Andhra Pradesh Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
J.Chinna Nageswara Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-26-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10388 o26. 12-2012 J.Chinna Nageswara Rao The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. N. Shoba Counsel for Respondents: G.P. for Mines & Geology : ?Citations: ORDER: This writ petition demonstrates the tactics adopted by a section of sand mafia in the State to defraud the State and public at large. Petitioner No.1 is a Contractor, undertaking the activity of supplying sand. The Assistant Director of Mines & Geology, Nandigama, Krishna District, respondent No.5 herein, issued a notification, dated 22.03.2011, inviting tenders for grant of lease to quarry sand in Krishna River at Ganiatkuru Village, Kanchikacherla Mandal, Krishna District. The Geo-Coordinates were indicated. The minimum bid amount for one year was mentioned as Rs.2 crores. The auction was scheduled to take place on 13.04.2011. Petitioner No.1 purchased the tender schedules. Soon thereafter, he addressed a letter, dated 06....
The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Munagada Chinni Kumar and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-26-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A. No.1625 OF 201.26.12.2012 The New India Assurance Company Limited Munagada Chinni Kumar and others Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Naresh Byrapaneni Counsel for respondents: Sri K.L.N. Rao : : ?Citations: JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by the Insurance Company aggrieved by the award dated 09.03.2010 in M.V.O.P.No.1643 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows : On 23.05.2006, the minor claimant, by name Munagada Chinni Kumari, a student, along with her relatives, boarded an auto bearing not AP 31.926 at Ratnalapalem Village to proceed towards Narsipatnam. When the auto reached Narsipatnam, the driver of the said auto drove it in a rash and negligent manner at high speed. Consequently, the auto turned turtle at R&B Bungalow and due to the impact, the claimant sustained injury and one child died on the spot. On a...
Rachakonda Nagaiah Vs. the Govt. of A.P. Rep., by the District
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-26-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.38104 o26. 12.2012 Rachakonda Nagaiah The Govt. of A.P. rep., by the District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District and three others. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Palivela Satyarajababu Counsel for respondents: G.P. for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?Citations:1. Judgment in W.P. No.13350 of 2005 dated 10.03.2006 2) 2009(1) ALD (NOC3. (1996) 6 SCC 4.4) (2006) 1 SCC 27.5) (2005) 6 SCC 40.6) AIR 196.SC 64.7) (1901) AC 49.8) (2002) 4 SCC 63.9) (1941) 2 All ER 1.10) AIR 196.SC 8.11) (1989)1 SCC 10.12) AIR 196.SC 148.13) (1991) 4 SCC 13.14) (2009) 6 SCC 37.15) (2004) 13 SCC 21.16) (1974) 3 SCC 22.17) (1976)1 SCC 67.18) (1977) 1 SCC 48.19) AIR 196.SC 121.20) AIR 196.SC 33.21) AIR 197.SC 96.22) (1977) 4 SCC 14.23 (1998) 9 SCC 41.ORDER: The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, in not conducting a survey of his land admeasuring Ac.0.20 guntas in Sy.No.179 of Gudivada Village, Kethepally Mandal, Nalgon...
Bodela Siva Bhaskar Reddy and Other Vs. the Government of Andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-26-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.39351 o26. 12-2012 Bodela Siva Bhaskar Reddy and others.... Petitioners The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad and others... Respondents Counsel for Petitioners: Sri Venkatesh Kodumury Counsel for Respondents 1 to 4: G.P. for Land Acquisition Counsel for Respondents 5 to 16: Mr. G. Ramachandra Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 2 and 3 in passing award in respect of H.not NS-435 in Sy.No.127/1 to 9 and H.Nos.NS-437 to NS-448 in an extent of Ac.2.19 cents comprised in Sy.No.127/15 and 16 of Obannapeta fields, R.S. Kondapuram Mandal, Kadapa District, without referring the dispute to the civil court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Mr. Venkatesh Kodumury, learned counsel for the pe...
Pitchika Lakshmi Vs. State of Andhra Pradaesh, rep. by It's P
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-24-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.1119 o24. 12.2012 Pitchika Lakshmi State of Andhra Pradaesh, rep. by it's Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. HEAD NOTE: Counsel for Petitioner : Sri Saibaba Itapu Counsel for Respondent No.1: G.Rama Gopal Counsel for Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor Cases referred 2009 Cri.L.J 92.AIR 200.(DOC) 211 (KER.) (DB) 2005(4) Suprem2004. Cri.L.J 128.ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 13-6-2011 passed in Crl.M.P.No.769 of 2010 in M.C.No.193 of 2003 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. 2. The petitioners are wife and daughter of the 1st respondent. They filed M.C.No.193 of 2003 claiming maintenance. The said M.C came to be allowed on 25- 11-2005 granting maintenance to them at the rate of Rs.2,500/- per month each. Aggrieved by the order, the 1st respondent filed Criminal Revision Case No.2091 of 2005. The revision came to be disposed on 20-...
M/S.Jairaj Ispat Limited, Hyderabad,rep. Vs. the Central Power Distrib ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.31961 o31962. 31978, 31984, 32082, 32083, 32099, 32100, 32126, 32299, 32336, 34913, 34925, 34938, 34944, 35016, 35173, 35270, 35316, 35421, 36340 and 36353 o21. 12.2012 M/s.Jairaj Ispat Limited, Hyderabad,rep. by its Managing Director & others......Petitioners The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd.,Hyderabad & others.....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: M/s.D.V.Nagarjuna Babu & others. Counsel for the Respondents: Sri O.Manohar Reddy, Standing Counsel for APCPDCL & Sri Srinivasa Rao Putluri, Standing Counsel for Electricity Regulatory Commission. : ?CITATIONS: Nil COMMON ORDER : As common questions of law are involved on similar set of facts, all these writ petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. For the purpose of disposal, I refer to the facts as arise in W.P.No.31962 of 2012. The writ petition in W.P.No.31962 of 2012 is filed seeking directions by way of M...
National Investigation Agency Chikoti Ga Vs. Mohmed Anwar Shak and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 824 o21. 12-2012. National Investigation Agency Chikoti Garden, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Rep. by I.R.S. Murthy, Addl. Superintendent of Police, NIA,Hyderabad. Mohmed Anwar Shak and another. For the petitioner: Mr. P. Vishnu Vardhan Reddy For the Respondents: Mr. Mohd. Muzafer Ullah Khan : CITATIONS:1. (2003) 8 SCC 5.2. 2009 (3) GLT 85.3. (2010) 4 GL4. Criminal Appeal No.29 of 2011 dt. 27.07.2011 5. Crl.A.No.2225 of 2010 dt. 23.10.2010 Judgment: (Per Justice Sri. N.V. Ramana) This criminal appeal by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), is directed against the order dated 13.07.2012, passed by the IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in M.P. No. 353 of 2012 in Crime No.1/2012 of NIA, granting bail to the respondents- accused Nos. 3 and 4. The facts of the case in brief are on credible information that one Morjen Hossain of Mohabatpur village, Kaliachak PS limits, Malda D...
Ande Narasimha Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,rep. by Its Comm
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.38504 o21. 12.2012 Ande Narasimha Rao State of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by its Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration & Stamps,Hyderabad and 5 others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri N.Siva Reddy Counsel for the respondents: GP for Revenue : : ?Cases referred: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.3 and 6, in not receiving the document sought to be presented by the petitioner for registration in respect of Acs.5-00 of land in Survey No.356/2 of Desapatrunipalem Village, Parawada Mandal, in Visakhapatnam District, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner is an ex-serviceman, who was granted a DKT patta in respect of the abovementioned land. On 25-01-1993, when the petitioner sought to sell the said land and presented sale deed for registration, respondent No.6 refused to receive the same on the ground that the same is covered by a DKT patta containing prohibition o...
Shaik Mowlali Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by Pu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 52 o21. 12-2012 Shaik Mowlali The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Counsel for Petitioner: Shri C. Padmanabha Reddy, Senior Counsel assisted by Smt. C. Sangeetha Reddy Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1) 2004 (2) ALT (Crl2. 2009 (1) ALD (Crl) 515 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 52 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per Justice N.V. Ramana) This appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence passed in S.C. No. 83 of 2007 by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur on 05-12-2008. The appellant herein is accused No.1 and he was prosecuted for the offence under Section 302 IPC. He along with accused Nos.2 and 3 was also prosecuted for the offence under Section 498-A IPC. According to the prosecution, about five years prior to the date of incident, the marriage of the deceased was performed with accused No.1. Acc...
Are Siva Parvathi and Another Vs. State of A.P.,rep.by Its Public Pros ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.902 o21. 12-2012 Are Siva Parvathi and another State of A.P.,Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, Hyderabad and another Counsel for the petitioners : Sri Naga Praveena Vankayalapti Counsel for the respondent No.1 : Public Prosecutror Counsel for the respondent No.2: Sri G.Nageswara Rao : ?CITATIONS:1. 1998(1) ALT (Crl.) 199 (A.P.) = 1998(2) ALD 61.2 1995(4) Supp (4) S.C.C. 243 ORDER: The petition is directed against the Judgment dated 15.03.2012 passed in C.R.P.No.42 of 2011 on the file of V Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Ongole, whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge modified the Order of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chirala with regard to the effective date of commencement of enhanced maintenance in M.C.No.20 of 2010. The petitioners are the wife and the son of the 2nd respondent. The wife and the son filed M.C.No.20 of 2010 under Section 127(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure (for sho...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »