Chennai Orders Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Boopathy vs K.Vinayagam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR and C.M.P.No.2642 of 2025 1.V.Boopathy 2.B.Mahalakshmi ... Petitioners Vs. K.Vinayagam ... Respondent Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order of proclamation of sale dated 04.01.2025 made in E.P.No.26 of 2019 in O.S.No.122 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Court, Vellore. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.N.C.Ashok KumarORDERLearned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the endorsement and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. mkn Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No To 1.The Principal ...
A.M.Narayanababu vs V.Sagadevan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
Crl.M.P.No.13268 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No.59513 of 2023G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 336 days in filing the above criminal appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 336 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 25.07.2025 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is, otherwise in order. bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Perumal vs Prema
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY AND CRL RC NO. 241 OF 2015 Perumal Petitioner(s) Vs Prema Respondent(s) For Petitioner: Mr.K.MadhanORDERThis petition has been filed to restore Crl.R.C.No. 241 of 2015 which was dismissed for non-prosecution by this Court on 16.08.2021.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the condition imposed by this Court has since been complied with.3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.4. On being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and considering that the condition imposed by this Court has been complied with, this petition is ordered.4. Registry is directed to restore the Crl.R.C.No.241 of 2015.5. Post the Crl.R.C.No. 241 of 2015 on 01.08.2025. nsl D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. nsl CRL MP No. 14504 of AND CRL RC NO. 241 OF 2015...
K.Palanisamy Vs Supriya Sahu, IAS and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.07.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR K.Palanisamy ... Petitioner ..Vs.. Ramapuram (Po)-635 115, Krishnagiri. ... Respondents PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act praying to punish the respondent for willfully disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No.11148 of 2012 dated 18.12.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajendran For Respondents : Mr.E.Sundaram, Government AdvocateORDERThis contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of theorder in W.P. No.11148 of 2012 dated 18.12.2023.2. On earlier occasion on 27.06.2025, Mr.E.Sundaram, learnedGovernment Advocate placed before this Court a copy of the order vide G.O.(D).No.668, Health and Family Welfare (D1) Department, dated 26.06.2025, purportedly in compliance with the orders passed by this Court.3. Today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on verification the same reported that the responde...
K.Jeyachandran, Vs The Official Liquidator,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 04.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY K.Jeyachandran, S/o.Karuppaiya, No.251,Nadu street, T.Nallur, Kulathur Taluk, Mathur-622515, Pudukottai District. ... Applicant -vs-1. The Official Liquidator, High Court Madras. As Liquidator of M/s.Maxworth Orchards (India) Limited. (In Liquidation), Corporate Bhavan, Chennai-600001.2. Mrs.D.Nagasaila.Administrator, M/s. Maxworth Orchards (India) Ltd. (in provisional liquidation) Old No.38/1, New No.14/1, Akbarabad 2nd street, Kodambakkam,Chennai-600024. ... Respondents Prayer : Company Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules Read With Rules 9, 11(b) & 19 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, to accept the offer of Rs.6,55,00,000/-(Six crores fifty five lakhs)as entire sale consideration and declare the applicant as SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J kj successful purchaser of the Maxworth-Trichy Project, admeasuring 78.80 Acres situated at Chet...
P.M.Selvaraj vs the Divisional Engineer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN & W.M.P.Nos.23881 & 23882 of 2025 P.M.Selvaraj .. Petitioner Vs.4. A.Balasubramanian .. RespondentsPrayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorari calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.18/2021/E.Va.A dated 21.02.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.A.Edwin Prabakar State Government Pleader Assisted by Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman for Respondents 1 to 3ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition.2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no orderas to costs. Consequently, the interim applications are also dismissed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUN...
M/s.CRK Enterprises Vs The REcovery officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP.No.8536 of 2023 M/s. CRK Enterprises Represented by its Prop. R. Aruldass No.26, Chinnaamman Koil Street, Kalavakkam, Thiruporur - 603 110 ... Petitioner Vs. The Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Tambaram Regional Office, NO.3, Rajajai Salali, Chennai -45 ...Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in TB/TAM/RECY/Div 525/ CP1/1407162/2021-22 dated 31.05.2022 on the file of the respondent herein and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.B.Manoharan For Respondent : M/s.Dwarakesh PrabhakaranORDERChallenging the demand notice dated 31.05.2022, the petitioner is before this Court.2. It is the case of the petitioner that they started their business in theyear 2015 with the intention of providing manpower to various establishments through job contrac...
The Project Director Vs DHAVAMANI
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
C.M.P.No.17373 of 2025 in Arb.Appeal SR.No.68265 of 2023K.KUMARESH BABU,J.This application has been filed to condone the delay of 159 days in paying the deficit Court fee of Rs.16230 in the above captioned Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application and being satisfied with the same, the Miscellaneous Petition is ordered as prayed for and the delay is condoned. Gba 25.07.2025 Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and further directed to tag the numbered Appeal along with C.M.A.Nos. 3034 & 3044 of 2023 and CMA.SR.Nos.68264, 68266 & 62269 of 2023 and list the same in due course. Page No. 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Muthusamy Gounder (Died) 1. M. Nagammal vs Saraswathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
CMP NO. 10195 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in Muthusamy Gounder (died) 1. M. Nagammal W/o. Late Muthusamy Gounder, Res. at No.9/4, 2nd Street, T.N.K. Puram, Thirumalai Nagar, Kongu Nagar Main Road, Tiruppur Town, Tiruppur Taluk and District. and 4 Others Appellant(s) Vs SARASWATHI W/o. Late Palanisamy, Res. at VOC Colony, Valainkadu, Tiruppur Municipal Corporation Town) and 3 Others Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.H. ManojinCOMMON ORDERThe present Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 10 days in filing the petition for restoration for restoring the S.A.No.881 of 2018 and to set aside the order of Dismissal passed by this Hon'ble Court on 23.01.2025 by restoring the appeal in S.A.No.881 of 2018 respectively.2. Heard Mr.H.Manojin, learned counsel for the petitioners.3. Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support ofthese miscellaneous petitions a...
VIJAYAKUMAR KRISHNAN Vs State rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN1. Vijayakumar Krishnan S/o.Krishnan Kuppusamy, No.6/25, Pillaiyar Kovil Street,2. Ponmudi Manivasagam S/o.Manivasagam Vadivel, No.41/38, Pillaiyar Kovil Street,3. Niyaz Ahamed Abdulbashir S/o.Abdul Bashir, 287, Muslim Street, Koliyanur, Villupuram-605 103 Petitioners Vs1. State rep by The Inspector of Police 2.Vaitheeswari D/o.Parasuraman, No.135, Thoppu Street, Thalavanur, Villupuram District RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 BNSS to dispense with the production of certified Copy of the FIR in Cr.No.421 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police For Petitioners : Mr.M.Ashwin Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1ORDERDispensed with for the present. Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is,...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »