Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.C.P.V. Thavidan @ Karuppanan Vs. State represented by The Commission ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Madurai City / 2nd Respondent herein to register the Petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2016 as an FIR within the stipulated period as prescribed by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Madurai City / 2nd Respondent herein to register the Petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2016 as an FIR within the stipulated period as prescribed by this Honourable Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the complaint dated 04.03.2016 has been forwarded to the Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the Inspector of Police, D-1, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai along with this order an...
A. Pirama Nayagam @ Bramma Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 27.01.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 27.01.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 27.01.2016 has been sent by post to the 1st respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 27.01.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. With the above direction, this Criminal Original...
M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. P. Micheal Britto @ Br ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: This Petition filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree in M.C.O.P.No.2368 of 1999, dated 21.10.2005 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, I Additional District Court (P.C.R.), Tiruchirapalli.) 1. Being aggrieved over the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, I Additional District Court (P.C.R.) Tiruchirapalli made in M.C.O.P.No.2368 of 1999, dated 21.10.2005, the present appeal has been filed. 2. The appellant is the second respondent in M.C.O.P.No.2368 of 1999. The first respondent is the claimant. The second respondent is the owner of the lorry. The third respondent is the owner of the Auto. The fourth respondent is the Insurance Company of the Auto. 3. Facts of the Case:- The first respondent filed claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation for the injury sustained by him in the accident that took place on 01.08.1999. According to the first respondent, he was travelling in an Au...
A. Bama @ Sathiya Bama Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kanyakumari ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-12-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in A3/1623/2014 dated 28.07.2014 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the first respondent to restore the patta in RTR 380/2014 dated 09.04.2014 stands in the name of the petitioner and pass further orders as this may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in A3/1623/2014 dated 28.07.2014 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the first respondent to restore the patta in RTR 380/2014 dated 09.04.2014 stands in the name of the petitioner. 2. The only point which has been raised by the petitioner is that the Revenue Divisional Officer has no power to directly set aside the order of the Ta...
Naganathan and Another Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to the proceedings in CC.No.102 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magaistrate No.II, Ramnad and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records relating to the proceedings in CC.No.102 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magaistrate No.II, Ramnad and quash the same. 2. It is seen that on the complaint lodged by Nesa Kumar/2nd respondent, the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.281 of 2014 on 10.11.2014 under Sections 341, 324 and 506(ii) IPC against Naganathan and Kaleeswaran and after completing the investigation, also filed a final report in C.C.No.102 of 2015 for the said offences, challenging which the petitioner, who are accused, are before this Court. 3. It is the case of the prosecution that on 09.11.2014, the accused attacked the defacto complainant and the defacto complainant got admitted in the Governme...
R. Thirukumar Vs. The State Rep.by The District Collector, Virudhungar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 19.11.2015 and pass appropriate orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner challenges the inclusion of the names in the patta who are arrayed as respondents 4 to 25. First of all, the petitioner shall apply the certified copy of the same to establish his case, to state that the patta was transferred to the respondents 4 to 25. Thereafter only if at all the petitioner is aggrieved, he has to file an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, to get appropriate relief. 2. Hence, the petitioner is directed to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if he so desires. No costs....
S. Paramasivam Vs. The District Collector, Theni District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus by directing the third respondent to allot pathway to the petitioner's temple namely Sri Ramapiran and Karuppasamy Temple situated in S.No.217/2 at B.Meenakshipuram Village, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District through the Government poromboke land situated in S.No.217/1 as per the recommendation of the fourth respondent dated 06.05.2015 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to allot pathway to the petitioner's temple namely Sri Ramapiran and Karuppasamy Temple situated in S.No.217/2 at B.Meenakshipuram Village, Bodinayakanur Taluk, Theni District through the Government poromboke land situated in S.No.217/1 as per the recommendation of the fourth respondent dated 06.05.2015. 2. Mr.S.Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the r...
Geetha Vs. The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-11-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful running of the proposed shop bearing in Survey No.155/30, Seemanoothu Panchayat, Usilampatti Panchayat Union, Madurai District, except due process of law and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. In view of the fact that the issue involved in all the writ petitions is one and the same, these writ petitions are taken up together and disposed of by a common order. 2. After some elaborate arguments made by both sides, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners have been allotted the place for putting up the shops and they paid full amount to the fourth respondent, namely, the Panchayat President. According to the Panchayat President, the Panchayat also pointed out the place for putting up the shops. When the petitioners ha...
Nalini and Others Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Bo ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records in Crime No.189 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and to quash the same as illegal.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in Crime No.189 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and to quash the same as illegal. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that investigation has been completed and a final report has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bodi on 16.03.2016. 3. Recording the same, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioners to work out their liberty in accordance with law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
Christopher and Others Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-11-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records as made in C.C.No. 164 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District by the 1st Respondent in connection with Crime No.166 of 2003 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Nesamani Nagar Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records as made in C.C.No. 164 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District by the 1st Respondent in connection with Crime No.166 of 2003 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Nesamani Nagar Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District and quash the same. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that trial in the case has commenced and about three witnesses have been examined. 3. Under such circumstances, this Court will not at ...