Andhra Pradesh Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madala Subba Rao and 14 Others. Vs. the Government of A.P., Reptd by I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.14317;22079 o19. 12.2012 Madala Subba Rao and 14 others. The Government of A.P., Reptd by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Department, Hyderabad and 17 others Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati Counsel for Respondents 1 to 4: AGP for Land Acquisition Counsel for Respondents 5 to 8: AGP for Irrigation & CAD Counsel for Respondents 9 to 18: Sri K.Ananda Rao W.P.No.22079 of 2012 Between: Nidamanuri Siddulu ..... Petitioner And: The Government of A.P., Reptd by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Department, Hyderabad and 20 others. And another......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati Counsel for Respondents 1 to 4: AGP for Land Acquisition Counsel for Respondents 5 to 8: AGP for Irrigation & CAD Counsel for Respondents 9 to 18: Sri K.Ananda Rao Gist: Head Note: ?CITATIONS: NIL ORDER: These two Writ Petitions are filed feeling agg...
M.S.Chinna Krishnaswamy Vs. the Regional Transport Authority, Chitto
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 37596 o19. 12.2012 M.S.Chinna Krishnaswamy The Regional Transport Authority, Chittoor and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri T.Venkataramana Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: Assistant Government Pleader for Transport Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri K.Srinivas : : ?Cases referred: ORDER: The petitioner submitted an application in the year 2003, before the Regional Transport Authority, Chittoor - the first respondent herein, with a request to grant pucca stage carriage permit for town service route from Mahaveer Talkies, Tirupathi to Seshachala Hill View Colony. The first respondent rejected the application through order dated 04.09.2006, observing that the proposed route is a new one and that the same has not been formulated as provided for under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') and the Rules framed thereunder. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the first respondent, the petitioner filed an appeal - A....
Donthy Reddy Atchyutha Reddy, S/O.Bucha Vs. N.Ratnan Babu, S/O.Venkaia ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6172 o19. 12.2012 Donthy Reddy Atchyutha Reddy, S/o.Bucha Reddy N.Ratnan Babu, S/o.Venkaiah Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. Raja Gopallavan Tayi Counsel for the Respondent: Mr.N.Ratan Babu : : ?Cases referred: CRP No.4752 of 2011, dated 28.11.2011 (High Court of A.P.) ORDER: This civil revision is filed against docket order dated 03.10.2012 in E.P. No.56 of 2012 in O.S.No.218 of 2006 (E.P) on the file of the Court of II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The petitioner herein is the Judgment Debtor (J.Dr) and the respondent herein is the Decree Holder (D.Hr) in the E.P. For convenience sake, I refer the parties as they are arrayed in the E.P. The E.P. was filed by the D.Hr under Order XXI Rules 37 and 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to arrest and detain the J.Dr in civil prison for non-payment of amount of Rs.5,75,274/-. During the course of the proceedings in the E.P., the Court bel...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,rep. by Vs. Kottala Santhaiah and Two ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M. A. No.3318 OF 200.19.12.2012 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,rep. by its branch Manager, Opp. S.B.H., Habsiguda,Hyderabad. Kottala Santhaiah and two others Counsel for the Appellant:Sri V.Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Sri G.Arun Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:-Nil- JUDGMENT: This C.M.A. has been filed by the New India Assurance Company Limited assailing the order dated 31.01.2004 in W.C. No.35 of 2003 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Hyderabad (for short 'the Commissioner') whereby and where-under the applicants - claimants were awarded an amount of Rs.2,21,674/- towards compensation as against the claim of Rs.5,00,000/-.2. The parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the W.C.3. The brief facts of the case of the applicants are that their son was working as Cleaner on Eicher van bearing No. AP 1.U-8384 belonging to opposite Party No.1 on monthly wages o...
M/S. Krishna 70 Mm theatre, Rep. by Its Vs. the State of Andhra Prades ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14468 OF 201.19-12-2012 M/s. Krishna 70 MM Theatre, Rep. by its Proprietor J.Satyanarayana S/o. J.Ramulu and another The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue) Secretariat, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri M.S. Prasad,representing Sri V. Lakshman Rao. Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Advocate General. ^Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : Sri C. Narender. : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 198.SC 108.2. AIR 196.Supreme Cour3. 1965 (1) AWR 36.WRIT PETITION No.14468 OF 201.ORDER: The petitioners are proprietary concerns and Cinema Theatres at Miyapur. The Tahsildar, Sherlingampalli Mandal - 3rd respondent, issued a show-cause notice under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act (for short 'Land Encroachment Act') on 10-09-2010 alleging that the petitioners constructed a building covering the Full Tank Level (FTL) of an irrigation tank and a Nala to an extent of Ac.0.04 guntas of land in Survey ...
Syed Mohammed Fazalul Vs. Mrs. Sameena Zahra Kato
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.30052 OF 201.19.12.2012 Syed Mohammed Fazalullah...Petitioner Mrs. Sameena Zahra Katoon... Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri M.V.S. Suresh Kumar Counsel for respondent: Sri A. Mahadev HEAD NOTE: ?Cases cited:1. (2002) 3 SCC 25.2 2005 (2) ALD 67.(FB) ORDER: (Per G. Rohini, J) The respondent herein filed LGC No.15 of 2012 in the Special Court constituted under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 (for short, 'the Act') against the writ petitioner alleging that he had illegally occupied the Application Schedule Property i.e., premises No.8-2-674/B/2/14 admeasuring 360 sq. yards equivalent to 302.40 sq. mts. situated at Road No.13, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, with an intention to illegally grab the same and thus seeking eviction of the writ petitioner from the said property. After hearing both the parties, the Special Court has taken cognizance of the LGC under Section 8 (1) of t...
A.V.V.S.N. Murthy Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,rep. by
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.23528 o18. 12-2012 A.V.V.S.N. Murthy The Government of Andhra Pradesh,rep. by its Principal Secretary and others Counsel for the petitioner: Sri G. Vidyasagar Counsel for respondents : Advocate General : Citations:1. AIR 197.SC 120.2) 1998 (3) An.W.R....
Dr.Aruna Kumari Vs. the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.31125 o17. 12.2012 Dr.Aruna Kumari The Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, rep.by its Chairman & Managing Director, regd.office at Bharat Bhavan, 4 & 6 Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai 001. and others ^Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri N.Ashwani Kumar !Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: Sri O.Manohar Reddy Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri P.Gangaiah Naidu for Sri K.Gopal Head note: ?Cases referred: The Court made the following: ORDER: The short issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether the action of respondent No.2, who has reduced the marks allotted to the petitioner in respect of godown and show room, suffers from any illegality or arbitrariness. The facts, which are not in dispute, are that the petitioner applied to respondent No.1-Corporation in pursuance of the advertisement issued by it for appointment as LPG dealer for Nandyal Town. Respondent Nos.3 to 5 and various others ha...
Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certification Vs. the Chief Commissioner of ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.No.31640 o17. 12.2012 Andhra Pradesh State Seed Certification Agency, Hyderabad The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Hyderabad and two others Senior Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A.V.Krishna Koundinya Standing Counsel for Respondents: Sri J.V.Prasad HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1 M/s.New Noble Education Society Vs. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-I 2 (2011) 336 ITR 64.AP 3 (2012) 347 ITR 8.4 (2012) 347 ITR 9.5 2011 (42) VST 36.(SC) 6 (2010) 329 ITR 40.(Kerala) 7 (2005) 4 S.C.C8. (1996) 1 S.C.C9. (1976) 105 ITR 9.(SC) 10 (1994) Supp (3) S.C.C11. IR 195.SC 36.ORDER (per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao) The petitioner herein challenges the order dated 31-03-2011 of the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad-III (1st respondent), rejecting the application dated 22-03-2010 filed for approval under Section 10 (23) (C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act") for th...
P.Srinivasa Rao, Achampet Village and Ma Vs. the Executive Engineer, P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.37789 OF 201.17-12-2012 P.Srinivasa Rao, Achampet Village and Mandal, Guntur District and one another The Executive Engineer, P.R.I. Division, Vijayawada, Krishna District and one another Counsel for the petitioner: M/s. P.Prabhakara Rao Counsel for the respondents: GP for Panchayat Raj : ?Citations: ORDER: This writ petition is instituted by two petitioners, essentially challenging the validity of the action of the respondents in not returning the earnest money deposit paid by them at the time of participating at the public auctions for grant of license to operate the ferry across Krishna River for a period of one year during 2012-13. The case of the petitioners is that the first respondent Executive Engineer floated a tender notice inviting bids for grant of a license for operating a ferry across River Krishna between Ramanapeta village situate at Chandarlapadu Mandal of Krishna district to Putlagudem on the other side of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »