Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Eswaran Vs. The Inspector of Police (Crime), Madurai City

Eswaran vs The Inspector of Police (Crime), Madurai City

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 06, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191609

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5144 of 2016
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Eswaran

Respondent

The Inspector of Police (Crime), Madurai City

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one ramanik lal s/o.rajendran.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one ramanik lal s/o.rajendran. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state and perused the materials placed on record. 3. it is represented by the learned government advocate (crl.side) that, on the complaint given by one ramanik lal against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending. 4. the petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an fir and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one Ramanik Lal S/o.Rajendran.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the complaint of one Ramanik Lal S/o.Rajendran.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record.

3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on the complaint given by one Ramanik Lal against this petitioner, petition enquiry is pending.

4. The petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial