Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devaraj Vs. Muthuvalli
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order, dated 11.02.2016, made in I.A.No.815 of 2015 in O.S.No.68 of 2007, on the file of the Sub Judge,Pudukkottai.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decretal order, dated 11.02.2016, made in I.A.No.815 of 2015 in O.S.No.68 of 2007, on the file of the Sub Judge, Pudukkottai. 2. The petitioner is the defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff in the Suit. The respondent filed the Suit in O.S.No.68 of 2007 for specific performance. The petitioner in his written statement denied that he agreed to sell the suit property to the respondent. On the other hand, he stated that he borrowed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- from the respondent. The respondent insisted the petitioner to execute the agreement of sale and sign in the blank promissory note. The respondent filled up the promissory note as though petitioner borrowed money from one Palanisamy ...
V. Mallika Vs. The Director, Medical and Rural Health Services, Chenna ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents No.4 and 6 to allow the petitioner to open and run a Aavin Booth within the precincts of the N.R.K.R.Rajarathinam Government Hospital, Sivakasi so as to sell the Aavin Milk and Milk products based on the dealership order passed by the fourth respondent vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.293/Mkg-Agent/2015 dated 23.06.2015 as this Court passed by this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petitionis for a Mandamus to direct the respondents No.4 and 6 to allow the petitioner to open and run a Aavin Booth within the precincts of the N.R.K.R.Rajarathinam Government Hospital, Sivakasi so as to sell the Aavin Milk and Milk products based on the dealership order passed by the fourth respondent vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.293/Mkg-Agent/2015 dated 23.06.2015. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Gover...
R. Murugesan Vs. The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corp ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to complete the enquiry pending in file Na.Ka.No.A1/1447/2012-Sri dated 31.01.2014 issued by the second respondent and pass other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petitionis for a Mandamus to direct the respondents to complete the enquiry pending in file Na.Ka.No.A1/1447/2012-Sri dated 31.01.2014 issued by the second respondent. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court even the alleged document sought for by the respondents has been sent by registered post by the petitioner on 19.03.2016. 3. As the application is pending before the second respondent, the second respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the...
Kali Vs. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the order dated 17.12.2015 in Cr.M.P.No.7149 of 2015 in S.C.No. 134 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli Tirunelveli District.) 1. This petitioner has been filed to set aside the order dated 17.12.2015 in Cr.M.P.No.7149 of 2015 in S.C.No.134 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli Tirunelveli District. 2. The petitioner is facing prosecution in S.C.No.134 of 2015 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli for offences under Sections 294(b) and 302 IPC. During the course of trial, the prosecution filed a petition in Cr.M.P.No.7149 of 2105 in S.C.No.134 of 2015 under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for examining Dr.Radhna Pethmurugan and Dr.Nirmalkumar as additional witnesses. The accused strongly objected to the examination by filing a counter. The Trial Court considered the rival submissions and allowed the petition on 17.12.2015, challenging which...
Muthumurugan Vs. The District Collector, Virudhunagar District and Ano ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to lease out the fishery right to the petitioner for the Fasli year 1425 of Podipithan Kanmai situated in Singammalpuram Village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District, considering the petitioner's deposit amount of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) for the Fasli 1454 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petitionis for a Writ of Mandamus to directing the second respondent to lease out the fishery right to the petitioner for the Fasli year 1425 of Podipithan Kanmai situated in Singammalpuram Village, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District, considering the petitioner's deposit amount of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) for the Fasli 1454. 2. Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.M.Raja Rajan, takes ...
A. Sajitha Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District and O ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-01-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent proceeding in Pa.Mu.Pe.4/1261/2014 dated 24.07.2014 and quash the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent proceeding in Pa.Mu.Pe.4/1261/2014 dated 24.07.2014 and quash the same. 2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3. The impugned order is liable to be set aside only on the ground of violation of Principles of natural justice, as notice for enquiry on 22.07.2014 was only served on him on 22.07.2014, as per the postal cover produced by the petitioner. Definitely, he could not have appeared on the same day. 4. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted back...