Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Aruppukottai Vs. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the common judgment and decree, dated 29.10.2001, made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.843 of 2009, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Madurai.) 1. All these C.M.As. and C.R.P.(MD) No.1039 of 2006 arise out of compensation awarded due to the accident that took place on 05.10.1998. The issue involved in all these matters is one and the same and therefore, all the cases are disposed of by this common judgment. 2. C.M.A.(MD) No.91 of 2011 is filed by the claimant in M.C.O.P.No.1373 of 2000, for enhancement of compensation. 3. The respondent/s who has/have filed claim petitions are referred to as claimant/s, the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Madurai is referred to as the first respondent, V.V.R. Transport is referred to as the second respondent and the United India Insurance Company is referred to as the third respondent. 4. The claimants are legal heirs of deceased ...
V. Vinothkumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent to register a complaint of the petitioner dated 28.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law and also file the final report.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent to register a complaint of the petitioner dated 28.02.2016 and investigate the same in accordance with law and also file the final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 28.02.2016, it essentially appears to be a money dispute between the petitioner and the opposite party. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. Accordingly, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to ...
M. Antony Nikulos Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner in vide CSR No.0852 dated 14.3.2016 issued by the 1st respondent within a time frame stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner in vide CSR No.0852 dated 14.3.2016 issued by the 1st respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who would submit that on the complaint dated 14.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.424 of 2016 dated 08.02.2016 for offences under Sections 294(b) and 324 IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is clos...
Rajesh and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein not to harass the petitioner in name of enquiry without due process of law and pass such further or other orders.) 1. This petition has been filedto direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein not to harass the petitioner in name of enquiry without due process of law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, who would, on instructions from the respondent police, submit that neither a case nor a petition enquiry is pending against this petitioner on the file of the respondent police. 3. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Dr. S. Vijai Vikraman Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Sec ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to establish the sanctioned University for Indian Medicine at Chettikulam, Tirunelveli and further establish all the necessary infrastructure for the 4th respondent College as required under the regulation framed by the 7th respondent.) V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. A Student of 1st year of the Post Graduate Course in the Government Siddha Medical College and Hospital, Palayamkottai, has come up with the above writ petition in public interest, seeking the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to establish the proposed University for Indian Medicine in Chettikulam, Tirunelveli and also to provide all infrastructure for the 4th respondent college. 2. Heard Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.K. Chellapandian, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing...
Anthony Birnath Mary and Another Vs. M. Akbar Ali and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.90 of 2008, dated 14.09.2010, on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dindigul, and to allow the claim petition filed by the appellant.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Judgment passed in M.C.O.P.No.90 of 2008, dated 14.09.2010, on the file of the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal / learned Principal District Judge, Dindigul. 2. The appellants are the claimants. The first respondent is the owner and the second respondent is the Insurance Company of the vehicle, which was involved in the accident. 3. The appellants filed M.C.O.P.No.90 of 2008, claiming a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation for the death of son of the first appellant and brother of the second appellant. The Tribunal dismissed the claim petition, filed by the appellants. Against that order of dismissal, the appellants have fil...
R. Jeyalakshmi and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruchirap ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 4.2.2016 and 11.2.2016 in accordance with law and conduct investigation. 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 4.2.2016 and 11.2.2016 in accordance with law and conduct investigation. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 04.02.2016 and 11.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to...
Annalakshmi and Others Vs. The Inspector of Police, Jaihindpuram Polic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Common Prayer: Petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in Crime Nos.382 and 383 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same.) 1. These petitions have been filed seeking to quash the cases registered in Crime Nos.382 and 383 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent, pursuant to the amicable settlement effected between the parties. 2. It is seen that a case in Crime No.382 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC, has been registered against the petitioners / A1 to A4 in Crl.O.P.(MD)6853/2016 and in respect of Crime No.383 of 2016, a case has been registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 324 and 506(ii) IPC. 3. When these matters are taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondents in both cases, appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the A...
S. Velu Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case as per the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.08.2015 and pass such further orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and thus render justice.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case as per the complaint of the petitioner dated 24.08.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who would submit that on the complaint dated 24.08.2015, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.196 of 2016 for offences under Sections 294(b), 406 and 506(i) IPC r/w Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
F. Francis Bastiyan Vs. The Commissioner of Police Trichy City, Trichy ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 19.2.2016 within the period stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaintated 19.2.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 19.02.2016 given by the petitioner to the 1st respondent has been forwarded to the Inspector of Police, Cantonment Police Station, Trichy. 3. In view of the above submission, the Inspector of Police, Cantonment Police Station, Trichy is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall co-operate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the Inspector of Police, Cantonment Pol...