Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suganya Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that this petitioner has given a complaint against Police Officials, in which, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed and there is no harassment to the petitioner as alleged by her. Recording the said submission, this petition is closed....
M/s. Goodway Plastics, Rep. by its Proprietor K.N. Mony Vs. The Managi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings No. TIIC/NGL/LAO/20-12-2013 dated 26.04.2012 and quash the same on the ground that the same is arbitrary and illegal and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings No. TIIC/NGL/LAO/20-12-2013 dated 26.04.2012 and quash the same on the ground that the same is arbitrary and illegal. 2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court that the TIIC already moved before the DRT against the collateral security in SAR.No.223 of 2...
Eswaran Vs. The Inspector of Police (Crime), Madurai City
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one Ramanik Lal S/o.Rajendran.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one Ramanik Lal S/o.Rajendran. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on the complaint given by one Ramanik Lal against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 4. The petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. Wi...
P. Veerachamy Vs. State Represented by, The Superintendent of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to further investigate the case in S.C.No.78 of 2014 pending before the Special Court of P.C.R.cases, Pudukkottai in Crime No.176 of 2013 on the file of the 3rd respondent Police and file additional final report before the concerned court.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd respondent to further investigate the case in S.C.No.78 of 2014 pending before the Special Court of P.C.R.cases, Pudukkottai in Crime No.176 of 2013 on the file of the 3rd respondent Police and file additional final report before the concerned court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that for the incident that took place on 29.09.2013, the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.176 of 2013 and completed the investigation and also filed a final report, which was taken on file in S.C.No.78...
S. Naina Mohammed and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in Crime No.97 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in Crime No.97 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.97 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 379 (NH) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / A1 to A4. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police, namely, Mr.P.Thambidurai, Special Sub-Inspector of Police, Vachakarapatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District. Learned counsel appearing for the parties also endorsed the identify...
M.P. Karthikeyan Vs. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Society, Kar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records connected with Na.Ka.No.3626/2005/Saba dated 30.01.2012 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records connected with Na.Ka.No.3626/2005/Saba dated 30.01.2012 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal. 2. The order impugned is a communication between the Deputy Registrar and the Superintendent of Police in respect of a complaint pursuant to the findings under Section 81 enquiry. 3. Though the writ petitioner challenged that order, in view of the non-payment of batta, the writ petition was dismissed as early as on 25.10.2013 as against the second respondent. But, even today, according to him, no action has been taken. 4. In view of the same, nothing...
Jhansi Rani Versu State represented by The Inspector of Police, Dindig ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to file a final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Dindigul in Crime No.559 of 2014 pending on the file of the respondent police within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to file a final report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Dindigul in Crime No.559 of 2014 pending on the file of the respondent police. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the investigation in Crime No.559 of 2014 has been completed and a final report has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2 (FAC), Dindigul on 16.03.2016, which was taken on file in C.C.No.102 of 2016. 3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
S. Veerachamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere into the civil dispute and compel the delivery of the possession of the petitioner's property to the 3rd respondent in Survey NO.967/2 to an extent of 2.080 Acre, Kottayur Village, T.Krishnapuram, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere into the civil dispute and compel the delivery of the possession of the petitioner's property to the 3rd respondent in Survey NO.967/2 to an extent of 2.080 Acre, Kottayur Village, T.Krishnapuram, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint, given by one Rajagopal against this petitioner, a petition enquiry in CSR No.62 of 2016 was conducted and the same was closed on 11.03.2016 3. Recording the said submission, ...
Abdul Rahman and Others Vs. Vedasandur Vasanthanagar Kudiyiruppor Sang ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to expedite the disposal of the suit in O.S.No.78 of 2010 on the file of District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Vedasandur, within a period as fixed by this Court.) 1. The Civil Revision Petition is filed to direct the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.78 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a time frame, that may be fixed by this Court. 2. The revision petitioners are defendants. The respondent is the plaintiff. 3. The respondent filed O.S.No.78 of 2010, on the file of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, for declaration and permanent injunction. The petitioner filed written statement, but, the trial is not yet commenced. Even after filing written statement, the suit has been unnecessarily adjourned without assigning any valid reason and therefore, the petitioner has filed the pre...
Chellammal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint on 15.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint on 15.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint dated 15.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.89 of 2016 for offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....