Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Divisional Manager Vs Madhammal

The Divisional Manager vs Madhammal

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 07, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1704333

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/228/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Divisional Manager

Respondent

Madhammal

Excerpt

cmp.no.228 of 2025 cmp.no.228 of 2025 in cros.obj.sr.no.177264 of 2024m.dhandapani, j.this petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1172 days in filing the above cross objection.2. mr.s.p.yuaraj, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 7.3. learned counsel for the petitioner/ appellant submitted that the 8th respondent was already set as ex-parte before the trial court.4. in view of the above, notice to the 8th respondent is dispensed with.5. heard learned counsel on either side.6. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this court is inclined to order this petition.7. accordingly this petition is allowed. registry is directed to number the cross objection, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission along with cma.no.2569 of 2021 on 21.01.2025. 07.01.2025 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

CMP.No.228 of 2025 CMP.No.228 of 2025 in Cros.Obj.SR.No.177264 of 2024

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1172 days in filing the above Cross Objection.

2. Mr.S.P.Yuaraj, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 7.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/ appellant submitted that the 8th respondent was already set as ex-parte before the trial court.

4. In view of the above, notice to the 8th respondent is dispensed with.

5. Heard learned counsel on either side.

6. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court is inclined to order this petition.

7. Accordingly this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the Cross Objection, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter for admission along with CMA.No.2569 of 2021 on 21.01.2025. 07.01.2025 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties The Divisional Manager vs Madhammal Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales