K.Janarthanan, vs the Commissioner,

K.Janarthanan, vs The Commissioner,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 24, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1729994

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1729994
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Decided On: Jul 24, 2025
Case Number: WP/15982/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.Janarthanan,

Respondent

The Commissioner,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 24.07.2025coram:the honourable mr.justice mummineni sudheer kumar k.janarthanan ... petitioner vs. 1.the commissioner, corporation of chennai, ribbon buildings, chennai - 600 003. 2.the zonal officer, zone -i, corporation of chennai, no.266, t.h.road, tondiarpet, chennai - 600 081. ... respondents prayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order made in ma.a.1.na.ka.no. a2/2134/2011 dated 16.06.2011 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner in a suitable post on compassionate ground in the place of petitioner's deceased father a.kathiresan within a time fixed by this hon'ble court. for petitioner : no appearance for respondents : ms.p.t.ramadeviorderthis matter came up for consideration before this court on 18.07.2025, however, the same was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the same was directed to be listed on 21.07.2025 finally. on 21.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and the same was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal". today inspite of the matter is being listed under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation for the petitioner.2. in the light of the above, this court left with no other optionexcept to dismiss the writ petition for non prosecution. accordingly, the same is dismissed for non prosecution. no costs. 24.07.2025 index: yes/no internet: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking ordermtl to 1.the commissioner, corporation of chennai, ribbon buildings, chennai - 600 003. 2.the zonal officer, zone -i, corporation of chennai, no.266, t.h.road, tondiarpet, chennai - 600 081.mummineni sudheer kumar, j.mtl 24.07.2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.07.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR K.Janarthanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003. 2.The Zonal Officer, Zone -I, Corporation of Chennai, No.266, T.H.Road, Tondiarpet, Chennai - 600 081. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the Impugned Order made in Ma.A.1.Na.Ka.No. A2/2134/2011 dated 16.06.2011 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner in a suitable post on compassionate ground in the place of Petitioner's deceased father A.Kathiresan within a time fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.P.T.Ramadevi

ORDER

This matter came up for consideration before this Court on 18.07.2025, however, the same was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the same was directed to be listed on 21.07.2025 finally. On 21.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and the same was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal". Today inspite of the matter is being listed under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation for the petitioner.

2. In the light of the above, this Court left with no other option

except to dismiss the writ petition for non prosecution. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 24.07.2025 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-Speaking order

mtl To 1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ribbon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003. 2.The Zonal Officer, Zone -I, Corporation of Chennai, No.266, T.H.Road, Tondiarpet, Chennai - 600 081.

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

mtl 24.07.2025

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties K.Janarthanan, vs The Commissioner, Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar