Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Marirajan Vs. State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Prohibiti ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD) 5645/2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the case in C.C.No.145 of 2014 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudhunagar to any other competent court in Thoothukudi District for conducting trial within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court. Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD) 5646/2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the case in C.C. No. 196 of 2015 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arupukottai to any other competent court in Thoothukudi District for conducting trial and pronouncing judgement within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD) 5647/2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the case in C.C. No. 286 of 2015 pending on the file o...
Nathu K. Patel Vs. State Rep. by The Commissioner of Police, Trichy an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents and their officials not to harass the petitioner and his family members unnecessarily against law under the guise of enquiry.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents and their officials not to harass the petitioner and his family members unnecessarily against law under the guise of enquiry. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that, on the complaint given by one Mohammed Hanifa, Paulraj and Periasamy against this petitioner, petition enquiries are pending. 4. The petitioner is directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, he shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and ...
Platinum Textiles Ltd. Vs. The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the letter made in SE/RMD/DFC/HT/AS/F Dkt/D.No.1046/12 dated 30.03.2012 issued by the third respondent and quash the same as as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Certiorari to call for the records relating to the letter made in SE/RMD/DFC/HT/AS/F Dkt/D.No.1046/12 dated 30.03.2012 issued by the third respondent and quash the same. 2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted a memo stating as follows:- MEMO "In the aforesaid writ petition the petitioner is seeking to quash the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent. The 2nd respondent has issued circular dated 12.03.2012 stating that "OA consumer shall install meeting system with ABT meter and associated CT/PT as per CEA regulations." Based upon the circular the 2...
Dharmaraj Vs. The Inspector of Police, Pudukadai Police Station, Kanya ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members in any manner.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members in any manner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that there are two criminal cases registered against the petitioner's son and therefore, the police had gone to the house of the petitioner in search of his son. 3. Under such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the usual order of Not to Harass cannot be passed in this case and the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the Police in the investigation. During interrogation, he shall not be harassed and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest....
Nagalingam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 11.02.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 11.02.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It appears that the 3rd respondent is none other than the son of the petitioner and he is causing trouble to the petitioner. The petitioner has sent a complaint dated 11.02.2016 to the respondents, in which, a petition enquiry is pending. 4. Under such circumstances, the 2nd respondent is directed to enquire into the complaint and take action in accordance with law and give protection to the petitioner, who is a Senior...
Sethu Thamilarasan Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, V ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to conduct a fair and proper investigation and to file a final report in Crime No.372 of 2014 dated 13.05.2014 pending on the file of the respondent police within a stipulated time fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to conduct a fair and proper investigation and to file a final report in Crime No.372 of 2014 dated 13.05.2014 pending on the file of the respondent police. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the investigation in Crime No.372 of 2014 has been completed and a final report has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil on 16.06.2014 itself and the same has not yet been take on file. 3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Sudalai Muthu Nadar Vs. State Represented by The Superintendent of Pol ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent Nod.2 and 3 to expedite the investigation in Crime No.204 of 2013 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, Authoor Police Station, Thoothukudi District and to file a final report within the stipulated period as prescribed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent Nod.2 and 3 to expedite the investigation in Crime No.204 of 2013 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, Authoor Police Station, Thoothukudi District and to file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the investigation in Crime No.204 of 2013 has been completed and a final report has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur, which was taken on file in P.R.C.No.10 of 2016. 3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Orig...
P.N. Ramesh Babu and Others Vs. M. Cheemaichamy, The Deputy Superinten ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue of a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from passing any orders from reopening the Arulmigu Sikkumallammal Temple, Kattunayakkanpatti, Theni District to fix a date for worship and celebrate the temple festival by violating the customary rights and practice.W.P.(MD)No.3880 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for all records of the second respondent made on 19.2.2016 and quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to grant permission and provide necessary protection to the petitioner and their community members to worship and celebrate their annual festival at Arulmighu Sikkumallammal Temple, Kattunayaganpatti, Theni District in the month of February or thereafter by giving permission giving 7 dyas time for the petitioner to observe fasting penance a...
V. Vellaisamy Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Madura ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry in connection with Crime No.166 of 2015.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry in connection with Crime No.166 of 2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint given by one Muniyandi, a case in Crime No.166 of 2015 has been registered and investigation is in progress. 3. Under such circumstances, once a regular FIR has been registered, the question of 'not to harass' will not arise, because the expression 'harassment' is so subjective that it cannot be encapsulated in an objective criteria. If a 'not to harass order is passed in this case, where a regular FIR has been registered, a notice by the Investigating Officer under Section 41A can also...
Allapitchai Vs. M. Abdulraheem
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-06-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to withdraw the case in C.C.No.12 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Virudhunagar and transfer the same to any other Judicial Magistrate Court, Chennai.) 1. This petition has been filedto withdraw the case in C.C.No.12 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Virudhunagar and transfer the same to any other Judicial Magistrate Court, Chennai. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred to as the complainant and the accused. 3. It is seen that the complainant lodged a private complaint in C.C.No.12 of 2016 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudhunagar against the accused for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. 4. It is the contention of the accused that when he went to the Court in connection with the said case, he was waylaid by the opposite party and was assaulted on 17.03.2016. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »