Andhra Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Navata Road Transport Rep. by Its Manager and Another Vs. M/S Fortune ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order of the District Forum which has allowed the complaint directing the appellant to pay Rs.75,000/- towards cost of the consignment and Rs.25,000/- towards compensation and damages and also Rs.2,000/- towards costs. 2. The respondent booked a consignment consisting of 5 bags of Bt Cotton Deepti Bt2 seeds, each bag containing 20 packets totalling 100 packets worth Rs.75,000/- through the second appellant on 22.5.2009 to be delivered to its dealer Sri Sai Shakti Builder, Nakkarekal. The appellants failed to deliver the consignments to the dealer of the respondent. The consignment was not traced. 3. The respondent has contended that its dealer informed it that the consignment was not delivered and that the dealer would sustain an amount of Rs.25,000/- which should be set off by the respondent which the respondent said to have brought to the notice of the appellants that ...
Mandava Umamaheswara Rao and Others Vs. the Authorised Officer, Land R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5920 OF 200.15.03.2013 Mandava Umamaheswara Rao and others The Authorised Officer, Land Reforms Tribuna,and others Counsel for the petitioners : Sri K.Govardhan Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: Government Pleader for Arbitration Counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 7: Sri Yadagiri Reddy Mankala : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 198.SC 91.2. 1993 (1) APLJ 3 (SC) 3. Order dt.25.02.2013 in CRP 670.of 2003 and batch 4. 1995 Supp (2) SC5. (1996) 5 SCC 49.6. (1997) 6 SCC 27.7. 1995 (2) ALT 8.8. 1999 (4) ALD 11.9. 1999 (4) ALD 11.10. (2003) 9 SCC 52.11. (2005)10 SCC 60.12. 2009 (2) SCC 21.13. AIR 197.SC 19.ORDER: This Revision petition is filed u/s.21 of the A.P.Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (for short 'the Act') challenging the Order dt. 07.06.2003 in L.R.A.No.19 of 2001 of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal- cum-II Additional District Judge, Sangareddy at Medak confirming the Order dt.23.02.2...
Dadi Komuravva and Others Vs. Garshe Buchaiah and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A. No. 570 o15. 03.2013 Dadi Komuravva and others Garshe Buchaiah and others Counsel for the Appellants: Sri Kota subba Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Nisaruddin Ahmed Jeddy Sri V. Sambasiva Rao Sri I. Naveen Kumar : : ?Cases Referred:1. 2004(5) ALT 32.2. 2008(3) ALD 80(DB) 3. 2005 ACJ 58.4. 2009 ACJ 18.5. 2011(4) ALD 33.6. 2005 ACJ 54.7. 2001 ACJ 42.8. 2000 ACJ 107.9. (2009) 6 SCC 12.Judgment: The claimants before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (I Additional District Judge), at Karimnagar, challenging the dismissal order, dated 21.02.2003, passed in OP No. 361 of 1998, filed this appeal. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the Tribunal for the sake of convenience. The first claimant is the wife of late Dadi Odelu and the second claimant is their daughter and the third claimant is the adoptive father of late Dadi Odelu. On 23.02.1995 at about 11.30 AM the deceased and others were proceeding ...
Kondaveeti Srinivasa Rao Vs. the Government of A.P., Co-operation Dep
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6755 o15. 03.2013 Kondaveeti Srinivasa Rao The Government of A.P., Co-Operation Department, Hyderabad, Reptd by its Secretary and seven others. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.Chidambaram Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP for Co-Operation Counsel for Respondent Nos.6 & 7: Smt Bobba Vijaya Lakshmi Counsel for Respondent No.8: Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva : ?CITATIONS: The Court made the following: ORDER: The dispute mainly pertains to preparation of voters' list in respect of Penugonda Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Society, West Godavari District (for short 'the Society'). Earlier, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No.2114 of 2013 for declaring the action of respondent No.2 in not taking further steps for holding elections to the Society as illegal and arbitrary. The said Writ Petition was disposed of by this Court by order, dated 01.02.2013, wherein it was recorded that it is submitted by the learned Government Plead...
The Divisional Manager, the National Insurance Co.Ltd., MaIn Road, Aru ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The District Forum allowed the complaint against the appellant insurance company on the premise that claim for coronary artery surgery limited to 20% of the sum assured and the amount is in addition to the compensation contemplated in the insurance policy and that the appellant having paid part of the claim cannot bank on delay clause of the insurance policy. 2. The respondent obtained Varsihata Mediclaim Policy bearing number 550500/42/09/2500000145 from the appellant-insurance company on 5.10.2009 for a period of one year commencing from 9.10.2009 to midnight of 8.10.2009 by paying premium of Rs.16,649/-. The insurance policy is renewal of the earlier insurance policy issued for hospitalization and domiciliary hospitalization benefits such as medical sum insured and critical sum insured. 3. The respondent claimed critical sum insured for the heart surgery he had undergone at Star Hospital, Hyderabad...
Smt.Shamshu Begum Vs. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 5220 OF 201.14-03-2013 Smt.Shamshu Begum Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,Having its office at Municipal Complex, Lower Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad rep. By its Commissioner and another Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Mohd.Zia-ul-Haque Counsel for the Respondents: Dr.Smt.Y.Padmavathi, Standing Counsel : ?CITATIONS: ORDER: This writ petition is instituted seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring the action of the respondent - Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) in pressurizing the petitioner to hand over her immoveable property bearing Municipal No. 8-1-168, admeasuring 75 sq yards adjacent to TB Hospital, Erragadda, Hyderabad, as illegal and consequently to refrain the respondents from dispossessing the petitioner from the said property without following the due process of law. The petitioner claims that she is the owner of property bearing Municipal No. 8-1-168 admeasuring 75 sq yards adjacent to Chest Hospi...
Mahender Singh Vs. Union of India,rep. by Deputy Inspector
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 7231 o14. 03.2013 Mahender Singh Union of India,rep. by Deputy Inspector General/DAE,Central Industrial Security Force, Hyderabad & others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri J.M. Naidu Counsel for the respondents: Sri A. Samir Kumar Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: This Writ Petition is instituted by a Head Constable working with the Central Industrial Security Force (henceforth referred to as 'CISF' for brevity), challenging the legality and validity of the order dated 31.05.2012 passed by the Assistant Commandant, CISF Unit, Manugur, imposing on him the punishment of withholding one increment for a period of one year with non- cumulative effect. The appeal preferred by the petitioner there against was rejected by the Commandant, by his order, dated 18.08.2012 and the further revision preferred there against has also been turned down by the Deputy Inspector General of CISF, Hyderabad, by his order dated 31.12.2012. At the ...
The Bar Association, Junior Civil Judge' Vs. the Govt.of A.P. rep.,by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.4575 o14. 03.2013 The Bar Association, Junior Civil Judge's Court, Alampur rep., by its President Sri H. Shanthi Mallappa, aged:63. years, R/o Vaddepally Village & Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. The Govt.of A.P. rep.,by its Secretary,Legislative Affairs &Justice Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Cherukuri Yadagiri. Counsel for respondents 1 & 2: G.P. for Home Counsel for respondent No.3 &4: Sri Y. Rama Rao (SC for APHC) Counsel for respondent No.5: Sri J.U.M.V. Prasad HEAD NOTE: ?Citations:1. AIR 196.SC 194.2) AIR 195.SC 54.3) AIR 196.SC 191.4) (1987) 4 SCC 73.5) (1979) 3 SCR 101.6) (1983) 4 SCC 58.7) AIR 197.SC 98.8) AIR 197.SC 133.9) (2009) 13 SCC 75.10) (2008) 7 SCC 63.11) (2013) 2 SCC 17.12) (2007) 9 SCC 58.13) AIR 197.Madra14. (1951) 342 US 9.15) (2003) 4 SCC 57.16) (1988) 4 SCC 5.17) (1977) 1 SCC 13.18) (1996) 2 Crime19. AIR 200.Bom.431 20) (1993) 3 SCC 55...
E.V. Ranga Reddy. Vs. Union of India Rep. by Its Deputy Secret
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.27956 o14. 03-2013 E.V. Ranga Reddy. Union of India rep. by its Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Mines, New Delhi and others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri E. Manohar, Sr. Counsel Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, for R-1 G.P for Mines and Geology Sri Venkat Reddy Donthi Reddy, for R-5 HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred 1)(2009) 17 SCC 67.2)(1859) 7 MIA 28.3)AIR 196.SC 94.4)(2011) 11 SCC 67.5)1988 (Supp) SCC 78.6)AIR 198.SC 89.ORDER: The petitioner submitted an application for grant of mining lease to quarry iron ore and laterite over an extent of 500 acres of land in survey No.172 of Pagadalapalli Village, Pendlimarri Mandal, Kadapa District, before the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, the 4th respondent herein. The application was forwarded to the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the 2nd respondent, recommending grant of mining lease, over an extent of about 500 acres. The 2nd respondent, in turn, submitted p...
Ramakrishna Food Industry, Represented B Vs. the Government of Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.4940 o14. 3-2013 Ramakrishna Food Industry, Represented by its Proprietor Metpally Krishna Rao, Mancheriyal, Adilabad District The Government of Andhra Pradesh,Represented by its Principal Secretary, Labour Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad and 2 others HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner : Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy Counsel for respondents : None appeared ?CASES REFERRED: Nil The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a certiorari to quash order dated 5-11- 2012 in I.A.No.1/2012 in W.C.No.1/2012 on the file of respondent No.2. As the order proposed to be passed by this Court will not affect the interests of respondent No.3 in any manner, it is not necessary to serve notice on him. I have heard Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. Respondent No.3 is the employee of the petitioner. He has approached respondent No.2 by filing W.C.No.1/2012 claiming compensation for the injuries...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »