Chennai Orders Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunitha Jain vs Sanajay Kumar Jain
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI Tr.CMP.No.12 of 2025 and Sunitha Jain ... Petitioner Vs. Sanajay Kumar Jain ... Respondent PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer the HMOP.No.67 of 2024 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai to Sub Court, Ulundurpet. For Petitioner : M/s.R.Poornima For Respondent : No AppearanceORDERDespite service of notice, the respondent husband has not chosen to appear in person or through his counsel and name of the respondent is also printed in the cause list, listing out the cases to be heard today.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and I have also gone through the affidavit filed in support of the request for transfer.3. The petitioner is facing proceedings initiated by the respondenthusband in HMOP.No.67 of 2024, Principal Subordinate Court, Mayildathurai. The petitioner expresses h...
R.Srinivasan vs K.Jagir Hussain
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN in Crl.A.Sr.No.25630 of 20231. R.Srinivasan S/o.R.Ramachandran, No.6/11, 4th Cross Street, Maravaneri, Salem-7. Petitioner(s) Vs1. K.Jagir Hussain S/o.Khadar Hussian, 54/93, Thubala Ahamed Street, Fort, Salem-1. Respondent(s)PRAYER:This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay in filing this appeal, pass further orders and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/s.M.SundareswaranORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 428 days in filing the above criminal appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in supportof this petition, the delay of 428 days is condoned and the petition is ordered subject to a condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the respondent on or...
THE GENERAL MANAGER Vs The Presiding Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH Review Application No.187 of 2025 The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Rangapuram, Vellore 09 ...Petitioner Vs1. The Presiding Officer,2. K.Murthy ...RespondentsPrayer: Review Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of CPC to review the order dated 21.02.2023 passed in W.P.No.15190 of 2016. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Aswin For Respondents : Mr.S.T.Varadarajan for R2ORDERClaiming that the Revision Petitioner / Management herein had not paid the 17(b) wages, the 2nd respondent/Workman had filed the Writ Petition No.15190 of 2016.2. Pending the Writ Petition, the Execution Petition No.11 of 2016in I.D.No.241 of 2009 on the file of Principal Labour Court, Vellore was filed by the respondent/workman and on 11.04.2022, the Execution Court had recorded the full payment of the last drawn wages under Section 17(b) of the Industrial Disputes A...
Devikarumari Amman vs Prasannakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and Devikarumari Amman W/o. Venkatesan, D/o. Venkatachalam @ Venkatachalapathi, Res. at Ozhinthiyam Pattu Village, Vanur Taluk, Villupuram District at present Door No.59, Kamarajar Salai, A-line, ... Petitioner Vs. 1.PRASANNAKUMAR S/o. Venkatachalam @ Venkatachalapathy, Res.at Ozhinthiyam Pattu Village, Vanur Taluk, Villupuram District at Present Door No.59, Kamarajar Salai, A-Line, Venkatachalam @ Venkatachalapathy deceased. 2.Venkatraman ... Respondents (Cause title accepted vide Court order dated 10.02.2025 made in CMP.No.2838 of 2025 in Tr.CMP.SR.No.2550 of 2025 by PTAJ)PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the proceedings in I.A.No.91 of 2022 in O.S.No.289 of 2021 pending on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tindivanam and the same to be transferred before the Principal District Court at Puducherry and to be tri...
A.Balasubramaniam, vs M/S.Praxair India Private Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA IN WP NO. 17465 OF 2024 A.Balasubramaniam, S/o. Agoram, No. 84, Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, Sriperumbudur, Town Cum Taluka, Kancheepuram. Petitioner(s) Vs M/s.Praxair India Private Limited Represented By Authorised Signatory Ms. Sony Bhatt, Sipcot Industrial Park, Plot No. F-18, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): S.Sivakumar S.Yesudossan For Respondent(s):ORDERThe respondent-Management had filed the present writ petition challenging the award passed in I.D.No.711 of 2018 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kancheepuram.2. Pending disposal of the above writ petition, the workman has filed the presentmiscellaneous petition claiming wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Dispute Act. The petitioner had joined the respondent-Management on 17.06.2013 and had been terminated from services on 09.12.2017. His last drawn wages as stated in the affidavit file...
Singapore International vs All India Council for
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Singapore International Business Pvt. Ltd., 22, Pattulos Road, Chennai-2, Represented By Its Director Subramaniam. Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent herein made in File No.37-3/Legal/AICTE dated 30.06.2008. For Petitioner(s): Ms.M.Akshaya for Mr.Srinath Sridevan For Respondent(s): Mr.Murali KumaranORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This writ petition is de-tagged and dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J) Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No ars To THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDSUNDER MOHAN,J.ars...
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WP No. 16319 of 2015 Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Dr.Ambedkar Employees' Union, 75/A, Thiruvallur Nagar, 8th Cross, Kattukudalur Road, Vridhachalam-606 001, Cuddalore District, Rep. by Regional Advisor V.Ganapathy Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records and quash the seniority list as on 30.11.2013, released over internetby the 4th respondent in respect of Field Assistants in Cuddalore Circle of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Corporation as being arbitrary, malicious, illegal, null and void and as being violative of B.P.MS(Ch) No.66 dated 01.02.1985 and consequently, direct the respondents to prepare a seniority list in consonance with B.P.MS(Ch) No.66 dated 01.02.1985 and effect consequential changes a...
Priyadarshini vs S.Karthikeyan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and Priyadarshini ... Petitioner Vs. S.Karthikeyan ... Respondent PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer HMOP.No.4597 of 2024 on the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai to Family Court, For Petitioner : M/s.R.Poornima For Respondent : No AppearanceORDERHeard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Despite service of notice on the respondent, the respondent has not chosen to enter appearance either person or through counsel.3. The petitioner is the wife facing HMOP.No.4597 of 2024 beforethe III Additional Family Court, Chennai. The petitioner is a resident of Thanjavur and is blessed with a child aged 1 years. Therefore, the petitioner expresses genuine difficulties in traveling all the way to Chennai to attend the proceedings in HMOP.No.4597 of 2024 before the III Additional Family Court, Che...
Charminar Rollers vs the Additional Commissioner of Customs(Siib)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and M/s.Charminar Rollers, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory S. Madhukumar ... Petitioner in -Vs- Chennai 600 001. ... Respondents in Prayer in W.P. No.4468 of 2025: Writ Petition filed Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned communication, dated 01.08.2024 in File No.GEN/Inv/DR/123/2024-SIIB O/o. issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same.Prayer in W.P. No.4471 of 2025: Writ Petition filed Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned communication, dated 26.11.2024 in File No.GEN/INV/DR/123/2024-SIIB issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and further, directing the 1st respondent and 2nd respondent to issue any letter for waiver of detention and demurrage charges with respect to the Bills of Entry Nos.3404892...
The Management vs the General Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-25-2025
The Management, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan Illam, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002. ... Petitioner vs. The General Secretary, Arasanga Pokkuvarathu Oozhiyar Sangam, No.73/MDS, Inaippu CITU, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Kalaiaranga Valagam, Chennai - 600 002. ... Respondent For petitioner : Mr.R.Balaji For respondent : Mr.S.T.VaradharajuluORDERThe matter is listed today under the caption 'for being mentioned'. 2.Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the name of the workman was wrongly mentioned as 'Rajasekar' instead of 'Raja Sheriff' in the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by this Court. Therefore, the typographical error has to be corrected in the said order. vga 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner has also acceded to the said factum.4.This Court has also perused the order, wherein the name of the workman was mentioned as 'Rajasekar', but, in the award itself, the name of the workman was mentioned as 'Raja Sheriff'. The...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »