Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A. Muthusamy Vs. State represented by The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City

A. Muthusamy vs State represented by The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 21, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191241

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 6103 of 2016
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Muthusamy

Respondent

State represented by The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.3.2016 and take necessary action against the proposed accused persons.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.3.2016 and take necessary action against the proposed accused persons. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side), who would submit that the complaint dated 18.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. in view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 18.03.2016. on receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.3.2016 and take necessary action against the proposed accused persons.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 18.3.2016 and take necessary action against the proposed accused persons.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 18.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents.

3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 18.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial