Andhra Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Anand Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer,adoni, Ku
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-2013
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.9300 o28. 03.2013 M.Anand The Revenue Divisional Officer,Adoni, Kurnool District and another. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.K.V.Raghuveer Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies ?Cases referred:1. AIR 196.SC 126.2. AIR 198.SC 13.= 1980 (4) SCC 37.3. AIR 198.SC 81.= 1981 (1) SCC 66.Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the proceeding in Rc(M).No.313/2013, dated 13-03-2013, of respondent No.1, whereby he has cancelled the petitioner's fair price shop authorization. I have heard Mr.K.V.Raghuveer, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents. The petitioner was the authorised dealer of fair price shop No.11 of K.Thimmapuram Village, Adoni Division, Kurnool District. On the basis of an inspection of the said shop, proceedings were initiated against the petitioner by respondent No.1 and by Order, dated 28-09-2...
N.Malla Reddy Vs. the Prohibition and Excise Superintendent,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-2013
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.9303 o28. 03.2013 N.Malla Reddy The Prohibition & Excise Superintendent,Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy for Mr.P.Sri Harsha Reddy Counsel for the respondent: GP for Prohibition & Excise ?Cases referred:1995. (1) ALD 16.Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent, in suspending the petitioner's A.4 license, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for Sri P.Sri Harsha Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise appearing for the respondent. The petitioner is a retail dealer of Indian Made Liquor holding A.4 license. On 14-03-2013, the Prohibition and Excise officials inspected the petitioner's liquor shop and allegedly found 11 boxes of non-duty paid liquor. Based on the Panchanama and the report submitted by the Inspecting...
K. Harinath Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-2013
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI N.V. RAMANA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.A.No.371 o28. 03-2013 K. Harinath Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and another Counsel for the Appellant: Sri P. Kamalakar Counsel for Respondents: Sri B. Mayur Reddy : ?Cases referred:1. (1999) 5 SCC 65.2. (1991) 1 SCC 53.3. (2000) 7 SCC 76.JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Sri Vilas V. Afzulpurkar) Heard Mr. E. Manohar, learned Senior counsel in support of the appeal and Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The appellant was the writ petitioner in W.P.No.26115 of 2012 which was filed questioning the order of the Chief Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) dated 24-07-2012 whereunder the dealership agreement between the petitioner and the respondents dated 03-07-2009 and distributorship agreement also of even date was terminated forthwith. When the said writ petition was heard by the learned single Judge, learned c...
A.Ranga Reddy, S/O.Parma Reddy, Age: 50 Vs. A.Ram Reddy, S/O.Anantha R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1393 OF 201.28.03.2013 A.Ranga Reddy, S/o.Parma Reddy, Age:50. years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Sankepally Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Rangareddy District. A.Ram Reddy, S/o.Anantha Reddy, Age:30. years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Sankepally Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Rangareddy District. HEAD NOTE: Counsel for Petitioner: Sri Maniklal Yadav Counsel for Respondent: Sri Gaddam Srinivas ?Cases referred 1998 (2) ALT 7 (D.B) ORDER:1. This revision is directed against the order, dated 18.02.2010 passed in I.A. No.366 of 2009 in O.S. No.119 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Parigi, Ranga Reddy District. 2. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.118 of 2008. He filed suit for injunction. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.119 of 2008 for recovery of possession. Both the suits were clubbed together. The plaintiff in O.S.No.119 of 2008 got examined PWs.1 to 3. However, he did not enter into the w...
Smt. Gullapalli Vijayasree Vs. Rednam Satyavathi and 2 Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-28-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CRP No.5990;6140 o28. 03-2013 Smt. Gullapalli Vijayasree Rednam Satyavathi and 2 others Counsel for the petitioner:Sri P. Sri Raghu Ram Counsel for the respondents: M.S.R. Subrahmanyam HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED: C 1.COMMON ORDER: Both these revisions are between the same parties and against the same order, as such, they are being disposed of by this common order.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they arrayed in C.R.P. No.5990 of 2010.3. Respondents are owners of a building situated at a commercial locality i.e., Rednam Gardens, Vishakapatnam. Petitioner is their tenant. Respondents filed O.S. No.985 of 2003 in the Court of III Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), Vishakapatnam, for eviction of the petitioner and recovery of damages. The trial Court decreed the suit and determined the damages at the rate of Rs.21,000/- per month. Aggrieved by that, petitioner preferred A.S. No.224 of 2010 in the Cou...
Poranki Sridhar Raju and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh,panch ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Writ Petition No.25600 o26. 03-2013 Poranki Sridhar Raju and others Government of Andhra Pradesh,Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (Pts.III) Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad rep. by Special Chief Secretary to Government and others COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: Sri O. Manohar Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3.Sri D. Panduranga Redy, Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development ^COUNSEL FOR 4TH RESPONDENT: Sri D.V. Sitharama Murthy and Sri N. Ashwain Kumar : Head Note: CITATIONS:1. (1997) 1 Supreme Court Case2. AIR 199.Supreme Court 430(1) 3. 2004 (6) ALD 30.(DB) ORDER: Heard Sri O. Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri D. Panduranga Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development for respondents 1 to 3 and Sri D.V. Sitharama Murthy, learned senior counsel and Sri N. Ashwain Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.4.2. The petitioners challenge the proceedings of the 1st respondent in G....
M/S. Balaji Energy Private Limited Vs. Southern Power Distribution Com ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.3267 OF 201.26.03.2013 M/s. Balaji Energy Private Limited Southern Power Distribution Company Limited of Andhra Pradesh (APSPDCL) and others Counsel for the petitioner:Sri S. Ravi Standing Counsel for 1st respondent: Sri O. Manohar Reddy Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent : Sri P. Srinivasa Rao : : ?Citations: ORDER: Heard Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel for the writ petitioner, Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent, and Sri P.Srinivasa Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent. The writ petitioner sought for a direction to the 1st respondent to pay the electricity tariff to the petitioner in terms of the Power Purchase Agreement, dated 31.01.2005, and the guidelines issued by the Government of India and the State Government or in the alternative to permit them to sell the power by way of third party sale. The petitioner also desired that non-payment of electricity tariff in acc...
Tirupathi Subba Rao and 4 Others Vs. the Superintending Engineer Roads ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9712 o26. 03-2013 Tirupathi Subba Rao and 4 others The Superintending Engineer Roads and Buildings, Eluru, West Godavari District and 4 others. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Y.V.Srinivasan Counsel for Respondent Nos.1to 3: G.P. for Roads and Buildings Counsel for Respondent No.4: Sri G.Elisha, Standing Counsel for Grampanchayats Counsel for Respondent No.5: Sri K.Raj Kumar For Sri Ch.Dhanunjay, : ?Cases referred: The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is a vexatious piece of litigation indulged in by the petitioners even though in W.P.No.23755 of 2011 filed by Konithawada Gram Panchayat Sarpanch, respondent No.5, this Court has unequivocally ruled that the action of respondent Nos.1 to 4 in permitting Navuduru Gram Panchayat to construct a bus shelter in R.S.No.77 of Veeravasaram in front of the existing permanent bus shelter already constructed by respondent No.5 is patently arbitrary and illegal. The nar...
Kollu Malathi Vs. 1) Gaddam Nagarajakumar Reddy 2) Virupav
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-25-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR C.M.A.No.1012 o25. 03.2013 Kollu Malathi 1) Gaddam Nagarajakumar Reddy 2) Virupavajjula Ravindra Counsel for the appellant: Sri E.V.V.S. Ravi Kumar Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri V. Narayana Reddy : : ?Citations: JUDGMENT : (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice LNR,J) This appeal is filed against the order and decree passed by the Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, in H.M.O.P.No.106 of 1998. The 1st respondent in the O.P. is the appellant herein. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to, as arrayed in the O.P. The petitioner was a resident of Adhyakshamvari Street in Nellore. Opposite to his residence, the 1st respondent was residing together with her parents in the year 1989. The petitioner is said to have developed intimacy with the 1st respondent and that led to their marriage on 15-12-1991. However, the petitioner is said to have realized that the 1st respondent was married to the ...
Nesam Subbarao @ Subbayya,s/O. China Ram Vs. State, Rep.by Its Public ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-25-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU Second Appeal No.188 o25. 03-2013 Nesam Subbarao @ Subbayya,S/o. China Ramayya, Konda Kamma, 45 years,Supparipalem village, Rampachodavaram Mandal. State, rep.by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. Counsel for appellant/s: Sri G.Rama Gopal, Counsel for Respondent/s: Sri V.L.N.G.K.Murthy HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1. (2013)2 Supreme Court Case2. (2011)4 Supreme Court Case3. (2007)5 Supreme Court Case4. AIR 199.Andhra Prades5. (2003)8 Supreme Court Case6. AIR 200.Supreme Court 439 JUDGMENT: Unsuccessful defendants in both the courts below are the appellants herein. The plaintiff/first respondent filed the suit for declaration of title to the plaint schedule property, for possession of the same after evicting the defendants there from and for damages for unauthorized use and occupation of the same. According to the plaintiff, the plaint schedule property is part of Balayya Sastry layout. Plaint schedule consi...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »