Andhra Pradesh Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gangula Kiran Babu Vs. Smt. Nookala Madhavi Latha
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.4345 o12. 12-2012 Gangula Kiran Babu Smt. Nookala Madhavi Latha Counsel for the appellant: Sri C.Upendra Counsel for the respondent: Sri V.V.N.Narasimham : ?Cases referred: Nil. Judgment: (per K.G.Shankar, J.) The appellant resisted the petition laid by the respondent under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking for the restitution of the conjugal rights. The husband contended that there was no jural relationship of husband and wife between him and the respondent. The trial court held that the appellant is the husband of the respondent and granted decree for restitution of conjugal rights. Assailing the same, the present appeal is laid.2. The appellant and the respondent were contemporaries in the college. Both of them were students of BITS, a private Engineering College at MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam. They thus knew each other.3. The case of the respondent is: (a) The appellant ...
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda Vs. A.P. State Wakf Board, Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.35115 o12. 12.2012 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda A.P. State Wakf Board, represented by its Chief Executive Officer, Hyderabad and others. Counsel for petitioner: GP for Land Acquisition Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sri Mir Masood Khan Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri G.Ashok Kumar Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Sri Nazir Ahmed Khan Counsel for Respondent No.4 : Sri S.Srinivasa Varma HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1. (1996) 7 SCC 21.2. AIR 198.AP 20.3. AIR 197.SC 209.4. AIR 197.SC 56.5. AIR 197.SC 16.6. (2003) 6 SCC 67.7. (1997) 3 SCC 26.8. 2010 (7) Suprem9. 2002 (1) ALD 6.(DB) ORDER: This writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 06.06.2012 passed by the A.P. Wakf Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short 'the Tribunal') in I.A.No.376 of 2011 in O.S.No.80 of 2011. The facts that gave rise to filing of the writ petition are as under: The Central Government has taken up the work of widening National Highway No.9, betwee...
K.Rama Chandra Murthy and another Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.2323 OF 201.12-12-2012 K.Rama Chandra Murthy and another State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by it's Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri N.Vidya Prasad Counsel for the Respondents: R1: I.Koti Reddy R2: Public Prosecutor : :1998. 1) ALD (Crl.) 126 (AP) (2001)7 Supreme Court Cases 401 (2005) 4 Supreme Court Cases 173 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order dated 29-10-2012 passed in C.C.No.73 of 2007 on the file of the Ju 2. The petitioners are A-1 and A-2 in C.C.No.73 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Podili and they a 3. Heard Sri N.Vidya Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/A-1 and A-2 and learned Additional Public Prosecut 4. Sri N.Vidya Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners contends that since the petitioners are being represente "(17) Thus, in appropriate cases the magistrate can allow...
M/S. V.G. Mutually Aided Co-operative Society Ltd. and Another Vs. K. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant, and having perused the material on record, we are of the opinion that this matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission. 2) The opposite party society while preferring the appeal against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay Rs. 2,48,410/- with interest @ 15% p.a., from the date of complaint till the date of realization together compensation of Rs. 10,000/- and costs of Rs. 2,000/- filed the above application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone delay of 623 days. It was alleged that copy of order of the Dist. Forum was received on 7.3.2012 and that he could not contact his counsel in time due to cardiac problem, and that he took treatment in a private hospital. Subsequently, he came to learn that the society is in turmoil as the other partners left away without maintaining any records and as such huge loss occurred and money was kept in real esta...
Gaddam Lingaiah Vs. the District Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa D
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.38148 o11. 12-2012 Gaddam Lingaiah The District Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa District and others Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. D. Seshasayana Reddy Counsel for Respondents: AGP for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS: ORDER: The overjealous attitude of the Revenue and Stamps and Registration officials has been time and again driving the citizens to take recourse to the remedy of judicial review. This case is a paradigm where the property, which was shown as a private property in the extract of Register of Holding, is treated as Government land and the request of the petitioner for its registration was rejected by the registering authority-respondent No.5, which was confirmed by the appellate authority-respondent No.4. One Guduru Rachaiah is stated to be the absolute owner, possessor and pattadar of agricultural lands admeasuring Ac.4.84 cents in Sy.No.147/2 of Pedda Rangapuram Village, Pulivendla Mandal, Kadapa District. It is the pl...
M/S.Pbr Select Infra Projects Plot No.22 Vs. the Commissioner of Tende ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE Writ Appeal 1368 o11. 12-2012 M/S.PBR SELECT INFRA PROJECTS PLOT NO.22, 3RD FLOOR,SELECT HOUSE, NAGARJUNA HILLS,PUNJAGUTTA,HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS PARTNER MR.P.BHASKAR REDDY THE COMMISSIONER OF TENDERS BRK BHAVAN,HYDERABAD AND OTHERS Counsel for the appellant: SRI PARSA ANANTH NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the respondents 1 & 2: GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR IRRIGATION Counsel for respondent No.3 : SRI.V.PRASAD RAO : CITATIONS:1. 2008(1) ALT 71.2. 1995(5) ALT 4.3. (1994) 6 SCC 65.JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice) This Writ Appeal by the appellant-writ petitioner is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16.10.2012 in W.P.No.19517 of 2012 dismissing the writ petition filed by him to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not disqualifying the 3rd respondent for the breach of conditions of tender Document IFB.No.09/RBLISP/2011-12 dated 24.3.2012 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to dire...
B. Krishna Mohan Reddy Vs. the District Collector, Mahabubnagar Dis
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22855 o11. 12-2012 B. Krishna Mohan Reddy The District Collector, Mahabubnagar District and others Counsel for the petitioner: Smt. P. Lakshmi Counsel for respondents : G.P. for Revenue for RRs 1 to 3 : Citations: ORDER: The A.P. Land Revenue Act had certain provisions, which have the effect of regulating the land use and other relate matters. It was not at all possible for conversion of an agricultural land into other uses. A detailed exercise was required to be undertaken. Similar provisions were contained in other enactments also. However, the A.P. Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non- Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act') was enacted by the State Legislature enabling the conversion of agricultural lands for non-agricultural purposes. Taking advantage of certain lacunae in that Act, conversions are being resorted to and the result is that large extents of land that too mostly abutting the high ways ceased t...
The New India Assurance Co., Ltd., Rep., by Its Branch Manager Vs. K. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. 2. The facts of the case as seen from the complaint are that the complainant is the owner of the lorry bearing No.AP 16 TU-4012 and it was insured with the opposite party on 24-11-2008 for a period of one year i.e., upto 23-11-2009. On 28.10.2009 the complainants vehicle met with an accident and it was badly damaged. The complainant informed the same to the opposite party and the opposite party appointed an authorized surveyor to estimate the loss. The surveyor submitted his report to the opposite party. Later, with the permission of the opposite party the complainant got repaired the damaged vehicle by spending a sum of `2,50,000/-. Subsequently another surveyor estimated the loss. The complainant submitted a claim form for a sum of `2,50,000/- along with relevant bills and vouchers. On receipt of the said claim the opposite party sent a letter dated 22-02-2010 stating that the driver of t...
Smt Parvathi Sirisha N Vs. Yashoda Hospital, Rep. by Its Director and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complaint is filed seeking direction to the opposite parties to pay a sum of `40 lakh with interest towards medical expenses and treatment, `5 lakh with interest towards compensation for mental agony and `25,000/- towards costs 2. The averments of the complaint are that on 11.3.2008 she was admitted in the opposite party no.1 hospital for treatment of gum bleeding and she was treated for a period for 22 days and blood was transfused to her where after her condition was further deteriorated. After her condition become normal, she was discharged on 2.4.2008 and the complainant incurred an amount of `1,90,000/- towards medial expenditure. On 18.7.2008 she was again admitted as inpatient in the opposite party no.1 hospital and during the time of her admission for the first time she was treated by the opposite parties no.4 to 6 and when she was admitted for the second time the opposite parties no.4 and 6 administered treatment t...
M/S.Kapil Chit Fund (P) Ltd. Vs. Smt. P. Usha and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-10-2012
Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.370/2009 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad opposite party No.1 preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant joined as a Member of opposite party No.1 chit series on 01-4-2004 for a value of Rs.1,00,000/- and the monthly subscription is Rs.4,000/-. The complainant submitted that opposite party No.1 represented by opposite party No.2, the then Manager informed the complainant that she was the successful bidder in the auction held in May, 2005 and had got the chit value of Rs.80,000/- and Rs.15,000/- was the dividend and the balance of Rs.5,000/- was paid towards company commission. The complainant submitted that as she was unable to produce the required sureties for release of bid amount, the then Branch Manager of opposite party No.2 advised her to keep the prized amount of Rs.80,000/- in a fixed deposit and the interest accrued on the fixed deposit be adjusted towar...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »