Andhra Pradesh Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. V. Rani Vs. the Collector and District Magistrate,y.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 30912 o21. 12-2012. Smt. V. Rani The Collector and District Magistrate,Y.S.R. District, Kadapa and others. For the petitioner: Smt. D. Sangeetha Reddy For the Respondents: The Advocate General : ?CITATIONS: Order:(Per Sri. N.V. Ramana, J.) The petitioner, who claims to be the wife of the detenu, namely Gone Venkatadri Naidu, who is now detained in Central Prison, Cherlapally, has filed this writ petition praying this Court to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and to set him at liberty forthwith, by declaring the order of detention dated 08.08.2012 passed by respondent, as confirmed by respondent No.2, vide orders issued in G.O. Rt. No. 4391, General Administration (Law & Order.II) Department, dated 21.09.2012, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. The Divisional Forest Officer, Kadapa, YSR District, informed resp...
Tirumala Educational Trust, Tirumala Hil Vs. Tirumala Tirupati Devasth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY C.R.P.NO.3481 o21. 12-2012 Tirumala Educational Trust, Tirumala Hills tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Counsel for the petitioner: Smt. Bobba Vijayalakshmi Counsel for Respondent: Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 198.AP 32.2. AIR 200.SC 3.3. AIR 200.SC 1330(1) 4. AIR 200.DELHI 20 5. 2010(3) ALD 12.6. AIR 200.SC 40.7. AIR 200.KARNATAKA 50 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by order dated 21-07-2012 passed in I.A.No.692 of 2012 in O.A.No.547 of 2011 on the file of A.P. Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short 'the Tribunal').2. The petitioner herein is also the petitioner in the I.A. and respondent in the O.A. whereas the respondent herein is also the respondent in the I.A. and petitioner in the O.A. For convenience sake, I refer the parties as arrayed in the O.A.3. The petitioner filed the O.A. to declare the respondent as the encroacher of the petition schedule prop...
Smt V. Madhavi Vs. Dr.K.Thirupal Reddy and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complaint is filed seeking direction to the opposite parties for payment of `14,00,000/- towards medical and other expenses along with compensation of `50 lakh and costs. 2. The averments of the complaint are that on 6.8.2008 the complainant during her period of pregnancy, approached the opposite party no.1 for regular check-up and he suggested LSCS to the complainant and advised her to be admitted in opposite party no.3 hospital. On 7.8.2008 at about 8.00 p.m. she was admitted in opposite party no.3 hospital and cesarean operation was done on the complainant on 8.8.2008. The complainant gave birth to a male child. The opposite party no.2 after conducting investigation on 9.8.2008 issued report showing no complications. On 9.8.2008 at about 4.45 p.m. the complainant was administered blood transfusion as per the instructions of the opposite party no.1. The complainant developed complications during blood transfusion and it w...
Challa Vykuntarao Vs. Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd, Rep. by Its Managing Direc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
T. Ashok Kumar , Honble Member 1. This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant as against the orders dated 21.12.2010 in CC 62/2008 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Srikakulam. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant had purchased 30 kgs of Ankur brand groundnut seeds from OP no.2 on 14.11.2006 for Rs.3,180/- vide receipt bearing No. 36 dated 14.11.2006 with guarantee that the seeds would germinate 70% and purity upto 90%. But the seeds which were sowed in his fields did not produce normal yield. Complainant obtained six bags of groundnuts as against normal yield of 20 bags and thus sustained loss of Rs.14,000/- The complainant sustained loss at Rs.24,180/- and a notice dated 02.08.2007 got issued to Ops but there was no reply and thus he filed the complaint against the Ops to pay Rs.3,180/- towards sale price of the seeds, Rs.21,000/- towards labour c...
Acalmar Oils and Fats Ltd. Vs. the Divisional Manager New India Assura ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complaint is filed seeking direction to the opposite party-insurance company for payment of `24,17,789/- and interest thereon ,compensation and costs. 2. The averments of the complaint are that the complainant-company obtained insurance policy bearing number 710100/21/09/10/70000089 from the opposite party-insurance company for the year 2009-2010 covering risk of edible oils. The complainant company entered into a memorandum of understanding for coverage of import/export of edible oils for marine insurance on 31.3.2009 and no document other than bill of lading is necessary for confirmation of quantity and quality. The consignment was sent by Acalpo WilMar PTE Limited Singapore from Belawan, Indonesia to Kakinada. The complainant received 4923.406mt as against the quantity sent which was 4999.842mt. The surveyor assessed the shortfall in the oil. The complainant company made a claim for an amount of `24,17,789/- on 6.10.2009...
M/S. Shine Shanthisoftware Technologies Vs. the District Collector, Ea ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32977 o20. 12.2012 M/s. Shine Shanthisoftware Technologies Private Limited, Musheerabad,Rep. by its Managing Director P. Raghavendra Rao. The District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada, And others. HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. Koppula Gopal Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2: AGP for Medical Health & Family Welfare Counsel for Respondent No.3: Mr. K.S. Murthy. ?CASES REFERRED:1. AIR 199.SC 95.2. (2000) 2 SCC 61.3. AIR 199.SC 5.4. (2006) 11 SCC 54.5. 2012(1) ALT 5.The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in seeking to accept the tender of respondent No.3 for the work relating to Aarogyasri documentation in pursuance of tender notification dated 10.09.2012 as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Mr. Koppula Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical & Health appearing fo...
J. Surisha Dai D/O. Nagaiah and Others Vs. Dr. Ntr University
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.23754of 2009 and Batch 20-12-2012 W. P. No.23754 OF 2009.J.Surisha Dai D/o. Nagaiah and others Dr. NTR University Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri T. Venkata Thippa Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.1:Sri D.V. Nagarjuna Babu Standing Counsel. ^Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: Standing Counsel for Central Government. : (WRIT PETITION Nos.23754, 23610, 25452, 25472 and 22840 of 2009, 7700, 7751, 24147 and 24160 of 2011 AND 25476.6743, 6746, and 25505 of 2012 COMMON ORDER: In this batch of writ petitions, the legality of the admission of the petitioners into the 1st year of Batchelor of Ayurved Medicine & Surgery (BAMS) Course into two institutions, namely, Sri Vaageswari Ayurvedic Medical College at Kurnool and Vaagdevi Ayurvedic Medical College at Warangal for the academic year 2009-10, arises for consideration.2. The respective educational Societies intended to establish the two colleges mentioned above, to impa...
Durgam Subramanyam Vs. 1. Government of A.P., Represented by It
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR W.P.No.28281 o20. 12-2012 Durgam Subramanyam 1. Government of A.P., represented by its Chief Secretary,Hyderabad and others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P.Gangaiah Naidu, Senior Counsel representing Sri N. Bharat Babu Counsel for respondents : Smt. Mohana Reddy, Counsel representing the Advocate General 1.(2008) 16 SCC 14=AIR 200.SC 62.2. (2012) 7 SCC 53.3. 1992 Supp.(1) SCC 49.4. Unreported judgment of this Court in WP No.12166/2010 dt. 18-8-2010.5. (2004) 3 SCC 28.6. 1995 Supp(4) SCC 25.7. (1988) 1 SCC 28.8. (1990) 2 SCC 1 ORDER: (Per C.Praveen Kumar,J) This writ petition under Art.226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of Mandamus to declare the proceedings dt. 25-6-2012 issued by the District Collector and Magistrate, Chittoor ordering the detention of the petitioner under section 3(1) r/w 3(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootle...
The Commissioner of Income Tax-ii, Hyder Vs. Syed Ali Adil
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA I.T.T.A.No.410 o20. 12.2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Hyderabad. Syed Ali Adil HEAD NOTE: Standing Counsel for Appellant: Sri B.Narasimha Sarma Counsel for Respondent: None appears Cases referre309. ITR 32.2 26 ITJ 49.(Bombay107. ITJ 35.(Chennai110. ITJ 44.(Delhi107. ITD 32.(Mumbai) 6 (2011) 331 ITR 21.(Karnataka) JUDGMENT (per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao): This appeal is filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') by the Revenue challenging the order dated 09-09-2011 in I.T.A.No.284/Hyd/2011 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "B", Hyderabad.2. The respondent is an individual assessee. He filed his return of income for the assessment year 2007-08 on 31-08-2007 with the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-VI (1), Hyderabad admitting therein a net income of Rs.43,97,840/-. The said return was processed under Section 143...
Akshara Public School, Rep.by Its Secret Vs. the Government of Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.28666; 31994 OF 201.19-12-2012 Akshara Public School, rep.by its Secretary and Correspondent. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education,Secretariat, Hyderabad and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Abhinand Kumar Shavili Counsel for the Respondent: Government Pleader for School Education. : ?Cases referred: Nil. WRIT PETITION Nos.28666 AND 3199.OF 201.COMMON ORDER: The Government Schools have been subjected to negligence and the decline in the admission in to those institutions is the indicator of that. The reasons are many and this is not the occasion to analyse them. Private agencies have come forward and have established schools to cater to the needs, overcoming several odds. It is a different matter that unhealthy competition among them resulted in several unwelcome developments. Interference by politicians in the administration of government schools has slowly expanded to cove...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »