Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Climate Control, Inc. Vs. Hill

Climate Control, Inc. vs Hill

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-14-1960
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99797

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
364 U.S. 409
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Climate Control, Inc.

Respondent

Hill

Excerpt

climate control, inc. v. hill - 364 u.s. 409 (1960) u.s. supreme court climate control, inc. v. hill, 364 u.s. 409 (1960) 364 u.s. 409 climate control, inc., v. hill et al. appeal from the supreme court of arizona. no. 251. decided november 14, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 86 ariz. 180, 342 p.2d 854; 87 ariz. 201, 349 p.2d 771. william r. meagher for appellant. william w. stevenson, samuel h. morris, richard m. fennemore, daniel e. cracchiolo, j. a. riggins, jr., denison kitchel, francis j. ryley, ivan robinette, edward jacobson, howard twitty, john r. franks and richard g. kleindienst for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. bobo v. mayor & councilmen of savannah beach, 364 u.s. 409 (1960) 364 u.s. 409 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court bobo v. mayor & councilmen of savannah beach, 364 u.s. 409 (1960) 364 u.s. 409 bobo v. mayor & councilmen of savannah beach, georgia. appeal from the supreme court of georgia. no. 409. decid

Full Judgment

CLIMATE CONTROL, INC. v. HILL - 364 U.S. 409 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court CLIMATE CONTROL, INC. v. HILL, 364 U.S. 409 (1960) 364 U.S. 409

CLIMATE CONTROL, INC., v. HILL ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 251.
Decided November 14, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 86 Ariz. 180, 342 P.2d 854; 87 Ariz. 201, 349 P.2d 771.

William R. Meagher for appellant.

William W. Stevenson, Samuel H. Morris, Richard M. Fennemore, Daniel E. Cracchiolo, J. A. Riggins, Jr., Denison Kitchel, Francis J. Ryley, Ivan Robinette, Edward Jacobson, Howard Twitty, John R. Franks and Richard G. Kleindienst for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOBO v. MAYOR & COUNCILMEN OF SAVANNAH BEACH, <a href="/99797"> 364 U.S. 409 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 409 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court BOBO v. MAYOR & COUNCILMEN OF SAVANNAH BEACH, 364 U.S. 409 (1960) 364 U.S. 409

BOBO v. MAYOR & COUNCILMEN OF SAVANNAH BEACH, GEORGIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.
No. 409.
Decided November 14, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 216 Ga. 12, 114 S. E. 2d 374.

Erwin A. Friedman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 409, 410



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial