Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Antony Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR forthwith based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 01.02.2014 and pass such further or other suitable order as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register an FIR forthwith based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 01.02.2014. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that on the complaint dated 01.02.2014 given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.54 of 2014 and since the petitioner did not cooperate in the enquiry, the same is kept pending. Thereafter, the petitioner, as a follow up, has sent another complaint dated 26.02.2016 by post. Therefore, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry pending in CSR No.54 of 2014...
Balasubbulakshmi Vs. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondent to register an FIR based on the petitioner's complaint dated 5.2.2016 and investigate the same accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register an FIR based on the petitioner's complaint dated 5.2.2016 and investigate the same accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 05.02.2016 has been sent by post to the respondent. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 05.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offenc...
Kalidas Vs. The Superintendent of Police Dindigul District and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent herein to conduct the enquiry and file a final report in respect of the Crime No. 145/2013 registered on 28.06.2013 on the file of the 2nd respondent.) 1.This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent herein to conduct the enquiry and file a final report in respect of the Crime No. 145/2013 registered on 28.06.2013 on the file of the 2nd respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the investigation has been completed and a charge sheet has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul on 02.04.2016 itself. 3. In view of the above submission, this petition is closed....
N.A.K. Gopalakrishna Raja Vs. The District Collector, Theni District a ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-20-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating with the impugned notice issued by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.35611/2011/C4, dated 25.01.2016 in connection with the appeal against the order of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.35611/2011/C4, dt.07.12.2015 filed by the 3rd respondent and quash the proceeding as illegal and without jurisdiction.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the owner of the land in Survey No.533 in Theni Allinagaram. He has let out the vacant site to the third respondent for lease and the lease period was over as early as on 15.03.1992. According to the petitioner, even thereafter, the third respondent has not vacated the premises but he is doing business, illegally by getting No Objection Certificate from the second respondent for issuance of licence. Only on the basis of the No Objection Certificate issued by the second respondent, without any valid right he has ...
S. Mohan Vs. The Assistant Engineer, Town/South/TNEB, Sivagangai Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to restore the petitioner's Service connection in S.C.No.402007392 forthwith and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition and to that effect he has also sent a letter dated 15.04.2016 to the Registry to post this writ petition for withdrawal. 2. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, Madurai Vs. A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.04.2000 made in MCOP.No.747 of 1996, MCOP.No.749 of 1996 and MCOP.No.748 of 1996 respectively on the file the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Principal District Judge, Dindigul.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed against the Judgment and Decree, dated 20.04.2000 made in MCOP.No.747 of 1996, MCOP.No.749 of 1996 and MCOP.No.748 of 1996 respectively on the file the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Principal District Judge, Dindigul. 2. The appellant, Insurance Company is the third respondent in all MCOPs. The respondents 1 to 4 in CMA(MD).No.1403 of 2010 are legal heirs of deceased Pechiammal / claimants. The first respondent in both CMA(MD).No.1404 of 2010 and CMA.(MD).No.1405 of 2010 are the claimants, injured persons. The fifth respondent in CMA(MD).Nos.1403 of 2010 and second respondent in CMA.(MD)No.1404 of 2010 and fourth respondent ...
P. Karnan Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to stop the works under the Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Virudhunagar District which was allotted without following due process of law and consequently directing the 1 and 2 respondents to take appropriate action against the third respondent and pass orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. On 11.04.2016, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted on 12.04.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed....
M. Muthumari Vs. The Chairperson/Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass orders to grant property situated at Plot No.,6, Block B3 at S.No.537/2 of Pandavarmangalam Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticorin Revenue District under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1958 by way of issuing patta to the petitioner on the basis of the representation dated 13.01.2016 sent by the petitioner and to pass any other order as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider and pass orders to grant property situated at Plot No.,6, Block B3 at S.No.537/2 of Pandavarmangalam Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticorin Revenue District under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1958 by way of issuing patta to the petitioner on the basis of the representation dated 13.01.2016 sent by the petitioner. 2...
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Madurai Division Vs. T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.09.1998 made in MCOP.No.317 of 1997, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Sub Court, Virudhunagar.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree, dated 14.09.1998 made in MCOP.No.317 of 1997, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Sub Court, Virudhunagar. 2. The appellant, Transport Corporation is first respondent and the first respondent is the claimant in MCOP.No.317 of 1997. The second respondent is the owner of vehicle and the third respondent is the Insurance Company. 3. The first respondent filed claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.2,15,000/- as compensation for the injury suffered by her in the accident took place on 30.12.1991. 4. According to the first respondent, she was travelling in the bus belonging to the appellant, Transport Corporation. At that time, the bus belonging to the ...
T. Baskar Vs. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable E ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to conduct Chithirai festival to Arulmigu Perumal Swamy Temple, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District to be held on 28.04.2016 to 30.04.2016 by collecting tax and donation from the worshippers and local people and not to allow the third respondent in the administration of the above temple and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition to direct the second respondent to strictly follow the decision taken in the Peace Committee Meeting held on 09.05.2015 and consequently, direct the second respondent to permit the festival committee to conduct Chithirai Varudhabhisega Thiruvizha scheduled from 28.04.2016 to 30.04.2016 in Arulmigu Perumal Swamy Thirukkovil, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District. 2. According to the petitioner, he wants to implement the order passed in the Peace Com...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »