Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Rajasekar vs State by

Rajasekar vs State by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jul 24, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1765337

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/5782/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajasekar

Respondent

State by

Excerpt

.....no.7309 of 2025.for petitioner : mr.ramprakash rajagopal for respondent : mr.s.raja kumar, additional public prosecutororderthis criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned special judge for pocso act, at dharmapuri in spl.s.c.no.36 of 2023 dated 05.12.2024, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal.2. the petitioner herein is the accused in spl.s.c.no.36 of 2023on the file of the learned special judge for pocso act, dharmapuri. he was found guilty for the offences punishable under section 3 r/w 4 of pocso (amendment act), 2019 and has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. aggrieved by the same, the present appeal has been filed.3. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned additional public prosecutor for the respondent.4. this court finds no reasons to suspend the sentence since thetrial court has gone through the evidence in its entirety and also finds that the petitioner has committed very serious and heinous offence as against the minor victim girl who is aged about 16 years at the time of occurrence.5. in the result, the petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed. index : yes/no neutral citation : yes/nospeaking/non-speaking ordernhsg.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.nhs to1. the special judge for pocso act, dharmapuri2. the inspector of police, 3.the public prosecutor, high court of madras, chennai-600 104.4. the superintendent, central prison, salem. in

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in Rajasekar ...Petitioner Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 1/2019) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430(1) BNSS, 2023 to suspend the execution of the sentence passed in Spl. S.C. No.36/2023, dated 05.12.2024 on the file of the Special Judge for POCSO Act, at Dharmapuri and release the petitioner/appellant on bail pending disposal of Crl. A. SR. No.7309 of 2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.Ramprakash Rajagopal For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge for POCSO Act, at Dharmapuri in Spl.S.C.No.36 of 2023 dated 05.12.2024, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal.

2. The petitioner herein is the accused in Spl.S.C.No.36 of 2023

on the file of the learned Special Judge for POCSO Act, Dharmapuri. He was found guilty for the offences punishable under Section 3 r/w 4 of POCSO (Amendment Act), 2019 and has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal has been filed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

4. This Court finds no reasons to suspend the sentence since the

Trial Court has gone through the evidence in its entirety and also finds that the petitioner has committed very serious and heinous offence as against the minor victim girl who is aged about 16 years at the time of occurrence.

5. In the result, the petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed. Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No

Speaking/non-speaking order

Nhs

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Nhs To

1. The Special Judge for POCSO Act, Dharmapuri

2. The Inspector of Police, 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai-600 104.

4. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem. in

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Rajasekar vs State by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales