The Revenue Divisional Officer Tindivanam Division Tindivanam - 604 002 Villupuram District.8. The Revenue Divisional Officer Kallakurichi Division Kallakurichi - 606 2029. The Revenue Divisional Officer Thirukovilur Division Thirukovilur - 605 776 Kallakurichi District. .. RespondentsPrayer : P...
Ramasamy Vs POORNIMA
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Ramasamy S/o.Kattaiya Gonar, Merku Kadu, Thenkumarai Post, Attur Taluk, ..Petitioner(s) Vs Poornima The Inspector of Police, ..Contemnor(s) PRAYER: This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent herein for his willful deliberate disobedience in complying with the order passed by this Court dated 09.02.2024 made in Crl.OP.No.2840 of 2024. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr. W.Camyles Gandhi For Contemnor(s): Mr. V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, Ms.R.Poornima, Inspector of Police, Thalaivasal Police Station, was present before this Court and an affidavit dated 30.01.2026 has been filed. The relevant paragraph is extracted hereunder:- 10. I respectfully submit that, upon completion of a detailed and elaborate investigation, a final report has been filed befo...
M.Mahesh vs the Additional Chief Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
W.P.No.566 of 2026M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2. Mrs.S.S.Meenakumary, learned counsel takes notice for R3 to R5.2. The learned counsel for therespondents 3 to 5 submitted that the petitioner is laying a pipeline through the public pathway not for agricultural purposes, but for the benefit of his sago industry. It is further submitted that such laying of the pipeline affects the rights of the private respondents and also causes disturbance to their agricultural activities. o disturbing the agricultural works. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not laying the pipeline through any private lands and that the same is being carried out only after obtaining appropriate permission from the Government authorities.4. Post on 07.04.2026 for filing counter of R3 to R5. 16.03.2026 rkp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Ishwarya Lakshmi vs Priya @ Sivaranjani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANIshwarya Lakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Priya @ Sivaranjani 2.The State of Tamilnadu rep by The Inspector of Police, in Crime No.9 of 2024. ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023, to condone the delay of 91 days against the order dated 19.06.2025 passed in CMP.No.1083 of 2024 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kurunjipadi in filing the present Criminal Revision Petition in Crl.R.C.SR.No.101345 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Jeyamohan For Respondent : Mr.K.Senthilkumar for R1 Mr.R.Vinothraja, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R2ORDERThe Revision challenges the order allowing the protest petition filed by the first respondent herein against the final report filed by the second respondent. The instant Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 91 days in filing the Revision. 2.The learne...
R.Akash Vs Arjun Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH R.Akash S/o.Ramesh, Door.No.234, Thanthai Periyar Salai, Adal Nagar, Valudareddi Post, Villupuram. District ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Contemnor(s) PRAYER: The Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt ofCourts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the orderpassed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No. 1764 of 2024 dated 01.02.2024. Page1 of 3 For Petitioner(s): Mr. M.Kaviveerappan, For Contemnor(s): Mr. V.J. Priyadarsan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, Mr.Arjun Kumar, Inspector of Police, Peelamedu Police Station, was present before this Court. The affidavit of the Inspector of Police has also been filed and the relevant portion is extracted hereunder:-9. I respectfully submit that, upon completion of a detailed and elaborate investigation, a final report has been filed before the learned Special Cou...
D.MURUGARAJ Vs The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA D.Murugaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Inspector of Police, (Cr.No.87 of 2023)2. N.Prakash ..Respondent(s)Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu, to complete the Trial in S.C.No.191 of 2023 as expeditiously as possible. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.G.Ramachandiran for Mr.T.Arul For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 Page1 of 3ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No v...
Meenakshi vs the Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Meenakshi S/o. Ponnusami, No.4/172, Mullai Street, Sulur, Kallapalayam, Coimbatore -641 018 ..Petitioner(s) Vs..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take action against the unlawful documents w.r.t. the Document No.2186/2006 dated Page1 of 4 19.05.2006 and Document No.(2331/2003) 3999/20025 dated 14.05.2025 of SRO-Joint II CBE., Registered before the 3rd Respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr,K.Jagan for M/s.T.Rekha Sivakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Jayachandran, Government AdvocateORDERLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed to withdraw the writ petition. He has made an endorsement for that purpose.2. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without any orderas to costs. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking order...
K. Veeramani Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 238 days in filing the above second appeal. 2.Mr.P.Gurunathan, learned Additional Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondent did not raise any objection in allowing this petition. This Court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, this petition is ordered.3. The Registry is directed to number C.M.A.Sr.No.210525 of 2025, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same in the usual course.4. It is made clear that the petitioner will not be entitled for any interest for the default period, if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. vsn vsn...
P.Bhaskar Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN P.Bhaskar : PetitionerversusVanagaram, Chennai : RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.1 namely the Commissioner, Grater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Buildings, (If necessary to do Physical measurement) to remove the Encroachment appurtenant to Arulmighu Sri Kailasanatha Temple, Vangaram, Chennai in accordance with law within a reasonable time frame based upon the petitioners representation dated 16.09.2025.For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jagannath For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader, HR & CE, for respondents 2 and 3 Ms.S.Vanitha Joice Rani, Standing Counsel, for the first respondentORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Allegation made in the petition that th...
PRETTY EVANGELIN Vs The Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Pretty Evangelin ..Petitioner Vs1. The Commissioner of Police, ..RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to direct the first respondent to provide adequate Police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner based on the representation dated 13.12.2025 and family members. For Petitioner : Mr.Krishnasamy Chinnasamy For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) Page1 of 4ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a better petition. He has also made an endorsement as regards withdrawal of the petition.2. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Neutral Citation: Yes/No MRN Page2 of 4 To1. The Com...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »