Andhra Pradesh Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravipati Subba Ra Vs. the District Collector and Magistrate and
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition Nos.8063 o17. 12.2012 Ravipati Subba Rao.....Petitioner The District Collector & Magistrate and others.....Respondents Writ Petition No.8542 of 2012 B.V.Raghavaiah and others....Petitioners The District Collector &Magistrate and others.....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Kurra Srinivas Counsel for respondents 1, 2 & 4: G.P. for Land Acquisition Counsel for respondent No.3: G.P. for Mines and Geology Counsel for respondent No.5: G.P. for Irrigation Counsel for respondent Nos.6 & 7: Smt. not Shoba HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred: COMMON ORDER: The petitioners own different extent of land, in all about Acs.18.00 in Yerrabalem Village, Prakasam District. The land was acquired by the Government in the year 2006 as submergence area of Gundlakamma Reservoir. Compensation was paid and possession of land was taken. The petitioners submit that though possession of the land was taken, it was being put to use for raisi...
N.Krishna Rao Vs. Shaik Basheer Ahmed
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU SECOND APPEAL No.1265 o17. 12-2012 N.Krishna Rao Shaik Basheer Ahmed Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Srinivas Dammalapati Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Damodar Mundra : : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 198.Karnataka 221 JUDGMENT: The plaintiff who lost his suit in both the Courts below, filed this second appeal. He filed the suit in the trial Court for declaration of his ownership to the plaint schedule property, for possession of the same by removing structures raised by the defendant therein and for mandatory injunction for demolition of illegal structures therein. The plaint schedule property consists of 1000 Sq. yards of site in S.No.101/E of Katedan Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Rangareddy District. The defendant constructed six mulgis with old D.No.4-92/22 and present municipal Door Nos.6-3-197, 6-3-197/1 to 6. It is the plaintiff's case that he is owner of Ac.4-20 guntas in S.No.101 having purchased the same from his vendors S.Rami...
M/S. Kapil Chit Funds Pvt Ltd., Rep. by Tis Branch Manager Vs. B.K. Ud ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
Oral Order: Mrs. M. Shreesha, Member: 1. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant, and having perused the material on record, we are of the opinion that the matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission. 2. The opposite party while preferring the appeal against the order of the District Forum dated 22.11.2011 filed the appeal along with this application to condone the delay of 367 days. 3. The petitioner is a chit fund company and has filed this petition to condone a delay 367 days in filing the appeal on the ground that its counsel did not intimate passing of orders in the complaint. Later when the concerned officer resumed duty, he came to know about the passing of orders and accordingly brought all relevant papers from the counsel and sent to the Central Office at Secunderabad and as such a delay of 367 days was ensued in filing the appeal. The delay was neither wilful nor wanton. Therefore he prayed that the delay be condoned. 4. In the light of the fact that delay ...
Vanama Srinivasa Rao, S/O. Sriram Setty, Vs. 1. State of A.P., Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-14-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1853 OF 200.14.12.2012. Vanama Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Sriram Setty, aged 29 years, Prop. Raghava Enamel Slate Industries, Markapur, Prakasam District. 1. State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor and another Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana Counsel for Respondents: Public Prosecutor, Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela HEAD NOTE: Cases referred (1) (2007) 6 Supreme Court Cases 555 (2) (2008) 8 Supreme Court Cases 529 JUDGMENT: This appeal at the instance of the complainant is directed against the acquittal of the accused in C.C.No.126 of 1999 by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Markapur on 10.01.2005. The appellant herein is the complainant and he has filed the complaint for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short "the N.I. Act") against the respondent No.2 herein. According to the appellant - complainant, he is a business man in slates and Proprietor of Raghava Ena...
Siragam Narayana Reddy (Died) Per L.R. a Vs. Siragam Pedda Gangappa an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-14-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR A.S.No.1867 o14. 12.2012 Siragam Narayana Reddy (died) per L.R. and 7 others. Siragam Pedda Gangappa and 32 others Counsel for the Appellants: Sri O. Manohar Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Smt. T.V. Sridevi : Cases referred:1. AIR 198.SC 87.2. AIR 195.Patna 398 (V 4.C 11.Aug.) 3. AIR 197.Allahaba4. AIR 196.SC 107.5. AIR 196.Calcutt6. AIR 196.SC 28.7. AIR 196.SC 40.8. AIR 198.AP 21.9. 1995 LAP 48.10. AIR 195.SC 50.11. AIR 195.SC 59.12. AIR 196.SC 34.13. AIR 196.SC 113.(1) 14. 1970 (1) SCC 55.15. AIR 197.SC 86.JUDGMENT: O.S.No.29 of 1979 was laid on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur. The suit was transferred to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Penukonda and was renumbered as O.S.No.209 of 1980. In 1984, the suit was made over to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Kadiri and renumbered as O.S.No.19 of 1984. It is this O.S.No.19 of 1984, which was disposed of by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kadiri, the judgment and the decree of whi...
T. Venkat Ramdev Vs. G. Arjun Reddy and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-14-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY C.R.P.No.6281 o14. 12-2012 T. Venkat Ramdev G. Arjun Reddy and others Counsel for the petitioner: Sri A.K. Jayaprakash Rao Counsel for Respondents: None appeared : ?Cases referred:1. 2008 (1) ALD 46.ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by order dated 16-08-2012 passed in I.A.No.126 of 2012 in O.S.No.535 of 2011 on the file of the Court of III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar (I.A). The petitioner herein is the respondent in the I.A. and plaintiff in the suit whereas the respondents herein are the petitioners in the I.A. and defendants in the suit. For convenience sake, I refer the parties as arrayed in the I.A. The respondent filed the suit against the petitioners for permanent injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. The petitioners (defendants) filed the I.A. under Order XXVI Rule 9 C.P.C. for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to ...
1. Sri Ditta Seetha Ramalingeswara Sarma Vs. the State, Represented by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-14-2012
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1530 OF 2005.14-12-2012 1. Sri Ditta Seetha Ramalingeswara Sarma DSRL Sarma, Prohibition & Excise Inspector, P & E Sub-Division, Officer's Squad, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy district and another The State, Represented by its Inspector of Police,Anti-Corruption Bureau, Hyderabad Range, Hyderabad Counsel for the Appellants:Sri K. Suresh Reddy Counsel for the Respondent:Sri M.B.Thimma Reddy,Standing counsel for ACB Cases. : ?CITATIONS :1. AIR 197.SC-1408 2) 2004 CRL.LAW JOURNAL-884 JUDGMENT : Initially this appeal was filed by the first accused Sri Dita Seetha Ramalingeswara Sarma [D.S.R.L. Sarma], Prohibition and Excise Inspector, Prohibition & Excise Sub-Division, Officer's Squad, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy district, against his conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, by the judgment dated 19-09-2005 in CC.No. 12 of 1999.2. The appellant, Prohibition and...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., D.O.3, Vs. Athmakuri Rama Rao S/O Lat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-14-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR M.A.C.M.A.No.2632 o14. 12-2012 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., D.O.3, Chennai,Rep. by its Local Branch Manager, Khammam Athmakuri Rama Rao S/o Late Ramaiah, and another Counsel for the appellant: Sri A.Ramakrishna Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri Pulla Rao Yellanki Counsel for respondent No.2: --- : : Cases referred:1. 2004 ACJ 97.(Del) 2.1997 (3) CTC 34.Judgment: The insurer, who is the 2nd respondent in M.V.O.P.No.776 of 2009 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Principal District Judge, Khammam (the Tribunal, for short), preferred the present appeal assailing the award of compensation at Rs.2,75,000/- together with interest at 7.5% per annum in favour of the sole claimant.2. The deceased Athmakuri Ramaiah was statedly doing commission business and was also indulging in agricultural work. On 27-5-2006, the deceased and his friend P.W.2 were returning from Bhairavunipalli village to their village Yadavalli on a motorcyc...
Gowri Shanker Gupta and Another....Petito Vs. State of A.P. Through Pu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL PETITION NOs. 8940 of 2012, 8941 of 2012, 8942 of 2012 & 8943 o13. 12.2012 Gowri Shanker Gupta & another....Petitoners State of A.P. through Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & another....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri M.S. Srinivasa Iyengar Counsel for the Respondents: The Public Prosecutor Sri P.Sree Raghuram, Sr. counsel Sri S.Niranjan Reddy : : ?Cases referred:1. (2010) 1 SCC 67.2) 2004 (2) ALD (Crl.) 651 (SC) 3) AIR 195.AP 63.4) 2002 (1) ALT (Crl.5. (1998) 3 Supreme Court Case6. (2005) 4 Supreme Court Case7. (1998) 9 Supreme Court Case8. (2009) 2 Supreme Court Case9. (2006) 9 Supreme Court Case10. (2008) 3 Supreme Court Case11. 1993 Supp (4) SCC 12.(1977) 4 Supreme Court Case13. (2001) 2 Supreme Court Case14. (2008) 14 Supreme Court Case15. (2012) 5 SCC 69.16) (2002) 2 Supreme Court Case17. 1986 (2) ALT 56.18) (2005) 3 Supreme Court Case19. (2008) 8 Supreme Court Cases 781 COMMON ORDER: These Crim...
Smt. P.L. Lakshmi Vs. the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporat
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 17003 o13. 12.2012 Smt. P.L. Lakshmi The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation & others Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Kasa Jaganmohana Reddy Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2 : Sri C. Damodar Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Sri C. Buchi Reddy HEAD NOTE: Cases referred ORDER: This Writ Petition is preferred by a sixty-year-old woman, questioning the legality and validity of an order passed by the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation on 06.06.2012 directing the 3rd respondent owner of the building to pull down the said structure. The petitioner is eking out her livelihood by working as a domestic help. She is a tenant of the premises bearing House No. 5-9-889, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad, for more tha1. 2 decades. The 3rd respondent owner of the premises has some disputes with the tenants in the first floor of the house, against whom he filed a civil suit, O.S.No. 2537 of 2004 on the file of the III Additional Rent Contr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »