Andhra Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hind Re-rolling Industries and Others Vs. Muktar Steels Private Limite ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-07-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU SECOND APPEAL No.285 o07. 03-2013 Hind Re-Rolling Industries and others Muktar Steels Private Limited and others Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri A.Narasimha Reddy Counsel for the Respondents : Sri K.Sankaraiah : : Cases referred:1. AIR 200.Supreme Cour2. 2007(4) ALD 67.JUDGMENT: Unsuccessful defendant Nos.1 and 3 to 6 are the appellants in this second appeal. Subject matter of this second appeal is recording of memorandum of compromise between the plaintiff and the defendants 1 to 6 as per Ex.A.9 (Photostat copy of which is marked as Ex.A.14) as modified by Ex.A.8 modified agreement. When the defendants disputed memorandum of compromise as well as modified agreement, about their correctness and validity, the trial Court made appropriate enquiry on the said points and found Exs.A.9 and A.8 to be true and valid; and accordingly recorded memorandum of compromise covered by Exs.A.9 and A.8 and passed compromise decree in terms thereof. O...
Sonti Venkata Subba Rao Vs. the Legal Manager, Hdfc Bank Cards Divisio ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-07-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the dis-satisfied complainant in CC 953/2010 on the file of the District Consumer Forum -II, Hyderabad. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under: 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant had obtained Jumbo Loan from the opposite party no. 1 for Rs.46,500/- in November, 2005 with an agreed rate of interest @ 15% p.a. repayable in 36 months commencing from January, 2006. As the OP no.1 levied processing charges of Rs.768.65 ps in the first monthly statement not disclosed to and not agreed to by the complainant, he kept on hold payment of 3 EMIs for January to March 2006 while requesting the OPs for waiver. As there was no response, the complainant paid aggregate sum of Rs.49,110/- ( Rs.47,200/- during April, 2006 to September, 2006 and Rs.1910/- in 2007) but the due date for final payment was 31.12.2008. The opposite parties with malafide intention pre-...
Hindu College Committee, Represented by Vs. Shaik Subhani
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO CRP NO.3125 o6. 3-2013 Hindu College Committee, represented by its Secretary and Correspondent, G.T. Road, Guntur and another Shaik Subhani Counsel for the petitioner : Sri N. Sreerama Murthy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri N. Subba Rao, Counsel for respondent. : : ?Cases referred: Oral Order: Heard Sri N. Sreerama Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N. Subba Rao, learned counsel for the respondent. This Civil Revision Petition under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction ) Control Act, 1960 ( for short "the Act") is filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 4.4.2008 in RCA No.16 of 2000 of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur confirming the order dated 24.7.2000 in RCC No.52 of 1997 of the Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Guntur. The petitioners filed the said RCC for eviction of respondent contending that 1st petitioner is the absolute owner of the pro...
Makhteshim-a Gan India Private Limited, S Vs. Department of Agricultur ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6659 o06. 03.2013 Makhteshim-Agan India Private Limited, Shameerpet, Ranga Reddy District, Reptd.,by its Director-Dr.Narahari Pullaiah Department of Agriculture and Co-Operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Reptd., by its Under Secretary to Government of India and another. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.Sri Raghu Ram Senior Counsel for Sri P.Sriram Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Ponnan Ashok Goud Assistant Solicitor General of India : ?CITATIONS: NIL The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner filed this Writ Petition for a Certiorari to quash notice, dated 09.01.2013, of the Under Secretary to the Government of India, Department of Agriculture and Co-Operation, Ministry of Agriculture (hereinafter referred to as respondent No.1). I have heard Sri P.Sri Raghu Ram, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, the learned Assistant Solicitor General of India appea...
Smt.V. Haritha Vs. the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,rep.by I
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.36962 OF 201.06-03-2013 Smt.V. Haritha The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,rep.by its Managing Director, IOCL,G-9, Ali Yavar, Jung Marg, Bandra(East),Mumbai & 4 others. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. M. Surender Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 5 : Mr. P. Prabhakar Counsel for Respondent No.4: Mr. Sharad Sanghi HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED ORDER: The petitioner, who is one of the applicants for appointment as retail outlet dealer of respondent No.1-Indian Oil Corporation Limited (for short 'the Corporation') proposed to be located between Hampapuram and Rapthadu junction on NH-7, filed this Writ Petition feeling aggrieved by the action of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in not giving an opportunity of being considered for such appointment. In response to the advertisement issued on behalf of the Corporation, the petitioner has filed her application. Respondent No.4 also is one such applicant. The last date fixed as 25-11-201...
Dasari Janardhan and Another Vs. M/S Narne Estates Pvt Ltd., Rep. by I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. Both appeals are filed against the order of the District Forum in E.A.No. 88 of 2009. Hence, the appeals are being disposed of by common order. For the sake of felicity of expression, the parties are referred to, as they are referred in the complaint. 2. The District Forum allowed the complaint in C.C.No. 24 of 2007 on 12.09.2007 directing the opposite party to restore the allotment of the plot; collect development charges from the complainant with proportionate interest @12 % p.a. thereon for the delayed period from the date of demand till payment and directed the complainant to return the cheque to the opposite party. 3. It appears the opposite party has not preferred appeal against the order of the District Forum. The opposite party has not complied with the order of the District Forum whereon the complainant filed application under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act in seeking for punishment of the opposite party which ...
Mahendra Finance Service Limited Rep. by Its Manager Vs. Yennamaneni R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. 2. The brief facts as seen from the complaint are that the respondent purchased Mahindra Tractor on 28.9.2007 for a sale consideration of Rs.2,15,000/- from the appellant. The appellant issued a cash receipt in favour of the respondent on the account of Smt Basava Appayyamma who was the original borrower. Since the original borrower committed default in payment of some installments of loan, the appellant seized the vehicle. As per the agreement of contract in between the respondent and the appellant, the appellant ought to have sent NOC papers, sale papers etc., and other connected papers to get the ownership of the vehicle transferred in favour of the respondent. The respondent got made the trailer worth Rs.1,20,000/- to the Tractor to run the same in his area with a view to get income out of it. The respondent could not operate the vehicle due to not transferring the ownership in his favour. The res...
K. Parthasarathy Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company (a Government of I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
Oral Order: (R .Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order of the District forum whereby the appellants complaint was dismissed on the premise that the award passed by Insurance Ombudsman holds good and it is for the appellant to accept the assessment of amount made by the surveyor or get the vehicle repaired and submit fresh claim. 2. The appellant is the owner of the Hero Honda City car bearing No.AP 28 AP 0477 which was insured with the respondent insurance company under insurance policy bearing No.431300/31/3009/11078 for a sum of Rs.5,40,000/-lakh for one year commencing from 20.11.2008 till 19.11.2009. On 16.08.2009 the vehicle met with accident at Kandi Village in RangaReddy district as a result of which the vehicle sustained heavy damage. 3. The appellant informed the respondent insurance company about the accident and it had deputed a surveyor to conduct spot survey. The appellant got the vehicle to...
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. Ma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party insurance company is the appellant. The respondent proprietary concern engaged in cotton business obtained insurance policy bearing number 449/2006 for the goods for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/-for the period commencing from 30.05.2005 till 6.12.2006. On 28.03.2006 afire accident occurred at Surydevara Raghupathi Rao estate which spread to the premises where the respondent had stored the stocks and damage was caused to the stocks. On receiving intimation of the accident, the appellant-insurance company deputed a surveyor who assessed the loss caused to the stocks and submitted his report to the appellant-insurance company. 2. The respondent filed complaint stating that after receiving the report from the surveyor the appellant failed to settle the claim whereon she got issued letter dated 19.06.2007 requesting the appellant to settle the claim . As the claim was not settled, the respondent had filed complaint. 3. The appellan...
injeti Venkata Rami Reddy Vs. State of A.P., rep. by It's Public Prose
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.401 o05. 03-2013 Injeti Venkata Rami Reddy State of A.P., rep. by it's Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Counsel for the petitioner : Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy Counsel for 2nd Respondent: Additional Public Prosecutor : ?Cases referred: (2007) 12 Supreme Court Case2012. (1) ALT (Crl.) 506 (SC) AIR 198.SC 188.ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order dated 15-02-2013 passed in P.R.C.No.7 of 2013 whereby and whereunder, the learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 452, 302 and 307 read with 149 IPC against A-1 to A-19 including the petitioner, who has been arrayed as A-3 and whose name has been deleted in the array of the accused while filing charge sheet in Crime No.21 of 2012 of Allagadda Town P.S. 2. Facts, in brief, are:- Injeti Venkata Raghava Reddy @ Raghava Reddy and Injeti Krishna Reddy were staunch followers of Bhuma Nagi Reddy, Ex. Memb...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »