Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Madasamy Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the matter purely civil in nature which is pending adjudication before the competent civil court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner by interfering in the civil issue relating to money dispute forthwith. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would, on instructions from the respondent police, submit that on the complaint given by one Thambiraj against this petitioner, a petition enquiry in CSR No.59 of 2016 was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Muthukumar @ Kumar and Others Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 16.2.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 16.2.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 16.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. 3. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
K.R. Raviselvan Vs. State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Thennilai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6319 of 2016: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent police to expedite the investigation in Crime No.129 of 2012 dated 26.09.2010 and file the Final Report within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.) (Prayer Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6680 of 2016: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the case in Crime No.129 of 2012 (originally on the file of Thennilai Police Station) which is now pending on the file of the 2nd respondent to any other impartial investigating agency or investigating officer in the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police or Additional Deputy Superintendent of Police.) 1. The minimum facts that are required for deciding these petitions are as follows: 2. On the complaint alleged by one Raviselvan, Thennilai Police registered a case in Crime.No.129 of 2012 on 26.09.2012 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 447, 294(b), 324, 307, 506(ii) and 379 IPC and Section 3 of t...
The Young Men's Christian Association, Madurai and Others Vs. M. Solom ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records relating to the Order of interim injunction in I.A.No.153 of 2016 in O.S.No.264 of 2016 dated 12.04.2016 on the file of the Court of Madurai Town District Munsiff Judge, at Madurai to set aside the same and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition challenges the order in I.A.No.153 of 2016 in O.S.No.264 of 2016 on the file of the Madurai Town District Munsiff Judge. In O.S.No.264 of 2016, plaintiff, a member of the first defendant association has sought a declaration that the resolution dated 23.12.2015 extending the office of the 5th defendant as General Secretary beyond 62 years is illegal and void and to the resolution dated 23.12.2015 appointing the 6th defendant as Assistant General Secretary, a post nonest as per the bye-law is illegal and void and to pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the 5th and 6th defen...
P. Muthukumar and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Office of t ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and pass such further or other orders.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would, on instructions from the respondent police, submit that neither a case nor a petition enquiry is pending against this petitioner on the file of the respondent police. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Murugesan and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli Dis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.3.2016 and take necessary action within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.3.2016 and take necessary action within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 12.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 12.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken ther...
A. Muthusamy Vs. State represented by The Commissioner of Police, Tric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.3.2016 and take necessary action against the proposed accused persons.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.3.2016 and take necessary action against the proposed accused persons. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 18.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 18.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if...
Ramkumar Raja and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathap ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners in the guise of enquiry.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners in the guise of enquiry. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record. 3. It is seen that based on the complaint a case in Crime No.180 of 2016 for Women Missing has been registered. 4. Under such circumstances, the petitioners are directed to participate in the enquiry and during enquiry, they shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioners against arrest. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of....
V. Kalyani Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Common Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 19.2.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register an FIR on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner herein dated 19.2.2016 and investigate the case in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials placed on record. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 19.02.2016, it is seen that the petitioner has entered into a sale agreement dated 14.09.2007 with the opposite parties under which the petitioner had given Rs.30,000/- to the opposite parties and had also permitted them to stay in the house and pay him rent. Now, it is alleged by the petitioner that the opposite parties are neither vacating the...
P. Rathinakumar Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st Respondent to instruct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the Petitioner and to pass other or further orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st Respondent to instruct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the Petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would, on instructions from the respondent police, submit that neither a case nor a petition enquiry is pending against this petitioner on the file of the respondent police. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....