Chennai Orders Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Janarthanan, vs the Commissioner,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.07.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR K.Janarthanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003. 2.The Zonal Officer, Zone -I, Corporation of Chennai, No.266, T.H.Road, Tondiarpet, Chennai - 600 081. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the Impugned Order made in Ma.A.1.Na.Ka.No. A2/2134/2011 dated 16.06.2011 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner in a suitable post on compassionate ground in the place of Petitioner's deceased father A.Kathiresan within a time fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.P.T.RamadeviORDERThis matter came up for consideration before this Court on 18.07.202...
P.Nadesan, vs the Principal Secretary to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.07.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMARP.Nadesan ... Petitioner Vs. Secretariat, Chennai- 600 002. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent pertaining to the Letter No.5701/ H2/2012-4 dated 18.05.2012 containing the Charge Memo against the petitioner issued by the respondent and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary extraneous and not on administrative causes. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Aravind Subramaniam Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Narayanan For Respondent : Mr.K.H.Ravikumar Government AdvocateORDERThis writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent pertaining to the Letter No.5701/H2/2012-4 dated 18.05.2012 containing the Charge Memo against the petitioner issued by the respondent and quash the same as being ille...
Jayajamin vs the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.M.P.No.3613 of 2024 in Jayajamin .... Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Thiruvennainallur Police Station, Crime No.237 of 2020 .... RespondentPRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Criminal Procedure Code to suspend the sentence passed in Spl.S.C.No.91/2020 dated 02.06.2023 by the Learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for exclusive trial of Cases, Under POCSO Act, Villupuram (FAC) for the offences under Section 5(m) of the POCSO Act 2012 and convicted under Section 6 of the POCSO Act 2012 and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for Twenty years and grant bail to the petitioner pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.T.SaravananFor Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the Lear...
Rajasekar vs State by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in Rajasekar ...Petitioner Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 1/2019) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430(1) BNSS, 2023 to suspend the execution of the sentence passed in Spl. S.C. No.36/2023, dated 05.12.2024 on the file of the Special Judge for POCSO Act, at Dharmapuri and release the petitioner/appellant on bail pending disposal of Crl. A. SR. No.7309 of 2025.For Petitioner : Mr.Ramprakash Rajagopal For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar, Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge for POCSO Act, at Dharmapuri in Spl.S.C.No.36 of 2023 dated 05.12.2024, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal.2. The petitioner herein is the accused in Spl.S.C.No.36 of 2023on the fi...
Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN CMP No.9717 of 2025 in Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation Chennai-34 Appellant(s) Vs Watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd., C/o. CRBS and Associates LLP, Chartered Accountants, No.37, 2nd St, Alagiri Nagar, Vadapalani, Chennai 26. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.R Karthik For Respondent(s): Mr.R.SivaramanORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the applicant.2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, we are inclined to allow the prayer and grant exemption from filing the certified copy of the common order.3. Application is, accordingly, allowed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (R.SUBRAMANIAN,J) 24.07.2025 kpl...
E.Veerappan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN WP No. 8464 of 2025 E.Veerappan S/o. Elumalai, No.4, Erikarai Street, Edaiyalam, Thozhupedu, Chengalpet District Pin - 603 310 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector Chengalpet District,2. The Tahsildar, Maduranthagam Taluk, Madurantagam - 603 306.3. Ellammal W/o.Manoharan4. Mariappan S/o.Dhanapan R3 and R4 residing at Edaiyalam, Thozhupedu, Chengalpet District5. Murali S/o.Chinnaraj, Pandaram Street, Edaiyalam, Thozhupedu, Chengalpet District6. The Executive Engineer, Lower Palar Basin Division, Kancheepuram.7. The Assistant Engineer, Irrigation Section, Acharapakkam, Chengalpet.8. Kathammal, W/o.Thanappan9. Mallika,D/o.Elumalai 10.Elumalai, S/o.Perumal 11.Ganesan, S/o.Srinivasan 12.Chellakannu, S/o.Kishtappan R8 to R12 residing at Edaiyalam Village, Maduranthagam Taluk (R6 to R12 impleaded as per direction in order...
Kaliammal (Deceased) 1. Kandasamy Vs Boopathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
CMP NOs.16551, 16553 &16554 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR CMP NOs.16551, 16553 &16554 of 2025 in CRP. No.1585 of 2013 Kaliammal [die] Kandasamy, Door No.6/98A, 6/97a, Chinnakalipatti, Mangalam Village and Town, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. Appellant(s) Vs Ramasamy Gounder [died] Athiappan [died] Papayeammal [died] Palaniammal [died]1. Boopathi, S/o/Late Athiappan & 12 others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.N.Umapathi For Respondent(s): Mr.B.GopalakrishnanCOMMON ORDERThese petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 731 days in filing a petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the seventh respondent, to set aside the abatement and bring on record the proposed respondents 11 to 13 as legal representatives of the deceased seventh respondent as respondents 14 to 16 in the Civil Revision Petition.2. Considering the nature of dispute between the parties and ...
Kaliammal (Died) Kandasamy vs Boopathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
CMP NOs.16286, 16288 & 16467 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR CMP NOs.16286, 16288 & 16467 of 2025 in CRP. No.1585 of 2013 Kaliammal [die] Kandasamy, Door No.6/98A, 6/97a, Chinnakalipatti, Mangalam Village and Town, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. Appellant(s) Vs Ramasamy Gounder [died] Athiappan [died] Papayeammal [died] Palaniammal [died]1. Boopathi, S/o/Late Athiappan & 12 others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.N.Umapathi For Respondent(s): Mr.B.GopalakrishnanCOMMON ORDERThese petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 2059 days in filing a petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent, to set aside the abatement and bring on record the proposed respondents 8 to 10 as legal representatives of the deceased first respondent as respondents 11 to 13 in the Civil Revision Petition.2. Considering the nature of dispute between the parties and as...
I.Shafiullah vs S.Zahibunnissa
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
Crl.O.P.No.7900 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No.56046 of 2024 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J Leave granted. 24.07.2025 lok Note : Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
I.Shafiullah vs S.Zahibunnisa
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-24-2025
Crl.O.P.No.7880 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No.56045 of 2024 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J Leave granted. 24.07.2025 lok Note : Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...