Andhra Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ranga Lingaiah Vs. Sajjala Venkat Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-25-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU C.R.P.No.5750 o25. 03.2013 Ranga Lingaiah Sajjala Venkat Reddy Counsel for the Appellant: Sri P.Prabhakara Rao Counsel for the respondents: Sri Aravinda Rao Verapally : ?CITATIONS:1. 2002 (6) ALD 10.ORDER The question whether a Power of Attorney holder of the plaintiff is competent to give evidence as such on behalf of the plaintiff, is a question of fact. If the Power of Attorney holder has known the facts relating to the suit personally, then he is always at liberty to give evidence either as Power of Attorney holder or in his personal capacity. The contention that Power of Attorney holder cannot depose the facts which are within the personal knowledge of the plaintiff, who is his principal, depends upon the material deposed by such a witness, who is a Power of Attorney holder. Value to be attached to such a witness depends on assessment of contents of his deposition after the contents are recorded. Therefore, the Power of Attorney hold...
Dr.L.Sudhakar Vs. the Medical Council of India and Two Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-25-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.16305 OF 200.25.03.2013 Dr.L.Sudhakar The Medical Council of India and two others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Polavarapu Srinivas Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri Challa Gunaranjan. Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri V.V.Anil Kumar. Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri D.Prakash Reddy. : : Cases referred:1. W.P (civil) No.317 of 2000 (unreported) 2. (1974) 2 SUPREME COURT CASES 39 3. 2007(4) ALD 13.(LB) 4. AIR 195.SC 54.(1) 5. (2010) 13 SUPREME COURT CASES 21 6. AIR 196.SUPREME COURT 133 7. (2003) 8 Supreme Court Case8. 2011 VII AD (DELHI9. (2004) 8 SC10. AIR 196.S.C11. AIR 196.SUPREME COURT 133 12. 2007 (4) ALD 13.(L.B.) 13. 2006 (2) ALT 28.14. (2010) 4 MLJ 63.15. (1999) 8 SCC 1.ORDER: Heard Sri Polavarapu Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Challa Gunaranjan, learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent, Sri V.V.Anil Kumar, learned standing counsel for the 2nd respondent and Sri D.Prakash Reddy, learned senior ...
Vadde Veeresh and Another Vs. the State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-25-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.74 OF 201.25.03.2013 Vadde Veeresh and another The State of A.P. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy Counsel for respondents 3, 5 to 7, 9 to 11,13 to 16, 18, 19, 37, 39 and 41: Sri V.L.Surendra, Counsel for the respondents 8, 20, 22, 26, 29, 35, 36, 38, 43 & 44: Sri O.Kailasnath Reddy Counsel for the respondents 12, 17, 2427. 28, 30 to 34, 40 and 42: Sri H.Prahalad Reddy, Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor representing the State HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:1. 2002)5 SCC 73.ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Accused Nos.23 and 41 in Sessions Case No.63 of 2009 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Adoni to direct the learned Additional Sessions Judge to proceed with the trial without conducting de nova trial and dispose of the case.2. I have heard Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the p...
Andhra Bank Amadalavalasa Branch Srikakulam Dist. Rep. by Its Branch M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-25-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The first opposite party is the appellant. The first respondent filed complaint with the averments that his mother during her life time had Abhaya Jeevan account with the appellant-bank , with the account no.ABJ-140 and the second respondent issued insurance cover to Abhaya account holders of the appellant-bank for the sum assured Rs.1,00,000/- in case of normal death and Rs.2,00,000/- in the case of accidental death of the account holder. The premium for the insurance policy was deducted from the account of the first respondents mother on prorata basis and paid it to the second respondent-insurance company. The first respondents mother died on 6.12.2009 and he passed on the intimation to the appellant on 23.11.2010 and the appellant through letter dated 7.12.2010 informed him that the second respondent repudiated the claim on the ground that the death of his mother occurred during the lien period of 45 days. The first respondent got issu...
Arshad Ahmed and Another Vs. Mohd. Shujauddin
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR C.R.P No.899 o22. 03.2013 Arshad Ahmed and another Mohd. Shujauddin Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri C. Pratap Reddy and Sri P. Srihari Nath Counsel for Respondents: None appeared. : : ?Cases referred: ORDER: The petitioners are the defendants. The plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale. Contending that the respondents 2 & 3 who are Government Officials are necessary parties to the suit, the defendants filed I.A.No.1090 of 2012 under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC before the trial Court. The trial Court dismissed the application. Assailing the same, the present revision is laid. 2. I am afraid that the petitioners as defendants cannot insist the plaintiff to bring any person as a co-defendant. If it is a case of the defendants that respondents 2 & 3 are necessary parties, the defendants may take advantage of the non-impleading of respondents 2 & 3 and seek for a dismissal of the suit on the ground of non- joinder o...
K. Gangadhar Vs. Apsrtc, Rep.by Its Managing Director,and O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 8028 o22. 03.2013 K. Gangadhar APSRTC, rep.by its Managing Director,& others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V. Narasimha Goud Counsel for the respondents : Sri H. Venu Gopal HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred 1.AIR 197.Supreme Cour2. 2001 (5) ALT 6.3.(2010) 2 Supreme Court Cases 772 ORDER: This Writ Petition is preferred by a driver employed with the 1st respondent Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (henceforth, referred to, for brevity, as 'the Corporation'), challenging the validity of the order of removal passed against him on 17.09.2011 by the 3rd respondent Depot Manager, Kamareddy of the Corporation and the orders passed on 05.05.2012 by the 2nd respondent Regional Manager, Nizamabad, substituting the punishment of removal with that of reduction of pay by two incremental stages, for a period of one year, which will have its effect on future increments, while treating the intervening period as period not spent on dut...
Laxminarsamma and 5 Others Vs. N.Venkatreddy and 21 Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.K.G. SHANKAR C.M.A.No.918 o22. 03-2013 Indian Industrial Growth Fund Limited,Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Atim Kabra Mrs. Anitha Nesanuru and others Counsel for the appellant: Sri S. Ravi, Sr. Counsel Counsel for the Respondent : Sri P. Veera Reddy, for RRs 1 and 2 HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 2011 (3) ALD 79.(DB) JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) Respondents 1 and 2 filed A.O.P.No.38 of 2010 in the Court of the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupathi under Section 9 (II) (b) (d) and (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act'), for interim measures. It was pleaded that there existed three agreements between them and the appellant, on the one hand, and the appellant and respondents 3 and 4, on the other, in relation to business transaction, and that though a request was made for appointment of an Arbitrator, for resolution of the disputes, there was no posit...
Indian Industrial Growth Fund Limited,re Vs. Mrs. Anitha Nesanuru and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.K.G. SHANKAR C.M.A.No.918 o22. 03-2013 Indian Industrial Growth Fund Limited,Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Atim Kabra Mrs. Anitha Nesanuru and others Counsel for the appellant: Sri S. Ravi, Sr. Counsel Counsel for the Respondent : Sri P. Veera Reddy, for RRs 1 and 2 HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 2011 (3) ALD 79.(DB) JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) Respondents 1 and 2 filed A.O.P.No.38 of 2010 in the Court of the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupathi under Section 9 (II) (b) (d) and (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act'), for interim measures. It was pleaded that there existed three agreements between them and the appellant, on the one hand, and the appellant and respondents 3 and 4, on the other, in relation to business transaction, and that though a request was made for appointment of an Arbitrator, for resolution of the disputes, there was no posit...
The Divisional Manager Lic of India, Machilipatnam Krishna District an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The Life Insurance Corporation has filed the appeal challenging the order of the District Forum whereby it was directed to Rs.2,00,000 with interest @6% p.a. thereon and Rs.1,000/- towards costs. 2. The respondents father, Kambala Ankamma during his life time obtained Life Insurance Policy bearing number 673280852 for sum assured of Rs.50,000/- and another life insurance policy bearing number 675711068 for sum assured of Rs.2,00,000/- from the appellant-insurance company. The respondents father died on 28.09.2009. Thereafter, the respondent lodged claim with the appellant-insurance company. The appellant repudiated the claim on the ground that the respondents father while submitting the second proposal suppressed his correct age. 3. Challenging the repudiation made by the opposite party, the respondent filed the complaint before the District Forum stating that both policies were obtained by his father through the same agent of the appell...
Tummala Ramnarayana, S/O.Venkata Jagga R Vs. the State of A.P., Repres ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.177 OF 201.21.03.2013 Tummala Ramnarayana, S/o.Venkata Jagga Rao, 65 years, Retired Employee, 91/12, M.V.P. Colony, Vizag & 4 others The State of A.P., represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad through the Station House Officer, Prakasanagaram P.S., Rajahmundry & another HEAD NOTE: Counsel for Petitioners: S.R.SANKU Counsel for Respondent No.1: ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for Respondent No.2: None appeared ?Cases referred (2010) 7 SCC 66.ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.262 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners-A2 to A6 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. The second respondent-de facto complainant though served with notice has not made her appearance either in person or...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »