Andhra Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Nuggest Estates Private Limited Rep Vs. Government of Andhra Prad ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.3319 o5. 3-2013 M/s. Nuggest Estates Private Limited Rep. by its Managing Director Smt. Nirmala Reddy, Secunderabad Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Secretary Department of Revenue, A.P. Secretariat Hyderabad, and three others HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Prabhakar Sripada Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: AGP for Revenue Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Sri S.Lakshminarayana Reddy ?CASES REFERRED:1. (1911) 13 BLR 109.2. AIR 191.P.C....
M.Varthamma and Others Vs. Kannappa and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Second Appeal No.47 o05. 03.2013 M.Varthamma and others Kannappa and others Counsel for appellants: Sri K.G.Krishna Murthy Counsel for Respondents: Sri S.S.Bhatt HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred JUDGMENT: The plaintiffs in O.S.No.17 of 1985 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Chittoor, are the appellants. The suit was filed for the relief of declaration of title, in respect of suit schedule property of an extent of Ac.1.78 cents of land in survey No.122/2B of Madireddipalle Revenue Village, erstwhile Bangarupalem Mandal, Chittoor District. The case of the appellants was that the land is held by themselves and their ancestors for a long period of about 100 years and that the respondents, who have Ac.1.04 cents in the immediate neighbourhood, are trying to interfere with their possession without any basis. It was also pleaded that the land in survey No.122/2 comprising of Acs.2.82 cents was sub-divided into survey No.122/2A with Ac.1.04 cents ...
Smt. Bommakanti Venkavva Vs. the Union of India, Represented by Its U
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6387 OF 201.05-03-2013 Smt. Bommakanti Venkavva The Union of India, represented by its Under Secretary, F.F. Division, Ministry of Home Affairs, Lok Nayak Bhavan, Khan Market, New Delhi & 2 others Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K. Jagadishwar Reddy Counsel for the respondents: HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED: C/15 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to proceeding No.112/5982/86-FF(HC), dated 09-05-2011, issued by respondent No.1 and to quash the same. I have heard Mr. K. Jagadishwar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner, who is the Widow of an alleged freedom fighter, has been struggling for getting freedom fighters' pension from the year 2002. The petitioner is made to approach this Court earlier by way of W.P. No.26175 of 2008. This Court has disposed of the said writ petition, by order, date...
Sri Erram Sharath Babu Alias Sharath Red Vs. Smt. Erram Anitha W/O. Sh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M.A. No.406 OF 200.04.03.2013 Sri Erram Sharath Babu alias Sharath Reddy s/o. Madhusudhan Reddy Smt. Erram Anitha w/o. Sharath Babu Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. D.Bhaskar Reddy Counsel for Respondent: Mr. T.Ramulu HEAD NOTE: Referred Cases: (2005) 2 SCC 2.JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice B.N. Rao Nalla) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed assailing the order dated 24.07.2003 in O.P. No.22 of 1999 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, whereby and whereunder the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act') seeking divorce against the respondent, was dismissed.2. The appellant herein is the petitioner - husband and the respondent herein is the respondent - wife in the O.P. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the O.P.3. The brief averments of the petition are that...
Pasupuleti Bala Gangadhar Vs. State of A.P., Reptd., by Its Principal
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6270 o04. 03.2013 Pasupuleti Bala Gangadhar State of A.P., reptd., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department, Hyderabad and two others. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Sita Ram Chaparla Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Revenue : ?CITATIONS:2013. 2)ALD 1 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside order, dated 18.01.2013, of respondent No.2, whereby he has refused to register the sale deed sought to be presented by the petitioner in respect of house property admeasuring Ac.0.09 cents comprised in Survey No.272/2 of Avanigadda Revenue Village and Mandal, Krishna District. I have heard Sri Sita Ram Chaparla, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the only ground on which respondent No.2 refused to register the sale deed sought to be presented by the p...
J.Krishna Vs. Maliram Agarwal and 16 Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5192 o04. 03-2013 J.Krishna Maliram Agarwal and 16 others Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri A.Pulla Reddy Counsel for the Respondents 2 to 8: Sri Bankatlal Mandhani : : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 199.Supreme Cour2. 1999(1) ALT 22.ORDER: This revision petition is filed under Section 115 C.P.C questioning order passed by the lower Court refusing to send admitted signatures and disputed signatures in the documents to an expert for the purpose of comparison and report. It is stated that the respondents 1 to 8 after obtaining decree for possession of the suit property in O.S. No.682 of 1982, filed E.P. No.72 of 2007 in the lower Court for delivery of possession against the respondents 9 to 17 who are the judgment debtors and that in that execution petition, the petitioner filed a claim petition (?) by way of E.A. No.142 of 2011 under Order XXI Rule 97 C.P.C claiming himself to be tenant in the decree schedule propert...
Alla Nagireddy Vs. G.Narayana Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU SECOND APPEAL No.1090 OF 199.01.03.2013 Alla Nagireddy G.Narayana Reddy JUDGMENT: Unfortunate plaintiff, who failed in both the courts below, is the appellant in the second appeal. He filed the suit for recovery of Rs.11,900/- from the defendant on the basis of Ex.A1 promissory note dated 1.7.1979 executed by the defendant in favour of one Narayanamma. Narayanamma is no more. Execution of Ex.A1 pronote by the defendant after receiving the consideration thereunder is admitted. Plea of the defendant is one of discharge of the amount to Narayanamma when she was alive. The trial court disbelieved the plea of discharge. But the trial court, after trial, dismissed the suit on the ground that Ex.A3 succession certificate dated 20.12.1988 in favour of the plaintiff is invalid. On appeal by the plaintiff, the lower appellate court dismissed the appeal on the ground that Ex.A3 being certified copy of succession certificate, no decree can be passed ...
The Commissioner and Director of Agricul Vs. M/S.Omkar Fertilizers Pvt ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI CHIEF JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WA Nos.1049; 1624 of 2012 and WPNos.30856 of 2012 and Batch 01.03.2013 WRIT APPEAL Nos.1049 and 1624 of 2012 The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Hyderabad and another M/s.Omkar Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad and others Counsel for the Appellants: ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL GP FOR AGRICULTURE Counsel for the Respondents: MR.C.V.MOHAN REDDY FOR MR. S. SRINIVAS REDDY WP.Nos.30856 of 2012; 6284 of 2011and 24537 of 2010 M/s. Gangothri Nutrients and Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd and others The Principal Secretary Agriculture Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. D. PRAKASH REDDY for MR. M. GOVIND REDDY MR. V.R. REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for Respondents: ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL GP FOR AGRICULTURE : Cases referred:1. (2003) 5 SCC 43.2. (1981) 2 SCC 60.3. AIR 200.SC 65.4. (2011) 5 SCC 34.5. (2001) 3 SCC 63.WRIT APPEAL Nos.1049 and 1624 of 2012 and WRIT...
Punumacha Ashok Raju @ Ashok S/O. Sitara Vs. Indukuri Venkata Gopala K ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA A.S. Nos.563; 626 OF 201.01.03.2013 Punumacha Ashok Raju @ Ashok s/o. Sitarama krishnam Raju Indukuri Venkata Gopala Krishnam Raju and two others Counsel for the Appellant:: Mr. Venkateswarlu Chakkilam Counsel for Respondent No.1: Mr.M.Adinarayana Raju HEAD NOTE: Referred Cases:1. (1990) 3 SCC 29.2 (1991) 1 SCC 71.3 2004 (1) ALT 65.42004 (2) ALT 75.5 2004(2) ALT 78.6 2010 (4) ALD 31.APPEAL SUIT Nos.563 AND 62.OF 201.COMMON JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice B.N. Rao Nalla) These appeals are filed assailing the common order dated 28th June, 2012 in E.A.No.1 of 2012 in E.P. No.1 of 2012 in O.S.No.10 of 2001 (old E.A.No.30 of 2007 in E.P. No.56 of 2006) and E.A. No.4 of 2012 in E.P.No.2 of 2012 in O.S.No.22 of 1999 (old E.A. No.29 of 2007 in E.P.No.55 of 2006) respectively, on the file of the Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Kovvur.2. The appellant filed claim petitions in E.A.No.1 of 2012 and E.A. No...
D. Syamala Kalyani and Another Vs. M/S. Yashotheja Constructions, Elur ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Member) 1. The complaint is filed seeking direction to the opposite parties seeking the following reliefs: A) allot one 2bk to the complainant no.1 in the same locality or in the alternative direction to the first opposite party to pay Rs.15,40,000/- towards value of the flat and to pay subsequent interest @12% p.a. on the amount of Rs.15,40,0000/- from the date of complaint till payment; B) pay Rs.3,00,000/- towards the amount covered by the post-dated cheques to the complainant no.1 with subsequent interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of complaint till payment C) refund Rs.5,00,000/- plus interest of Rs.1,00,000/- totalling to Rs.6,00,000/- @ 12% p.a. from 14.8.2010 to 16.4.2012 and to pay subsequent interest at 12% pa on Rs.5,00,000/- from the date of complaint till payment D) refund Rs.3,35,000/- plus interest of Rs.18,425/- at 12% pa from 2.11.2011 to 16.04.2012 totalling to Rs.3,53,425/- and to pay subsequent interest at 12% pa on Rs.3,35,000/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›